Energy demand and its temporal flexibility: Approaches, criticalities and ways forward

被引:34
作者
Lo Piano, S. [1 ]
Smith, S. T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Reading, Sch Built Environm, Reading, England
基金
英国科研创新办公室; 英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Flexibility; Energy demand; Social practice theory; Demand response; Demand management; Temporality; SOCIAL PRACTICE THEORY; SIDE MANAGEMENT; CO2; MITIGATION; SUPPLY-SIDE; TIME; CONSUMPTION; IMPACT; STORAGE; TECHNOLOGIES; BUILDINGS;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2022.112249
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
ABSTR A C T This contribution reviews the options proposed to reduce and/or act on the temporal profile of energy demand (flexibility), mainly at the residential level. Automated technology-driven options and/or monetary incentives towards behaviour shifting from end users are firstly examined. A relevant finding is the existing potential points of frictions between options aimed to reduce energy demand and those acting on its temporality.The identified socio-economic drivers of residential energy demand patterns and temporality are discussed through the application of analytical frameworks for the coupling of energy and social systems, with the overall aim to gather a thorough understanding of energy demand and its temporality for more aware options for the control of energy demand and its temporal flexibility. A particular focus is dedicated to the perspective of social-practice theory for its capability of capturing relations between users and material artefacts, with a discussion of its theoretical principles and of its application in practical examples. Through examination of the dialogue between technological and social dimensions of energy demand and its temporality in the literature, assumption and epistemic uncertainty exploration lead to more aware energy demand options. Despite its significance, this research avenue remains largely unexplored. We suggest critical areas for development of this dialogue are: (i) the translation of meaning of demand in relation to concepts of non-negotiable energy end use effects associated with technology efficacy/efficiency, (ii) issues of new fixities resulting from intended technological demand flexibility, (iii) addressing issues of determinism in accounts of new technology impacts, (iv) implementation of demand side management and response technology with respect to social accounts of demand temporality.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 169 条
[1]  
Abhijith V, 2017, 2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NETWORKS & ADVANCES IN COMPUTATIONAL TECHNOLOGIES (NETACT), P426, DOI 10.1109/NETACT.2017.8076809
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2018, DEMANDING ENERGY SPA
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, DEMANDING ENERGY SPA
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1981, HIDDEN RHYTHMS SCHED
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2011, 2011 IEEE TRONDHEIM
[6]   The role of the occupant behavior in affecting the feasibility of energy refurbishment of residential buildings: Typical effective retrofits compromised by typical wrong habits [J].
Ascione, Fabrizio ;
Bianco, Nicola ;
De Masi, Rosa Francesca ;
Mastellone, Margherita ;
Mauro, Gerardo Maria ;
Vanoli, Giuseppe Peter .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2020, 223
[7]  
Ayan O, 2017, PROCEEDINGS OF 2017 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE SUSTAINABLE AND RENEWABLE ENERGY ENGINEERING (ICSREE 2017), P116, DOI 10.1109/ICSREE.2017.7951523
[8]   When I was your age: Generational effects on long-run residential energy consumption in Italy [J].
Bardazzi, Rossella ;
Pazienza, Maria Grazia .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2020, 70
[9]   Switch off the light, please! Energy use, aging population and consumption habits [J].
Bardazzi, Rossella ;
Pazienza, Maria Grazia .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2017, 65 :161-171
[10]   A review of demand side management business models in the electricity market [J].
Behrangrad, Mahdi .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 47 :270-283