Sex Differences in the Relationships between School Bullying and Executive Functions in Adolescence

被引:4
作者
Potard, C. [1 ]
Henry, A. [2 ]
Pochon, R. [2 ]
Kubiszewski, V. [3 ,4 ]
Combes, C. [1 ]
Broute, V. [5 ]
Roy, A. [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Angers, Dept Psychol, Psychol Lab Pays De La Loire, EA 4638,LPPL, Angers, France
[2] Univ Reims, Dept Psychol, Cognit Hlth & Soc Lab C2S 6291, EA 6291, Reims, France
[3] Univ Bourgogne Franche Comte, Psychol Lab EA3188, Besancon, France
[4] Univ Bourgogne Franche Comte, FR EDUC, Besancon, France
[5] Univ Angers, Dept Psychol, Angers, France
[6] Nantes Univ Hosp, Reference Ctr Learning Disabil, Nantes, France
关键词
School bullying; executive functions; bullying roles; victimization; adolescence; PEER VICTIMIZATION; AGGRESSIVE-BEHAVIOR; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; CHILDREN; CHILDHOOD; PREVALENCE; ABUSE; CONSEQUENCES; ASSOCIATIONS; PRESCHOOL;
D O I
10.1080/15388220.2021.1956506
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
The aim of the current study was to examine the associations between different types of executive functions (EFs) and bullying involvement in adolescent boys and girls. A self-report questionnaire was administered to 385 adolescents (mean age = 12.6 years) from nine junior high schools in France. Participants were divided into four bullying groups: pure victims, bully-victims, pure bullies, and noninvolved. Their parents completed the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function. Results showed that adolescents with inhibition problems were more likely to be victims or bully-victims. Furthermore, working memory, organization of materials, and monitoring problems appeared to be associated with the risk of being a victim for girls. Bully-victims, especially girls, performed more poorly on cool and hot EF problems than controls. Pure bullies did not exhibit any EF impairments. The screening of EF abilities and the implementation of evidence-based EF promotion programs are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:483 / 498
页数:16
相关论文
共 85 条
[1]   Adjust for Multiple Comparisons? It's Not That Simple [J].
Althouse, Andrew D. .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2016, 101 (05) :1644-1645
[2]   Cyberbullying: Concepts, theories, and correlates informing evidence-based best practices for prevention [J].
Ansary, Nadia S. .
AGGRESSION AND VIOLENT BEHAVIOR, 2020, 50
[3]   The influence of the parents' educational level on the development of executive functions [J].
Ardila, A ;
Rosselli, W ;
Matute, E ;
Guajardo, S .
DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 28 (01) :539-560
[4]   Social exclusion impairs self-regulation [J].
Baumeister, RF ;
DeWall, CN ;
Ciarocco, NJ ;
Twenge, JM .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 88 (04) :589-604
[5]   SOCIAL: An Integrative Framework for the Development of Social Skills [J].
Beauchamp, Miriam H. ;
Anderson, Vicki .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2010, 136 (01) :39-64
[6]   A Developmental Perspective on Executive Function [J].
Best, John R. ;
Miller, Patricia H. .
CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 2010, 81 (06) :1641-1660
[7]   Social intelligence minus empathy = aggression? [J].
Björkqvist, K ;
Österman, K ;
Kaukiainen, A .
AGGRESSION AND VIOLENT BEHAVIOR, 2000, 5 (02) :191-200
[8]   Development of the adolescent brain: implications for executive function and social cognition [J].
Blakemore, SJ ;
Choudhury, S .
JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2006, 47 (3-4) :296-312
[9]   Aggression, social cognitions, anger and sadness in bullies and victims [J].
Camodeca, M ;
Goossens, FA .
JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2005, 46 (02) :186-197
[10]   Bullying and victimization among school-age children: Stability and links to proactive and reactive aggression [J].
Camodeca, M ;
Goossens, FA ;
Terwogt, MM ;
Schuengel, C .
SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT, 2002, 11 (03) :332-345