Public participation in decision-making processes in the planning for nature parks: the case of Istanbul's Belgrad Forest

被引:1
作者
Elvan, Osman Devrim [1 ]
Yildirim, Hasan Tezcan [2 ]
Birben, Ustuner [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Univ, Dept Environm & Forestry Law, Fac Forestry, TR-34473 Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Istanbul Univ, Dept Forest Policy & Adm, Fac Forestry, TR-34473 Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Cankiri Karatekin Univ, Dept Forest Econ, Fac Forestry, TR-18200 Cankiri, Turkey
关键词
Urban; Environment; Forest; Public participation; Conservation; Sustainability; URBAN FORESTRY;
D O I
10.1007/s10661-021-09291-9
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Belgrad Forest is one of the most visited forest areas in Istanbul and contains nine nature parks which are open to visitors and very popular. This study examines decision-making processes of the planning for these areas. To measure public participation in and approaches to the decision-making processes, a questionnaire was given to 1.103 visitors. It has been observed that the public does not participate in decision-making processes, although the public does have a role in legislation for the forest. Participants especially wanted to have input were determined to be ways of using the forest and ensuring that safety precautions and cleanliness were addressed. A SWOT analysis was carried out with the responsible groups and discussed approaches to planning, legislation, and implementation. The conclusion was that human pressure on nature parks should be reduced. It was suggested that non-governmental organizations should play an important role in decision-making mechanisms, as should individuals.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Electoral Referendum as Institution of Public Participation in Government Decision-Making in Organizing Electoral Process [J].
Grishin, Nikolai .
POLITEIA-JOURNAL OF POLITICAL THEORY POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY AND SOCIOLOGY OF POLITICS, 2016, 83 (04) :128-+
[32]   Public Participation Based Interactive Decision-making Model for Brownfield Redevelopment Projects (BRPs) [J].
Geng, Lise ;
Zhu, Yuming ;
Lin, Hongli ;
Ahmad, Naveed .
2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS (SMC), 2017, :3323-3328
[33]   Decision making, procedural compliance, and outcomes definition in US forest service planning processes [J].
Stern, Marc J. ;
Predmore, S. Andrew .
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2011, 31 (03) :271-278
[34]   Participation of society in environmental decision-making processes: the cases of the State Public Prosecutor's Office and the Municipal Council of Environment Defense in Sao Carlos-SP [J].
de Oliveira e Peixoto, Dante Jose ;
Montano, Marcelo .
DESENVOLVIMENTO E MEIO AMBIENTE, 2023, 61 :304-331
[35]   Changing Urban Governance in New Zealand: Public Participation and Democratic Legitimacy in Local Authority Planning and Decision-Making 1989-2014 [J].
Cheyne, Christine .
URBAN POLICY AND RESEARCH, 2015, 33 (04) :416-432
[36]   A novel decision-making support model based on value of time for public transport planning [J].
Gulhan, Gorkem ;
Ozuysal, Mustafa .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-TRANSPORT, 2020, 173 (01) :39-50
[37]   ?Going through the dance steps?: Instrumentality, frustration and performativity in processes of formal public participation in decision-making on shale development in the United Kingdom [J].
Williams, Laurence J. ;
Martin, Abigail ;
Stirling, Andy .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2022, 92
[38]   Democratic Legitimacy of the Forest Sector and Nature Conservation Decision-Making in Finnish Print Media Discussion [J].
Rantala, Tapio .
SILVA FENNICA, 2011, 45 (01) :111-138
[39]   Women's participation in environmental decision-making: Quasi-experimental evidence from northern Kenya [J].
Grillos, Tara .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 108 :115-130
[40]   Public Participation as Participatory Communication in Environmental Policy Decision-Making: From Concepts to Structured Conversations [J].
Walker, Gregg B. .
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMUNICATION-A JOURNAL OF NATURE AND CULTURE, 2007, 1 (01) :99-110