Thermodynamic evaluation of integrated gasification combined cycle: Comparison between high-ash and low-ash coals

被引:14
作者
Arabkhalaj, Arash [1 ]
Ghassemi, Hojat [1 ]
Markadeh, Rasoul Shahsavan [1 ]
机构
[1] Iran Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Mech Engn, POB 16765-163, Tehran, Iran
关键词
high-ash coal; integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC); ASPEN PLUS (R); energy analysis; exergy analysis; emissions; IGCC POWER-PLANTS; CO2; CAPTURE; PROCESS SIMULATION; PERFORMANCE; OPTIMIZATION; GENERATION; EFFICIENCY; CARBON; GASIFIER; RECOVERY;
D O I
10.1002/er.3541
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
In the present study, a coal-integrated gasification combined cycle power plant is simulated. A high-ash coal and low-ash coal are considered to compare the performance of the plant. The combined cycle is in typical commercial size with 450MW capacity. The feeds are Tabas and Illinois #6 coals which approximately contain more than 30% and 10% ash and have higher heating values of 22.7 MJ/kg and 26.8 MJ/kg, respectively. Energy and exergy analyses are done by ASPEN PLUS (R) and EES, respectively. Energy analysis shows that the overall efficiencies of power plants using high-ash and low-ash coals are 33% and 28%, respectively. The result shows that in high-ash case, 52 kg/s coal, 10 kg/s water, and 1050 kg/s air and in low-ash case, 48 kg/s coal and 820 kg/s air are required for providing mentioned power, approximately. Exergy analysis shows that maximum exergy destruction is in heat recovery steam generator unit. Investigating the emissions shows that high percent of ash in the coal composition has slight effects on the IGCC pollution. Finally, from thermodynamic viewpoint, it is concluded that the high-ash coal, like the conventional one, can be used as thermally efficient and environmentally compatible feed of IGCCs. Copyright (C) 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1638 / 1651
页数:14
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Amano RS, 2008, INT SER DEV HEAT TRA, P1
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, TEC IGCC FEAS AN
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, KEY WORLD EN STAT
[4]  
Bejan A, 1996, Thermal Design and Optimization
[5]  
Black J. B., 2011, DOENETL20101399
[6]   Comparative performance assessment of USC and IGCC power plants integrated with CO2 capture systems [J].
Cau, Giorgio ;
Tola, Vittorio ;
Deiana, Paolo .
FUEL, 2014, 116 :820-833
[7]   A unified correlation for estimating HHV of solid, liquid and gaseous fuels [J].
Channiwala, SA ;
Parikh, PP .
FUEL, 2002, 81 (08) :1051-1063
[8]   Investigation of the Gasification Performance of Lignite Feedstock and the Injection Design of a Cross-Type Two-Stage Gasifier [J].
Chyou, Yau-Pin ;
Chen, Ming-Hong ;
Luan, Yan-Tsan ;
Wang, Ting .
ENERGY & FUELS, 2013, 27 (06) :3110-3121
[9]   Introductory study on Fuel-Slurry Integrated Gasifier/Gas Turbine (FSIG/GT) alternative for power generation applied to high-ash or low-grade coal [J].
de Souza-Santos, Marcio L. ;
de Lima, Eduardo H. S. .
FUEL, 2015, 143 :275-284
[10]   Efficiency of an Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) power plant including CO2 removal [J].
Descamps, C. ;
Bouallou, C. ;
Kanniche, M. .
ENERGY, 2008, 33 (06) :874-881