Advanced practice nursing role development: factor analysis of a modified role delineation tool

被引:42
作者
Chang, Anne M. [1 ,2 ]
Gardner, Glenn E. [1 ,3 ]
Duffield, Christine [4 ]
Ramis, Mary-Anne [2 ]
机构
[1] Queensland Univ Technol, Inst Hlth & Biomed Innovat, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia
[2] Mater Hlth Serv, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Royal Brisbane & Womens Hosp, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[4] Univ Technol Sydney, Ctr Hlth Serv Management, Fac Nursing Midwifery & Hlth, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
关键词
advanced practice nursing; factor analysis; instrument development; nurse's role; nursing evaluation research; reliability and validity; EXPLORATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS; CRITICAL-CARE; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05850.x
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
chang a.m., gardner g.e., duffield c. & ramis m.a. (2012) Advanced practice nursing role development: factor analysis of a modified role delineation tool. Journal of Advanced Nursing68(6), 1369-1379. Abstract Aim. This study reports the use of exploratory factor analysis to determine construct validity of a modified advanced practice role delineation tool. Background. Little research exists on specific activities and domains of practice within advanced practice nursing roles, making it difficult to define service parameters of this level of nursing practice. A valid and reliable tool would assist those responsible for employing or deploying advanced practice nurses by identifying and defining their service profile. This is the third article from a multi-phase Australian study aimed at assigning advanced practice roles. Methods. A postal survey was conducted of a random sample of state government employed Registered Nurses and midwives, across various levels and grades of practice in the state of Queensland, Australia, using the modified Advanced Practice Role Delineation tool. Exploratory factor analysis, using principal axis factoring was undertaken to examine factors in the modified tool. Cronbachs alpha coefficient determined reliability of the overall scale and identified factors. Results. There were 658 responses (42% response rate). The five factors found with loadings of =400 for 40 of the 41 APN activities were similar to the five domains in the Strong model. Cronbachs alpha coefficient was 0.94 overall and for the factors ranged from 0.83 to 0.95. Conclusion. Exploratory factor analysis of the modified tool supports validity of the five domains of the original tool. Further investigation will identify use of the tool in a broader healthcare environment.
引用
收藏
页码:1369 / 1379
页数:11
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Ackerman M H, 1996, Am J Crit Care, V5, P68
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, SPSS SURVIVAL MANUAL
[3]  
[Anonymous], J ADV NURS
[4]  
BARTLETT MS, 1954, J ROY STAT SOC B, V16, P296
[5]   Advanced practice nursing roles: development, implementation and evaluation [J].
Bryant-Lukosius, D ;
DiCenso, A ;
Browne, G ;
Pinelli, J .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2004, 48 (05) :519-529
[6]   A framework for the introduction and evaluation of advanced practice nursing roles [J].
Bryant-Lukosius, D ;
DiCenso, A .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2004, 48 (05) :530-540
[7]  
Buchan J, 2000, Int Nurs Rev, V47, P199
[8]   A Delphi study to validate an Advanced Practice Nursing tool [J].
Chang, Anne M. ;
Gardner, Glenn E. ;
Duffield, Christine ;
Ramis, Mary-Anne .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2010, 66 (10) :2320-2330
[9]   Advanced nursing roles in critical care - A natural or forced evolution? [J].
Coombs, Maureen ;
Chaboyer, Wendy ;
Sole, Mary Lou .
JOURNAL OF PROFESSIONAL NURSING, 2007, 23 (02) :83-90
[10]  
Costello A. B., 2005, RES EVALUATION, V10