Public participation in decision-making processes in the planning for nature parks: the case of Istanbul's Belgrad Forest

被引:1
作者
Elvan, Osman Devrim [1 ]
Yildirim, Hasan Tezcan [2 ]
Birben, Ustuner [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Univ, Dept Environm & Forestry Law, Fac Forestry, TR-34473 Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Istanbul Univ, Dept Forest Policy & Adm, Fac Forestry, TR-34473 Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Cankiri Karatekin Univ, Dept Forest Econ, Fac Forestry, TR-18200 Cankiri, Turkey
关键词
Urban; Environment; Forest; Public participation; Conservation; Sustainability; URBAN FORESTRY;
D O I
10.1007/s10661-021-09291-9
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Belgrad Forest is one of the most visited forest areas in Istanbul and contains nine nature parks which are open to visitors and very popular. This study examines decision-making processes of the planning for these areas. To measure public participation in and approaches to the decision-making processes, a questionnaire was given to 1.103 visitors. It has been observed that the public does not participate in decision-making processes, although the public does have a role in legislation for the forest. Participants especially wanted to have input were determined to be ways of using the forest and ensuring that safety precautions and cleanliness were addressed. A SWOT analysis was carried out with the responsible groups and discussed approaches to planning, legislation, and implementation. The conclusion was that human pressure on nature parks should be reduced. It was suggested that non-governmental organizations should play an important role in decision-making mechanisms, as should individuals.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Participation of the Lay Public in Decision-Making for Benefit Coverage of National Health Insurance in South Korea [J].
Oh, Juhwan ;
Ko, Young ;
Alley, Allison Baer ;
Kwon, Soonman .
HEALTH SYSTEMS & REFORM, 2015, 1 (01) :62-71
[42]   Choosing Sustainable and Traditional Public Transportation Alternatives Using a Novel Decision-Making Framework Considering Passengers' Travel Behaviors: A Case Study of Istanbul [J].
Simsek, Pelin Busra ;
Ozdemir, Akin ;
Kosunalp, Selahattin ;
Iliev, Teodor .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2025, 17 (13)
[43]   From Public Participation to Co-Creation in the Cultural Heritage Management Decision-Making Process [J].
Grcheva, Olgica ;
Oktay Vehbi, Beser .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (16)
[44]   Elusive Public Participation: Citizen Decision-Making in Budget Formulation Process in the City of Harare, Zimbabwe [J].
Masvaure S. .
Urban Forum, 2016, 27 (4) :447-463
[45]   Trend of Community's Participation in Environmental Decision-making Process Under EIA: A Study [J].
Parikh, Madhuri ;
Dash, Bishwa Kalyan ;
Hota, Deba Ranjan .
ASIAN JOURNAL OF WATER ENVIRONMENT AND POLLUTION, 2022, 19 (02) :101-107
[46]   Management planning guidance for protected sites in the UK; a comparison of decision-making processes in nine guides [J].
Rowell, T. A. .
JOURNAL FOR NATURE CONSERVATION, 2009, 17 (03) :168-180
[47]   Stakeholder participation in decision-making processes for marine and coastal protected areas: Case studies of the south-western Gulf of California, Mexico [J].
Havard, Leila ;
Brigand, Louis ;
Carino, Micheline .
OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2015, 116 :116-131
[48]   An aggregating method to big group decision-making problem for the public participation problem under the Chinese situation [J].
You, Xinshang ;
Yang, Qing .
JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2019, 36 (01) :487-504
[49]   Large-Scale Group Decision-Making Method with Public Participation and Its Application in Urban Management [J].
Niu, Xiuhong ;
Song, Yongming ;
Xu, Zhongwen .
MATHEMATICS, 2024, 12 (16)
[50]   The application of nested-game theory in the public participation mechanism in the decision-making of large engineering projects [J].
Pang Yongshi ;
Xie Shufeng ;
Jiang Shasha .
ENGINEERING AND RISK MANAGEMENT, 2011, 1 :142-146