Morbidity Of Prostate Biopsy After Simplified Versus Complex Preparation Protocols: Assessment of Risk Factors

被引:75
作者
Zaytoun, Osama M. [1 ]
Anil, Thomas [1 ]
Moussa, Ayman S. [1 ]
Jianbo, Li [1 ]
Fareed, Khaled [1 ]
Jones, J. Stephen [1 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin, Dept Reg Urol, Glickman Urol & Kidney Inst, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
关键词
ULTRASOUND-GUIDED BIOPSY; ANTIBIOTIC-PROPHYLAXIS; PATIENT PREPARATION; CANCER DETECTION; FLUOROQUINOLONE; COMPLICATIONS; EFFICACY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; PREVENTION; INFECTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2010.12.033
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE To determine whether prostate biopsy complications were affected by 2 varying prebiospy protocols implemented at our institution. Although transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided prostate biopsy is considered generally safe, it is associated with significant complications. METHODS We retrospectively evaluated a total of 1438 TRUS-guided prostate biopsies between January 2001 and June 2008. In group A, 931 men had only one dose of a quinolone antibiotic immediately before the procedure, and no enema was performed. In group B, 507 men who underwent a prebiopsy enema and were given oral antibiotics starting the day before the procedure for 3 days. We analyzed demographics and biopsy complications between the 2 groups. RESULTS The overall complication rates were categorized as infection (2.2%), urine retention (0.8%), hematuria (4.4%), rectal bleeding (1.5%), sepsis (0.2%). There was no significant statistical difference in the incidence of infection or sepsis between the 2 groups (2.7% vs 1.4%, P = .157 and 0.1% vs 0.4%, P = .285 respectively, for group A vs B). Both hematuria and hematospermia were more common in group B (2.5% vs 7.9%, P < .001 and 0.2% vs 2%, P < .001 respectively, for group A vs B). Prostate size was a significant risk for both hematuria (odds ratio = 1.7, 95% confidence interval = 1.2-2.44, P = .003) and acute urinary retention (odds ratio = 4.45, 95% confidence interval = 2.01-9.84, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates that a single antibiotic dose before prostate biopsy may be sufficient. In addition, use of prebiopsy enemas is unnecessary to decrease overall complication rates. UROLOGY 77: 910-914, 2011. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:910 / 914
页数:5
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Antibiotic prophylaxis for transrectal needle biopsy of the prostate: a randomized controlled study [J].
Aron, M ;
Rajeev, TP ;
Gupta, NP .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2000, 85 (06) :682-685
[2]   Infection after transrectal core biopsies of the prostate - Risk factors and antibiotic prophylaxis [J].
Aus, G ;
Ahlgren, G ;
Bergdahl, S ;
Hugosson, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1996, 77 (06) :851-855
[3]   EAU guidelines on prostate cancer [J].
Aus, G ;
Abbou, CC ;
Bolla, M ;
Heidenreich, A ;
Schmid, HP ;
van Poppel, H ;
Wolff, J ;
Zattoni, F .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2005, 48 (04) :546-551
[4]  
BENTLEY FD, 2003, INFECT UROL, V16, P3
[5]   Complication rate of transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: A comparison among 3 protocols with 6, 10 and 15 cores [J].
Berger, AP ;
Gozzi, C ;
Steiner, H ;
Frauscher, F ;
Varkarakis, J ;
Rogatsch, H ;
Bartsch, G ;
Horninger, W .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (04) :1478-1480
[6]   Prospective assessment of the efficacy of single dose versus traditional 3-day antimicrobial prophylaxis in 12-core transrectal prostate biopsy [J].
Cam, Kamil ;
Kayikci, Ali ;
Akman, Yavuz ;
Erol, Ali .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 15 (11) :997-1001
[7]   Transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of the prostate. Do enemas decrease clinically significant complications? [J].
Carey, JM ;
Korman, HJ .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (01) :82-85
[8]   Major complications and associated risk factors of transrectal ultrasound guided prostate needle biopsy: A retrospective study of 1875 cases in Taiwan [J].
Chiang, I-Ni ;
Chang, Shang-Jen ;
Pu, Yeong-Shiau ;
Huang, Kuo-How ;
Yu, Hong-Jen ;
Huang, Chao-Yuan .
JOURNAL OF THE FORMOSAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2007, 106 (11) :929-934
[9]   PROSTATE-CANCER DETECTION IN A CLINICAL UROLOGICAL PRACTICE BY ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION AND PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN [J].
COONER, WH ;
MOSLEY, BR ;
RUTHERFORD, CL ;
BEARD, JH ;
POND, HS ;
TERRY, WJ ;
IGEL, TC ;
KIDD, DD .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1990, 143 (06) :1146-1154
[10]   PREVENTION OF URINARY-TRACT INFECTION AND SEPSIS FOLLOWING TRANS-RECTAL PROSTATIC BIOPSY [J].
CRAWFORD, ED ;
HAYNES, AL ;
STORY, MW ;
BORDEN, TA .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1982, 127 (03) :449-451