How does magnification affect image quality and patient dose in digital subtraction angiography?

被引:1
作者
Gkanatsios, NA [1 ]
Huda, W [1 ]
Peters, KR [1 ]
机构
[1] Baylor Univ, Med Ctr, Dallas, TX 75246 USA
来源
MEDICAL IMAGING 2001: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING | 2001年 / 4320卷
关键词
magnification; dosimetry; image quality; neuroradiology; digital subtraction angiography;
D O I
10.1117/12.430927
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) images were obtained of a phantom containing I mm diameter vessels. The iodine concentrations ranged from 5 to 50 mg/cc, which permitted the detection threshold iodine concentration to be determined. The source to image receptor distance was 105 cm, and image magnification was varied between 1.15 and 2.0. One experiment was performed at an input exposure of 1 mu Gy per frame, and a second experiment was performed at 4 mu Gy per frame. Surface (skin) doses were measured using an ionization chamber, and the corresponding values of energy imparted were determined from the exposure area product. Increasing the radiation exposure by a factor of four reduced the threshold iodine concentration by similar to 30%. The average detection threshold iodine concentration for a magnification of 1.15 was 13.6 mg/cc. Detection performance improved linearly with magnification, with an average value of 7.4 mg/cc at a magnification of 2.0. Values of energy imparted were independent of image magnification, whereas surface doses increased by a factor of four when image magnification was increased from 1.15 to 2.0. Magnification offers improved imaging performance at no additional patient risk provided that surface doses do not exceed the dose threshold for deterministic effects such as skin bums and epilation.
引用
收藏
页码:326 / 330
页数:5
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1991, ANN ICRP, V60
[2]  
DOI K, 1974, Medical Physics (Woodbury), V1, P257, DOI 10.1118/1.1637304
[3]  
DOI K, 1977, RADIOLOGY, V122, P479, DOI 10.1148/122.2.479
[4]   Evaluation of an on-line patient exposure meter in neuroradiology [J].
Gkanatsios, NA ;
Huda, W ;
Peters, KR ;
Freeman, JA .
RADIOLOGY, 1997, 203 (03) :837-842
[5]   Computation of energy imparted in diagnostic radiology [J].
Gkanatsios, NA ;
Huda, W .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1997, 24 (04) :571-579
[6]  
GKANATSIOS NA, 1998, THESIS U FLORIDA GAI
[7]   RADIATION-INDUCED TEMPORARY EPILATION AFTER A NEURORADIOLOGICALLY GUIDED EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE [J].
HUDA, W ;
PETERS, KR .
RADIOLOGY, 1994, 193 (03) :642-644
[8]  
Osborn A.G., 1999, Diagnostic Cerebral Angiography, V2nd ed.
[9]   EFFECT OF RADIOGRAPHIC MAGNIFICATION ON IMAGE-CONTRAST OF BLOOD-VESSELS [J].
SANDOR, T ;
NOTT, P .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1980, 134 (01) :159-162
[10]   ABSOLUTE MEASURES OF PHYSICAL IMAGE QUALITY - MEASUREMENT AND APPLICATION TO RADIOGRAPHIC MAGNIFICATION [J].
SANDRIK, JM ;
WAGNER, RF .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1982, 9 (04) :540-549