Is innovation performance of private schools better than public schools'?

被引:0
作者
Chen, Su-Chang
Hsiao, Hsi-Chi
Chang, Jen-Chia [1 ]
Chou, Chun-Mei [2 ]
Shen, Chien-Hua
机构
[1] Natl Taipei Univ Technol, Inst Technol & Vocat Educ, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Natl Yunlin Univ Sci & Technol, Grad Sch Vocat & Technol Educ, Yunlin, Taiwan
来源
AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT | 2011年 / 5卷 / 14期
关键词
Organizational innovation; creative organization culture; organizational learning; bureaucratic organizations; technical institute; university; BUREAUCRACY; LEADERSHIP;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Public schools in Taiwan are bureaucratic organizations. Funds, personnel matters or regulations in private schools are more flexible. Some literatures indicate that bureaucratic organization would not lead to organizational innovation. This article selects 375 teachers in 25 public and private technical institutes and universities in Taiwan as the targets and conducts questionnaire survey. There are 335 valid questionnaires returned and valid return rate is 89.3%. The result shows that public and private schools are not the influenced factors on organizational innovation performance of the schools. Through simple regression analysis, support leadership, creative organization culture and organizational learning would positively influence organizational innovation performance of the schools. However, the result of hierarchical regression analysis demonstrates the influence of support leadership on organizational innovation performance of the schools. Creative organization culture reveals partially mediating effect. The influence of support leadership on organizational innovation performance of the schools is based on two mediating variables (organizational learning and creative organization culture). Thus, organizational innovation performance of the schools is unrelated to school attributes; instead, it is associated with creative organization culture and organizational learning.
引用
收藏
页码:5807 / 5814
页数:8
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive [J].
Adler, PS ;
Borys, B .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1996, 41 (01) :61-89
[2]   Assessing the work environment for creativity [J].
Amabile, TM ;
Conti, R ;
Coon, H ;
Lazenby, J ;
Herron, M .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1996, 39 (05) :1154-1184
[3]   Leadership and organizational learning's role on innovation and performance:: Lessons from Spain [J].
Aragon-Correa, J. Alberto ;
Garcia-Morales, Victor J. ;
Cordon-Pozo, Eulogio .
INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2007, 36 (03) :349-359
[4]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[5]   Learning to manage innovation [J].
Bessant, J ;
Caffyn, S ;
Gilbert, J .
TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 1996, 8 (01) :59-70
[7]  
Cameron KS, 1985, CULTURE CONGRUENCE S
[8]  
Chuang LM, 2005, COM MANAGE Q, V6, P69
[9]  
Daft R.L., 2005, Fundamentals of organization theory and design
[10]  
Daft R.L., 1978, INNOVATIVE ORG