Interest Groups in Multi-Level Contexts: European Integration as Cross-Cutting Issue in Party-Interest Group Contacts

被引:4
作者
Berkhout, Joost [1 ]
Hanegraaff, Marcel [1 ]
Statsch, Patrick [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Polit Sci, NL-1001 NB Amsterdam, Netherlands
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
European integration; Euroscepticism; interest groups; political parties; POLITICAL-PARTIES; POLICY BANDWAGONS; POLITICIZATION; EUROSCEPTICISM; MOBILIZATION; NETHERLANDS; DEMANDS; TIMES;
D O I
10.17645/pag.v8i1.2516
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Policy-specific actor-constellations consisting of party- and group-representatives commonly drive the effective establishment of new policy programmes or changes in existing policies. In the EU multi-level system, the creation of such constellations is complicated because it practically requires consensus on two dimensions: the European public policy at stake and the issue of European integration. This means that, for interest groups with interests in particular policy domains, and with limited interest in the actual issue of European integration, non-Eurosceptic parties must be their main ally in their policy battles. We hypothesise that interest groups with relevant European domain-specific interests will ally with non-Eurosceptic parties, whereas interest groups whose interests are hardly affected by the European policy process will have party-political allies across the full range of positions on European integration. We assess this argument on the basis of an elite-survey of interest group leaders and study group-party dyads in several European countries (i.e., Belgium, Lithuania, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, and Slovenia) in a large number of policy domains. Our dependent variable is the group-party dyad and the main independent variables are the European policy interests of the group and the level of Euroscepticism of the party. We broadly find support for our hypotheses. The findings of our study speak to the debate concerning the implications of the politicisation of European integration and, more specifically, the way in which party-political polarisation of Europe may divide domestic interest group systems and potentially drive group and party systems apart.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 71
页数:11
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]   Political parties and interest groups: Disentangling complex relationships [J].
Allern, Elin H. ;
Bale, Tim .
PARTY POLITICS, 2012, 18 (01) :7-25
[2]   All about the money? A cross-national study of parties' relations with trade unions in 12 western democracies [J].
Allern, Elin Haugsgjerd ;
Hansen, Vibeke Woien ;
Otjes, Simon ;
Rasmussen, Anne ;
Roed, Maiken ;
Bale, Tim .
PARTY POLITICS, 2021, 27 (03) :407-417
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1980, POLITICS REGULATION
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Opposing Europe? The comparative party politics of Euroscepticism
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2009, 098 MPIFG
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2004, British Journal of Political Science
[7]   Interest niches and policy bandwagons: Patterns of interest group involvement in national politics [J].
Baumgartner, FR ;
Leech, BL .
JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2001, 63 (04) :1191-1213
[8]   A Theory of Political Parties: Groups, Policy Demands and Nominations in American Politics [J].
Bawn, Kathleen ;
Cohen, Martin ;
Karol, David ;
Masket, Seth ;
Noel, Hans ;
Zaller, John .
PERSPECTIVES ON POLITICS, 2012, 10 (03) :571-597
[9]  
BERKHOUT J, 2019, PARTY POLITICS
[10]   Testing for Interaction in Binary Logit and Probit Models: Is a Product Term Essential? [J].
Berry, William D. ;
DeMeritt, Jacqueline H. R. ;
Esarey, Justin .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2010, 54 (01) :248-266