Sex Differences in the Relationships between School Bullying and Executive Functions in Adolescence

被引:4
作者
Potard, C. [1 ]
Henry, A. [2 ]
Pochon, R. [2 ]
Kubiszewski, V. [3 ,4 ]
Combes, C. [1 ]
Broute, V. [5 ]
Roy, A. [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Angers, Dept Psychol, Psychol Lab Pays De La Loire, EA 4638,LPPL, Angers, France
[2] Univ Reims, Dept Psychol, Cognit Hlth & Soc Lab C2S 6291, EA 6291, Reims, France
[3] Univ Bourgogne Franche Comte, Psychol Lab EA3188, Besancon, France
[4] Univ Bourgogne Franche Comte, FR EDUC, Besancon, France
[5] Univ Angers, Dept Psychol, Angers, France
[6] Nantes Univ Hosp, Reference Ctr Learning Disabil, Nantes, France
关键词
School bullying; executive functions; bullying roles; victimization; adolescence; PEER VICTIMIZATION; AGGRESSIVE-BEHAVIOR; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; CHILDREN; CHILDHOOD; PREVALENCE; ABUSE; CONSEQUENCES; ASSOCIATIONS; PRESCHOOL;
D O I
10.1080/15388220.2021.1956506
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
The aim of the current study was to examine the associations between different types of executive functions (EFs) and bullying involvement in adolescent boys and girls. A self-report questionnaire was administered to 385 adolescents (mean age = 12.6 years) from nine junior high schools in France. Participants were divided into four bullying groups: pure victims, bully-victims, pure bullies, and noninvolved. Their parents completed the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function. Results showed that adolescents with inhibition problems were more likely to be victims or bully-victims. Furthermore, working memory, organization of materials, and monitoring problems appeared to be associated with the risk of being a victim for girls. Bully-victims, especially girls, performed more poorly on cool and hot EF problems than controls. Pure bullies did not exhibit any EF impairments. The screening of EF abilities and the implementation of evidence-based EF promotion programs are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:483 / 498
页数:16
相关论文
共 85 条
[21]   Violence, Crime, and Abuse Exposure in a National Sample of Children and Youth An Update [J].
Finkelhor, David ;
Turner, Heather A. ;
Shattuck, Anne ;
Hamby, Sherry L. .
JAMA PEDIATRICS, 2013, 167 (07) :614-621
[22]   Multigroup confirmatory factor analysis and structural invariance with age of the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF)-French version [J].
Fournet, Nathalie ;
Roulin, Jean-Luc ;
Monnier, Catherine ;
Atzeni, Thierry ;
Cosnefroy, Olivier ;
Le Gall, Didier ;
Roy, Arnaud .
CHILD NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 21 (03) :379-398
[23]   From indirect aggression to invisible aggression: A conceptual view on bullying and peer group manipulation [J].
Garandeau, Claire F. ;
Cillessen, Antonius H. N. .
AGGRESSION AND VIOLENT BEHAVIOR, 2006, 11 (06) :612-625
[24]   Association Between Bullying and Psychosomatic Problems: A Meta-analysis [J].
Gini, Gianluca ;
Pozzoli, Tiziana .
PEDIATRICS, 2009, 123 (03) :1059-1065
[25]   Confirmatory factor analysis of the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) in a clinical sample [J].
Gioia, GA ;
Isquith, PK ;
Retzlaff, PD ;
Espy, KA .
CHILD NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 8 (04) :249-257
[26]   Sex differences in brain and behavior in adolescence: Findings from the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort [J].
Gur, Raquel E. ;
Gur, Ruben C. .
NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2016, 70 :159-170
[27]   Exploring the differential associations between components of executive functioning and reactive and proactive aggression [J].
Hecht, Lisa K. ;
Latzman, Robert D. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 40 (01) :62-74
[28]   Linking Executive Function and Peer Problems from Early Childhood Through Middle Adolescence [J].
Holmes, Christopher J. ;
Kim-Spoon, Jungmeen ;
Deater-Deckard, Kirby .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 44 (01) :31-42
[29]   A review of research on bullying and peer victimization in school: An ecological system analysis [J].
Hong, Jun Sung ;
Espelage, Dorothy L. .
AGGRESSION AND VIOLENT BEHAVIOR, 2012, 17 (04) :311-322
[30]  
Hughes C, 2000, J CHILD PSYCHOL PSYC, V41, P169, DOI 10.1017/S0021963099005193