Impact of secondary care financial incentives on the quality of physical healthcare for people with psychosis: a longitudinal controlled study

被引:1
|
作者
Crawford, Mike J. [1 ,2 ]
Huddart, Daniel [3 ]
Craig, Eleanor [2 ]
Zalewska, Krysia [2 ]
Quirk, Alan [2 ]
Shiers, David [2 ]
Strathdee, Geraldine [4 ]
Cooper, Stephen J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, Ctr Psychiat, Mental Hlth Res, London, England
[2] Royal Coll Psychiatrists, Coll Ctr Qual Improvement, London, England
[3] Imperial Coll London, Ctr Psychiat, Hammersmith Campus, London W12 0NN, England
[4] South London & Maudsley NHS Fdn, Beckenham, Kent, England
关键词
Financial incentives; psychosis; screening; prevention; SCHIZOPHRENIA; PERFORMANCE; PAY;
D O I
10.1192/bjp.2019.162
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background Concerns have repeatedly been expressed about the quality of physical healthcare that people with psychosis receive. Aims To examine whether the introduction of a financial incentive for secondary care services led to improvements in the quality of physical healthcare for people with psychosis. Method Longitudinal data were collected over an 8-year period on the quality of physical healthcare that people with psychosis received from 56 trusts in England before and after the introduction of the financial incentive. Control data were also collected from six health boards in Wales where a financial incentive was not introduced. We calculated the proportion of patients whose clinical records indicated that they had been screened for seven key aspects of physical health and whether they were offered interventions for problems identified during screening. Results Data from 17 947 people collected prior to (2011 and 2013) and following (2017) the introduction of the financial incentive in 2014 showed that the proportion of patients who received high-quality physical healthcare in England rose from 12.85% to 31.65% (difference 18.80, 95% CI 17.37-20.21). The proportion of patients who received high-quality physical healthcare in Wales during this period rose from 8.40% to 13.96% (difference 5.56, 95% CI 1.33-10.10). Conclusions The results of this study suggest that financial incentives for secondary care mental health services are associated with marked improvements in the quality of care that patients receive. Further research is needed to examine their impact on aspects of care that are not incentivised.
引用
收藏
页码:720 / 725
页数:6
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Impact of financial incentives on alcohol intervention delivery in primary care: a mixed-methods study
    O'Donnell, Amy
    Haighton, Catherine
    Chappel, David
    Shevills, Colin
    Kaner, Eileen
    BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2016, 17 : 1 - 10
  • [2] Estimated impact from the withdrawal of primary care financial incentives on selected indicators of quality of care in Scotland: controlled interrupted time series analysis
    Morales, Daniel R.
    Minchin, Mark
    Kontopantelis, Evangelos
    Roland, Martin
    Sutton, Matt
    Guthrie, Bruce
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 380
  • [3] Influence of financial and reputational incentives on primary care performance: a longitudinal study
    Allen, Thomas
    Whittaker, William
    Kontopantelis, Evangelos
    Sutton, Matt
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2018, 68 (677) : E811 - E818
  • [4] The impact of removing financial incentives from clinical quality indicators: longitudinal analysis of four Kaiser Permanente indicators
    Lester, Helen
    Schmittdiel, Julie
    Selby, Joe
    Fireman, Bruce
    Campbell, Stephen
    Lee, Janelle
    Whippy, Alan
    Madvig, Philip
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 340 : 1072
  • [5] Effect of financial incentives on delivery of alcohol screening and brief intervention (ASBI) in primary care: longitudinal study
    Hamilton, F. L.
    Laverty, A. A.
    Gluvajic, D.
    Huckvale, K.
    Car, J.
    Majeed, A.
    Millett, C.
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2014, 36 (03) : 450 - 459
  • [6] Improving the Recording of Diagnoses in Primary Care with Team Incentives: A Controlled Longitudinal Follow-Up Study
    Lehtovuori, Tuomo
    Kauppila, Timo
    Kallio, Jouko
    Heikkinen, Anna M.
    Raina, Marko
    Suominen, Lasse
    Sund, Reijo
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 2018
  • [7] Do care plans and annual reviews of physical health influence unplanned hospital utilisation for people with serious mental illness? Analysis of linked longitudinal primary and secondary healthcare records in England
    Ride, Jemimah
    Kasteridis, Panagiotis
    Gutacker, Nils
    Kronenberg, Christoph
    Doran, Tim
    Mason, Anne
    Rice, Nigel
    Gravelle, Hugh
    Goddard, Maria
    Kendrick, Tony
    Siddiqi, Najma
    Gilbody, Simon
    Dare, Ceri R. J.
    Aylott, Lauren
    Williams, Rachael
    Jacobs, Rowena
    BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (11):
  • [8] Impact of financial incentives on alcohol intervention delivery in primary care: a mixed-methods study
    Amy O’Donnell
    Catherine Haighton
    David Chappel
    Colin Shevills
    Eileen Kaner
    BMC Family Practice, 17
  • [9] Financial incentives for integrated care for people with chronic conditions in Belgium: a qualitative study within the CORTEXS research project
    Verhaeghe, Nick
    Van den Oord, Steven
    Vandael, Mark
    Dhondt, Steven
    Schoone-Harmsen, Marian
    Molema, Hanneke
    Dessers, Ezra
    Annemans, Lieven
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED CARE, 2017, 17
  • [10] The identification and management of people with an at-risk mental state (ARMS) for psychosis in primary and secondary care services: A qualitative interview study
    Strelchuk, Daniela
    Wiles, Nicola
    Derrick, Catherine
    Zammit, Stan
    Turner, Katrina
    EARLY INTERVENTION IN PSYCHIATRY, 2023, 17 (11) : 1116 - 1124