1RM prediction: a novel methodology based on the force-velocity and load-velocity relationships

被引:57
作者
Picerno, Pietro [1 ]
Iannetta, Danilo [2 ]
Comotto, Stefania [2 ]
Donati, Marco
Pecoraro, Fabrizio [3 ]
Zok, Mounir [4 ]
Tollis, Giorgio [1 ]
Figura, Marco
Varalda, Carlo [5 ]
Di Muzio, Davide [2 ]
Patrizio, Federica [2 ]
Piacentini, Maria Francesca [2 ]
机构
[1] ECampus Univ, Sch Sport & Exercise Sci, Fac Psychol, Via Isimbardi 10, I-22060 Novedrate, CO, Italy
[2] Univ Rome Foro Italico, Dept Movement Human & Hlth Sci, Rome, Italy
[3] CNR, Inst Res Populat & Social Policies, Rome, Italy
[4] US Olymp Comm, Colorado Springs, CO USA
[5] Italian Weightlifting Federat, Rome, Italy
关键词
One-repetition maximum; Muscle strength assessment; Force-velocity relationship; Resistance training; MUSCULAR ENDURANCE REPETITIONS; MAXIMUM BENCH PRESS; STRENGTH; SQUAT; POWER; PERFORMANCE; EQUATIONS; ACCURACY; ENCODER;
D O I
10.1007/s00421-016-3457-0
中图分类号
Q4 [生理学];
学科分类号
071003 ;
摘要
This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of a novel approach for predicting the one-repetition maximum (1RM). The prediction is based on the force-velocity and load-velocity relationships determined from measured force and velocity data collected during resistance-training exercises with incremental submaximal loads. 1RM was determined as the load corresponding to the intersection of these two curves, where the gravitational force exceeds the force that the subject can exert. The proposed force-velocity-based method (FVM) was tested on 37 participants (23.9 +/- 3.1 year; BMI 23.44 +/- 2.45) with no specific resistance-training experience, and the predicted 1RM was compared to that achieved using a direct method (DM) in chest-press (CP) and leg-press (LP) exercises. The mean 1RM in CP was 99.5 kg (+/- 27.0) for DM and 100.8 kg (+/- 27.2) for FVM (SEE = 1.2 kg), whereas the mean 1RM in LP was 249.3 kg (+/- 60.2) for DM and 251.1 kg (+/- 60.3) for FVM (SEE = 2.1 kg). A high correlation was found between the two methods for both CP and LP exercises (0.999, p < 0.001). Good agreement between the two methods emerged from the Bland and Altman plot analysis. These findings suggest the use of the proposed methodology as a valid alternative to other indirect approaches for 1RM prediction. The mathematical construct is simply based on the definition of the 1RM, and it is fed with subject's muscle strength capacities measured during a specific exercise. Its reliability is, thus, expected to be not affected by those factors that typically jeopardize regression-based approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:2035 / 2043
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   A DYNAMOMETER FOR EVALUATION OF DYNAMIC MUSCLE WORK [J].
BOSCO, C ;
BELLI, A ;
ASTRUA, M ;
TIHANYI, J ;
POZZO, R ;
KELLIS, S ;
TSARPELA, O ;
FOTI, C ;
MANNO, R ;
TRANQUILLI, C .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY AND OCCUPATIONAL PHYSIOLOGY, 1995, 70 (05) :379-386
[2]  
Bosquet L, 2010, J SPORT SCI MED, V9, P459
[3]  
Brown L.E., 2001, PROFESSIONALIZATION, V4, DOI DOI 10.4236/JEP.2013.46A001
[4]  
Dohoney P., 2002, J EXERCISE PHYSL, V5, P54
[5]  
Fleck S., 2004, Designing Resistance Training Programs, V4th ed
[6]   Effect of Different Interrepetition Rest Periods on Barbell Velocity Loss During the Ballistic Bench Press Exercise [J].
Garcia-Ramos, Amador ;
Padial, Paulino ;
Haff, G. Gregory ;
Argueelles-Cienfuegos, Javier ;
Garcia-Ramos, Miguel ;
Conde-Pipo, Javier ;
Feriche, Belen .
JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2015, 29 (09) :2388-2396
[7]  
Gonzalez-Badillo JJ, 2001, J HUM KINET, V29, P15
[8]   Effect of loading on unintentional lifting velocity declines during single sets of repetitions to failure during upper and lower extremity muscle actions [J].
Izquierdo, M. ;
Gonzalez-Badillo, J. J. ;
Hakkinen, K. ;
Ibanez, J. ;
Kraemer, W. J. ;
Altadill, A. ;
Eslava, J. ;
Gorostiaga, E. M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2006, 27 (09) :718-724
[9]  
Jane GK, 1995, P 13 INT S BIOM SPOR, P330
[10]  
Jidovtseff B, 2008, J SPORT MED PHYS FIT, V48, P55