Modeling Stem Water Potential by Separating the Effects of Soil Water Availability and Climatic Conditions on Water Status in Grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.)

被引:41
|
作者
Suter, Bruno [1 ,2 ]
Triolo, Roberta [2 ]
Pernet, David [2 ]
Dai, Zhanwu [1 ]
Van Leeuwen, Cornelis [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bordeaux, INRA, Bordeaux Sci Agro, EGFV,ISVV, F-33882 Villenave Dornon, France
[2] SOVIVINS, F-33650 Bordeaux, France
来源
FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE | 2019年 / 10卷
关键词
grapevine; water status; stem water potential; predawn leaf water potential; maximum air temperature; modeling; VAPOR-PRESSURE DEFICIT; DAILY TRUNK SHRINKAGE; ANISOHYDRIC BEHAVIOR; SENSITIVE INDICATOR; PREDAWN LEAF; SAP FLOW; IRRIGATION; PLANT; TREES; RESPONSES;
D O I
10.3389/fpls.2019.01485
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Measuring seasonal plant water status is critical in choosing appropriate management strategies to ensure yields and quality of agricultural products, particularly in a context of climate change. Water status of grapevines is known to be a key factor for yield, grape composition, and wine quality. Predawn leaf water potential (PLWP) and stem water potential (SWP) proved to be simple and precise indicators for assessing grapevine water status and subsequent same-day spatial comparisons. A drawback of SWP is that it does not allow for temporal comparisons, because the measured value is impacted both by soil water availability and climatic conditions on the day of measurement. The objectives of this study are i) to provide a model that separates the effect of soil water content from the effect of climatic conditions on the SWP value and ii) to standardize the SWP value to a value under predefined reference climatic conditions in order to compare SWP values collected under different climatic conditions. SWP and PLWP were temporally assessed on three soil types in Saint-emilion (Bordeaux, France) in 2015 and on five soil types in Margaux (Bordeaux, France) in 2018 using a pressure chamber. SWP measurements on two consecutive days with contrasting climatic conditions allowed to assess the impact of these conditions on SWP values. A large portion of the variability in SWP values was explained by PLWP. Model selection further showed that the addition of maximum air temperature and seasonality explained a significant amount of the remaining variability in SWP values. SWP values could be successfully standardized to a theoretical value under reference climatic conditions, which allows for temporal comparisons of SWP values. A plant-based measurement, such as the water potential, can be considered as the most straightforward indicator of plant water status as it integrates the effects of soil, plant, and atmospheric conditions. More precise interpretation of SWP values provides winegrowers with a tool to more adequately implement short- and long-term management strategies to adapt to drought in order to ensure yield and grape quality.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Photoinhibition of photosynthesis in water deficit leaves of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) plants
    Bertamini, M.
    Zulini, L.
    Zorer, R.
    Muthuchelian, K.
    Nedunchezhian, N.
    PHOTOSYNTHETICA, 2007, 45 (03) : 426 - 432
  • [12] Different water and light regimes affect ionome composition in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.)
    Sofo, A.
    Scopa, A.
    Manfra, M.
    De Nisco, M.
    Tenore, G. C.
    Nuzzo, V.
    VITIS, 2013, 52 (01) : 13 - 20
  • [13] Effects of water stress on dry matter content and partitioning in four grapevine cultivars (Vitis vinifera L.)
    Gómez-Del-Campo, M
    Baeza, P
    Ruiz, C
    Lissarrague, JR
    JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL DES SCIENCES DE LA VIGNE ET DU VIN, 2005, 39 (01): : 1 - 10
  • [14] Early and late responses of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) to water deficit: a proteomics perspective
    Cramer, G. R.
    Hopper, D. W.
    Quilici, D. R.
    Woolsey, R. J.
    Cushman, J. C.
    Vincent, D.
    Van Sluyter, S. C.
    George, I.
    Haynes, P. A.
    IX INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON GRAPEVINE PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2017, 1157 : 263 - 272
  • [15] Effects of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) water status on water consumption, vegetative growth and grape quality: An irrigation scheduling application to achieve regulated deficit irrigation
    Acevedo-Opazo, C.
    Ortega-Farias, S.
    Fuentes, S.
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2010, 97 (07) : 956 - 964
  • [16] Changes in leaf phenolic compounds in two grapevine varieties (Vitis vinifera L.) grown in different water conditions
    Scalabrelli, G.
    Saracini, E.
    Remorini, D.
    Massai, R.
    Tattini, M.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON ADVANCES IN GRAPEVINE AND WINE RESEARCH, 2007, (754): : 295 - +
  • [17] Discrimination ability of leaf and stem water potential at different times of the day through a meta-analysis in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.)
    Santesteban, L. G.
    Miranda, C.
    Marin, D.
    Sesma, B.
    Intrigliolo, D. S.
    Miras-Avalos, J. M.
    Escalona, J. M.
    Montoro, A.
    de Herralde, F.
    Baeza, P.
    Romero, P.
    Yuste, J.
    Uriarte, D.
    Martinez-Gascuena, J.
    Cancela, J. J.
    Pinillos, V.
    Loidi, M.
    Urrestarazu, J.
    Royo, J. B.
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2019, 221 : 202 - 210
  • [18] Stem water potential is a sensitive indicator of grapevine water status
    Chone, X
    van Leeuwen, C
    Dubourdieu, D
    Gaudillere, JP
    ANNALS OF BOTANY, 2001, 87 (04) : 477 - 483
  • [19] Vegetative and Reproductive Growth Responses of Grapevine cv. 'Italia' (Vitis vinifera L.) Grafted on Different Rootstocks to Contrasting Soil Water Status
    Sabir, A.
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 18 (06): : 1681 - 1692
  • [20] Protein hydrolysates effects on grapevine (Vitis vinifera L., cv. Corvina) performance and water stress tolerance
    Boselli, M.
    Bahouaoui, M. A.
    Lachhab, N.
    Sanzani, S. M.
    Ferrara, G.
    Ippolito, A.
    SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE, 2019, 258