An indoor environmental quality assessment of office spaces at an urban Australian university

被引:23
作者
Woo, Jin [1 ,2 ]
Rajagopalan, Priyadarsini [1 ,2 ]
Francis, Matthew [1 ,2 ]
Garnawat, Prachi [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] RMIT Univ, Sch Property Construct, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] RMIT Univ, Project Management, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
University building; indoor environmental quality (IEQ); open-plan office; perceived productivity; non-academic staff; OPEN-PLAN OFFICES; AIR-QUALITY; POSTOCCUPANCY EVALUATION; OCCUPANT COMFORT; PRODUCTIVITY; SATISFACTION; PERFORMANCE; BUILDINGS; DESIGN; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1080/09613218.2021.1944037
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This paper reports the results of a comprehensive indoor environmental quality (IEQ) evaluation conducted in seven office buildings at an Australian university. A mix of objective and subjective assessments was carried out and a total of 519 staff participated in the survey from various non-academic departments. Three types of buildings were included in this study: 'Heritage listed' (c.1880-1890s), 'Conventional' (c.1960-1980s) and 'Modern' (post 2000) office buildings. Although the measured IEQ conditions were relatively good with no significant fluctuation across the selected buildings, the discrepancy between objective IEQ data and subjective occupant evaluations was noted. The Modern building type designed with fully double-glazed facades showed the highest levels of overall comfort and satisfaction and perceived productivity, whereas the Conventional building type constructed during the late 20th-century period, notable for deep floor plates, had the lowest. The heritage listed type buildings had lower window to wall ratios, yet displayed improved occupant satisfaction across all IEQ areas over the conventional type buildings. The results support that building renovation and regular maintenance can improve occupant comfort and satisfaction within offices. The findings could be useful for property managers looking for strategies to improve the performance of their building stock.
引用
收藏
页码:842 / 858
页数:17
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]  
Abbaszadeh S., 2006, P HLTH BUILDINGS 200, V3, P365
[2]   Occupant productivity and office indoor environment quality: A review of the literature [J].
Al Horr, Yousef ;
Arif, Mohammed ;
Kaushik, Amit ;
Mazroei, Ahmed ;
Katafygiotou, Martha ;
Elsarrag, Esam .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 105 :369-389
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Standard Guide for Using Indoor Carbon Dioxide Concentrations to Evaluate Indoor Air Quality and Ventilation, DOI [10.1520/D6245-18, DOI 10.1520/D6245-18]
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2006, 16801 ASNZS SAI GLOB
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Creating the Productive Workplace: Places to Work Creatively
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2016, 2107 ASNZS SAI GLOB
[7]  
ASHRAE, 2017, ASHRAE55
[8]   Indoor environmental quality factors that matter to workplace occupants: an 11-year-benchmark study [J].
Bae, Suyeon ;
Martin, Caren S. ;
Asojo, Abimbola O. .
BUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION, 2021, 49 (04) :445-459
[9]   The open-plan academy: space, control and the undermining of professional identity [J].
Baldry, Chris ;
Barnes, Alison .
WORK EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIETY, 2012, 26 (02) :228-245
[10]   The impact of the 'open' workspace on human collaboration [J].
Bernstein, Ethan S. ;
Turban, Stephen .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 373 (1753)