Climate econometric models indicate solar geoengineering would reduce inter-country income inequality

被引:43
作者
Harding, Anthony R. [1 ,2 ]
Ricke, Katharine [1 ,3 ]
Heyen, Daniel [4 ]
MacMartin, Douglas G. [5 ]
Moreno-Cruz, Juan [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Sch Global Policy & Strategy, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[2] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Econ, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Diego, Scripps Inst Oceanog, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[4] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Ctr Econ Res, Zurich, Switzerland
[5] Cornell Univ, Mech & Aerosp Engn, Ithaca, NY USA
[6] Univ Waterloo, Sch Environm Enterprise & Dev, Waterloo, ON, Canada
关键词
ECONOMIC-GROWTH; TEMPERATURE; IMPACTS; DAMAGES; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1038/s41467-019-13957-x
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Exploring heterogeneity in the economic impacts of solar geoengineering is a fundamental step towards understanding the risk tradeoff associated with a geoengineering option. To evaluate impacts of solar geoengineering and greenhouse gas-driven climate change on equal terms, we apply macroeconomic impact models that have been widely applied to climate change impacts assessment. Combining historical evidence with climate simulations of mean annual temperature and precipitation, we project socio-economic outcomes under high anthropogenic emissions for stylized climate scenarios in which global temperatures are stabilized or over-cooled by blocking solar radiation. We find impacts of climate changes on global GDP-per-capita by the end of the century are temperature-driven, highly dispersed, and model dependent. Across all model specifications, however, income inequality between countries is lower with solar geoengineering. Consistent reduction in inter-country inequality can inform discussions of the distribution of impacts of solar geoengineering, a topic of concern in geoengineering ethics and governance debates.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2012, World Development Indicators 2012
[2]  
Armstrong J., 1998, Protecting the ozone layer: lessons, models, and prospects, P173, DOI [10.1007/978-1-4615-5585-826, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4615-5585-826]
[3]   Impact of geoengineering schemes on the global hydrological cycle [J].
Bala, G. ;
Duffy, P. B. ;
Taylor, K. E. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2008, 105 (22) :7664-7669
[4]   TRENDS IN RAINFALL AND ECONOMIC GROWTH IN AFRICA: A NEGLECTED CAUSE OF THE AFRICAN GROWTH TRAGEDY [J].
Barrios, Salvador ;
Bertinelli, Luisito ;
Strobl, Eric .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2010, 92 (02) :350-366
[5]  
Barros V, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT A: GLOBAL AND SECTORAL ASPECTS, pIX
[6]   The Use of Panel Models in Assessments of Climate Impacts on Agriculture [J].
Blanc, Elodie ;
Schlenker, Wolfram .
REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2017, 11 (02) :258-279
[7]   The who, what, and wherefore of geoengineering governance [J].
Bodansky, Daniel .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2013, 121 (03) :539-551
[8]   THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF OCEAN ACIDIFICATION ON CORAL REEFS [J].
Brander, Luke M. ;
Rehdanz, Katrin ;
Tol, Richard S. J. ;
van Beukering, Pieter J. H. .
CLIMATE CHANGE ECONOMICS, 2012, 3 (01)
[9]   Hydroclimate risk to economic growth in sub-Saharan Africa [J].
Brown, Casey ;
Meeks, Robyn ;
Hunu, Kenneth ;
Yu, Winston .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2011, 106 (04) :621-647
[10]   Large potential reduction in economic damages under UN mitigation targets [J].
Burke, Marshall ;
Davis, W. Matthew ;
Diffenbaugh, Noah S. .
NATURE, 2018, 557 (7706) :549-+