Psychometric properties of the neck disability index

被引:0
作者
Hains, F
Waalen, J
Mior, S
机构
[1] Canadian Mem Chiropract Coll, Div Grad Studies & Res, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Ryerson Polytech Univ, Dept Psychol, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
neck pain; psychometric properties; neck disability index;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: To determine if a response set bias existed, to assess the factor structure and internal consistency, and to compare Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores with visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for pain intensity. Summary of Background Data: Although neck pain is a common problem, few instruments exist to assess the disability that accompanies it. The NDI is a 10 item paper-and-pencil measure of disability resulting from neck pain. Study Design: A cross sectional study evaluating the psychometric properties of the NDI. Methods: Seven modified versions of the original NDI were developed to assess the presence or absence of response set bias using a one-way analysis of variance. Internal consistency was measured by a Cronbach alpha, two factor analyses (exploratory and confirmatory) were conducted to examine the structure of the NDI and stepwise regression analysis was used to examine the variables most predictive of VAS scores. Results: Results from 237 neck pain patients show that the responses given on the eight versions of the NDI are a function of the content and not of the format in which the items are presented. The NDI has stable psychometric characteristics, evidenced by high internal consistency (alpha =.92). In both factor analyses, one factor was extracted. Conclusions: The NDI possesses stable psychometric properties and provides an objective means of assessing the disability of patients suffering from neck pain.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 80
页数:6
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
CRONBACH LJ, 1960, ESSENTIALS PSYCHOL T, P451
[3]  
FRYMOYER JW, 1987, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P89
[4]   PAIN DISABILITY INDEX - CONSTRUCT AND DISCRIMINANT VALIDITY [J].
JEROME, A ;
GROSS, RT .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1991, 72 (11) :920-922
[5]  
LEAK AM, 1994, BRIT J RHEUMATOL, V33, P469
[6]  
McDowell I., 1987, MEASURING HLTH GUIDE, P12
[7]  
NELSON EC, 1990, FRONT PR CA, P97
[8]   A STUDY OF THE NATURAL-HISTORY OF BACK PAIN .1. DEVELOPMENT OF A RELIABLE AND SENSITIVE MEASURE OF DISABILITY IN LOW-BACK-PAIN [J].
ROLAND, M ;
MORRIS, R .
SPINE, 1983, 8 (02) :141-144
[9]  
SILVERSTEIN B, 1991, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V72, P631
[10]  
SPITZER WO, 1987, SPINE S, V7, pS17