How do electronic risk assessment tools affect the communication and understanding of diagnostic uncertainty in the primary care consultation? A systematic review and thematic synthesis

被引:2
作者
Burns, Alex [1 ,2 ]
Donnelly, Brian [3 ]
Feyi-Waboso, Joshua [3 ]
Shephard, Elizabeth [1 ]
Calitri, Raff [1 ]
Tarrant, Mark [1 ,2 ]
Dean, Sarah Gerard [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Exeter, Coll Med & Hlth, Exeter, Devon, England
[2] PenARC, Exeter, Devon, England
[3] Univ Exeter, Med Sch, Exeter, Devon, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2022年 / 12卷 / 06期
关键词
primary care; qualitative research; risk management; GENERAL-PRACTICE CONSULTATIONS; DECISION-MAKING; CANCER; METAANALYSIS; BARRIERS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060101
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To conduct a systematic review and synthesise qualitative research of electronic risk assessment tools (eRATs) in primary care, examining how they affect the communication and understanding of diagnostic risk and uncertainty. eRATs are computer-based algorithms designed to help clinicians avoid missing important diagnoses, pick up possible symptoms early and facilitate shared decision-making. Design Systematic search, using predefined criteria of the published literature and synthesis of the qualitative data, using Thematic Synthesis. Database searches on 27 November 2019 were of MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and Web of Science, and a secondary search of the references of included articles. Included studies were those involving electronic risk assessment or decision support, pertaining to diagnosis in primary care, where qualitative data were presented. Non-empirical studies and non-English language studies were excluded. 5971 unique studies were identified of which 441 underwent full-text review. 26 studies were included for data extraction. A further two were found from citation searches. Quality appraisal was via the CASP (Critical Appraisal Skills Program) tool. Data extraction was via line by line coding. A thematic synthesis was performed. Setting Primary care. Results eRATs included differential diagnosis suggestion tools, tools which produce a future risk of disease development or recurrence or calculate a risk of current undiagnosed disease. Analytical themes were developed to describe separate aspects of the clinical consultation where risk and uncertainty are both central and altered via the use of an eRAT: 'Novel risk', 'Risk refinement', 'Autonomy', 'Communication', 'Fear' and 'Mistrust'. Conclusion eRATs may improve the understanding and communication of risk in the primary care consultation. The themes of 'Fear' and 'Mistrust' could represent potential challenges with eRATs.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2018, CRITICAL APPRAISAL S
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2017, PULSE TODAY PULSE MA
[3]   Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review [J].
Barnett-Page, Elaine ;
Thomas, James .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2009, 9
[4]   Patient centred diagnosis: sharing diagnostic decisions with patients in clinical practice [J].
Berger, Zackary D. ;
Brito, Juan P. ;
Singh, Naykky ;
Kannan, Suraj ;
Hinson, Jeremiah S. ;
Hess, Erik P. ;
Haskell, Helen ;
Montori, Victor M. ;
Newman-Toker, David E. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 359 :j4218
[5]   Dealing with low-incidence serious diseases in general practice [J].
Buntinx, Frank ;
Mant, David ;
Van den Bruel, Ann ;
Donner-Banzhof, Norbert ;
Dinant, Geert-Jan .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2011, 61 (582) :43-46
[6]  
Burns A., 2020, PROSPERO INT PROSPEC
[7]  
Campbell JL., 2019, Health Serv Deliv Res, V7, P1
[8]  
Chartash David, 2019, MDM Policy Pract, V4, p2381468319868968, DOI 10.1177/2381468319868968
[9]   Implementing a QCancer risk tool into general practice consultations: an exploratory study using simulated consultations with Australian general practitioners [J].
Chiang, P. P-C ;
Glance, D. ;
Walker, J. ;
Walter, F. M. ;
Emery, J. D. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2015, 112 :S77-S83
[10]   Decision support toots to improve cancer diagnostic decision making in primary care: a systematic review [J].
Chima, Sophie ;
Reece, Jeanette C. ;
Milley, Kristi ;
Milton, Shakira ;
McIntosh, Jennifer G. ;
Emery, Jon D. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2019, 69 (689) :E809-E818