Indices of cardiovascular function derived from peripheral pulse wave analysis using radial applanation tonometry: a measurement repeatability study

被引:59
作者
Crilly, Mike
Coch, Christoph
Bruce, Margaret
Clark, Hazel
Williams, David
机构
[1] Univ Aberdeen, Sch Med, Dept Publ Hlth, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, Scotland
[2] Bonn Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Pharmacol, Bonn, Germany
[3] Aberdeen Royal Infirm, Dept Clin Pharmacol, Aberdeen, Scotland
关键词
applanation tonometry; measurement error; pulse wave analysis; radial artery; reproducibility; ARTERIAL STIFFNESS; BLOOD-PRESSURE; AUGMENTATION INDEX; AORTIC PRESSURE; REPRODUCIBILITY; REFLECTIONS; RISK;
D O I
10.1177/1358863x07081134
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Pulse wave analysis (PWA) using applanation tonometry is a non-invasive technique for assessing cardiovascular function. It produces three important indices: ejection duration index (ED%), augmentation index adjusted for heart rate (AIX@75), and subendocardial viability ratio (SEVR%). The aim of this study was to assess within- and between-observer repeatability of these measurements. After resting supine for 15 minutes, 20 ambulant patients (16 male) in sinus rhythm underwent four PWA measurements on a single occasion. Two nurses (A & B) independently and alternately undertook PWA measurements using the same equipment (Omron HEM-757; SphygmoCor with Millar hand-held tonometer) blind to the other nurse's PWA measurements. Within- and between-observer differences were analysed using the Bland-Altman 'limits of agreement' approach (mean difference +/- 2 standard deviations, 2SD). Mean age was 56 (blood pressure, BP 136/79; pulse rate 64). BP/PWA measurements remained stable during assessment. Based on the average of two PWA measurements the mean 2SD between-observer difference in ED% was 0.3 +/- 2.0; AIX@75 1.0 +/- 3.9; and SEVR% 1.7 +/- 14.2. Based on a single PWA measurement the between-observer difference was ED% 0.3 +/- 3.3; AIX@75 1.7 +/- 6.9; and SEVR% 0.6 +/- 22.6. Within-observer differences for nurse-A were ED% 0.0 +/- 5.4; AIX@75 1.5 +/- 7.0; and SEVR% 1.7 +/- 39.0 (nurse-B: 0.1 +/- 3.8; 0.1 +/- 8.0; and 0.6 +/- 23.3, respectively). PWA demonstrates high levels of repeatability even when used by relatively inexperienced staff and has the potential to be included in the routine cardiovascular assessment of ambulant patients.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 197
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
[11]   Assessment of arterial stiffness in clinical practice [J].
Mackenzie, IS ;
Wilkinson, IB ;
Cockcroft, JR .
QJM-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 95 (02) :67-74
[12]   FROM PROMISING REPORT TO STANDARD PROCEDURE - 7 STAGES IN THE CAREER OF A MEDICAL INNOVATION [J].
MCKINLAY, JB .
MILBANK MEMORIAL FUND QUARTERLY-HEALTH AND SOCIETY, 1981, 59 (03) :374-411
[13]  
Nichols W.W., 2005, McDonald's Blood Flow in Arteries
[14]   Pulse wave analysis [J].
O'Rourke, MF ;
Pauca, A ;
Jiang, XJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2001, 51 (06) :507-522
[15]   Noninvasive assessment of arterial stiffness and risk of atherosclerotic events [J].
Oliver, JJ ;
Webb, DJ .
ARTERIOSCLEROSIS THROMBOSIS AND VASCULAR BIOLOGY, 2003, 23 (04) :554-566
[16]   Prospective evaluation of a method for estimating ascending aortic pressure from the radial artery pressure waveform [J].
Pauca, AL ;
O'Rourke, MF ;
Kon, ND .
HYPERTENSION, 2001, 38 (04) :932-937
[17]  
Savage MT, 2002, CLIN SCI, V103, P59
[18]   The reproducibility of central aortic blood pressure measurements in healthy subjects using applanation tonometry and sphygmocardiography [J].
Siebenhofer, A ;
Kemp, CRW ;
Sutton, AJ ;
Williams, B .
JOURNAL OF HUMAN HYPERTENSION, 1999, 13 (09) :625-629
[19]   May subclinical arterial disease help to better detect and treat high-risk asymptomatic individuals? [J].
Simon, Alain ;
Levenson, Jaime .
JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2005, 23 (11) :1939-1945
[20]   Clinical applications of arterial stiffness, task force III: Recommendations for user procedures [J].
Van Bortel, LM ;
Duprez, D ;
Starmans-Kool, MJ ;
Safar, ME ;
Giannattasio, C ;
Cockcroft, J ;
Kaiser, DR ;
Thuillez, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2002, 15 (05) :445-452