Loop electrosurgical excision procedure with or without intraoperative colposcopy: a randomized trial

被引:8
作者
Hilal, Ziad [1 ]
Rezniczek, Guenther A. [1 ]
Alici, Ferizan [1 ]
Kumpernatz, Anne [1 ]
Dogan, Askin [1 ]
Alieva, Lale [1 ]
Tempfer, Clemens B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Bochum, Germany
关键词
cervical dysplasia; colposcopy; conization; controlled trial; direct colposcopic vision; loop excision; randomized; LLETZ PROCEDURE; VISION; CIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2018.07.023
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Loop electrosurgical excision procedure is the standard surgical treatment for cervical dysplasia. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure is advised to be performed under colposcopic guidance to minimize adverse pregnancy outcomes. To date, there is no evidence from randomized trials for this recommendation. OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess the benefits of performing loop electrosurgical excision procedure under colposcopic guidance in women with cervical dysplasia. STUDY DESIGN: In a prospective, randomized trial, we compared loop electrosurgical excision procedure with loop electrosurgical excision procedure performed under direct colposcopic vision in a 1: 1 ratio. The primary endpoint was resected cone mass; the secondary endpoints were margin status, fragmentation of the surgical specimen, procedure time, time to complete hemostasis, blood loss, and intraoperative and postoperative complications. A sample size of 87 per group (n = 174) was planned (with an assumed type I error of 0.05 and drop-out rate of 5%) to achieve 90% power to detect a 25% reduction in cone mass (with an assumed cone mass of 2.5 +/- 1.6 g in the control group) using a nonparametric test (Mann-Whitney U). RESULTS: From October 2016 through December 2017, we randomized 182 women: 93 in the loop electrosurgical excision procedure group and 89 in the loop electrosurgical excision procedureedirect colposcopic vision group. Women undergoing loop electrosurgical excision procedure-direct colposcopic vision had significantly smaller cone specimens than those undergoing loop electrosurgical excision procedure (weight: median 1.86 [interquartile range 1.20-2.72] vs median 2.37 [interquartile range 1.63-3.31] g, respectively, P =.006). Secondary outcome measures did not differ significantly between groups: resection margin status involved vs free margin: 12 (13%) vs 75 (82%) and 11 (12.4%) vs 75 (84.3%); fragmentation no vs yes: 85 (92.4%) vs 7 (7.6%) and 84 (94.4%) vs 5 (5.6%); procedure time: 190 (interquartile range 138-294) and 171 (interquartile range 133-290) seconds; time to complete hemostasis: 61 (interquartile range 31-108) and 51 (interquartile range 30-81) seconds; intraoperative blood loss (Dhemoglobin): 0.4 (interquartile range 0.2-1.0) and 0.5 (interquartile range 0.1-0.9); complication rate: 6 (6.5%) and 2 (2.2%). In a multivariate analysis, study group allocation (P =.021) and parity (P =.028), but not age, body mass index, type of transformation zone, and dysplasia degree independently influenced the amount of resected cone mass. CONCLUSION: Loop electrosurgical excision procedure with intraoperative colposcopy leads to significantly smaller cone specimens without compromising margin status.
引用
收藏
页码:377.e1 / 377.e7
页数:7
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] Perinatal mortality and other severe adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: meta-analysis
    Arbyn, M.
    Kyrgiou, M.
    Simoens, C.
    Raifu, A. O.
    Koliopoulos, G.
    Martin-Hirsch, P.
    Prendiville, W.
    Paraskevaidis, E.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 337 (7673): : 798 - 803
  • [2] Direct colposcopic vision used with the LLETZ procedure for optimal treatment of CIN: results of joint cohort studies
    Carcopino, Xavier
    Mancini, Julien
    Charpin, Colette
    Grisot, Celine
    Maycock, Joan Annette
    Houvenaeghel, Gilles
    Agostini, Aubert
    Boubli, Leon
    Prendiville, Walter
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2013, 288 (05) : 1087 - 1094
  • [3] How to optimize excisional procedures for the treatment of CIN? The role of colposcopy
    Grisot, Celine
    Mancini, Julien
    Giusiano, Sophie
    Houvenaeghel, Gilles
    Agostini, Aubert
    d'Ercole, Claude
    Boubli, Leon
    Prendiville, Walter
    Carcopino, Xavier
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2012, 285 (05) : 1383 - 1390
  • [4] Treatment failure following excision therapy of CIN: the impact of direct colposcopic vision during procedure
    Heineman, Mellie
    Mancini, Julien
    Villeret, Julia
    Agostini, Aubert
    Houvenaeghel, Gilles
    Boubli, Leon
    Carcopino, Xavier
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2016, 293 (04) : 825 - 831
  • [5] Large Loop Excision of the Transformation Zone Versus True Cone Biopsy Electrode Excision: A Randomized Trial
    Hilal, Ziad
    Rezniczek, Guenther A.
    El-Fizazi, Nariman
    Tempfer, Clemens B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LOWER GENITAL TRACT DISEASE, 2017, 21 (04) : 272 - 278
  • [6] Meta-analysis of cold-knife conization versus loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
    Jiang, Yan-Ming
    Chen, Chang-Xian
    Li, Li
    [J]. ONCOTARGETS AND THERAPY, 2016, 9 : 3907 - 3915
  • [7] The thickness and volume of LLETZ specimens can predict the relative risk of pregnancy-related morbidity
    Khalid, S.
    Dimitriou, E.
    Conroy, R.
    Paraskevaidis, E.
    Kyrgiou, M.
    Harrity, C.
    Arbyn, M.
    Prendiville, W.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2012, 119 (06) : 685 - 691
  • [8] Adverse obstetric outcomes after local treatment for cervical preinvasive and early invasive disease according to cone depth: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kyrgiou, Maria
    Athanasiou, Antonios
    Paraskevaidi, Maria
    Mitra, Anita
    Kalliala, Ilkka
    Martin-Hirsch, Pierre
    Arbyn, Marc
    Bennett, Phillip
    Paraskevaidis, Evangelos
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 354
  • [9] Surgery for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
    Martin-Hirsch, Pierre P. L.
    Paraskevaidis, Evangelos
    Bryant, Andrew
    Dickinson, Heather O.
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2013, (12):
  • [10] 2012 Updated Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Abnormal Cervical Cancer Screening Tests and Cancer Precursors
    Massad, L. Stewart
    Einstein, Mark H.
    Huh, Warner K.
    Katki, Hormuzd A.
    Kinney, Walter K.
    Schiffman, Mark
    Solomon, Diane
    Wentzensen, Nicolas
    Lawson, Herschel W.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 121 (04) : 829 - 846