The common rejection module in chronic rejection post lung transplantation

被引:28
|
作者
Sacreas, Annelore [1 ]
Yang, Joshua Y. C. [2 ]
Vanaudenaerde, Bart M. [1 ]
Sigdel, Tara K. [2 ]
Liberto, Juliane M. [2 ]
Damm, Izabella [2 ]
Verleden, Geert M. [1 ]
Vos, Robin [1 ]
Verleden, Stijn E. [1 ]
Sarwal, Minnie M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Chron Dis Metab & Ageing CHROMETA, Leuven Lung Transplant Unit, Leuven, Belgium
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Surg, Div Transplant Surg, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2018年 / 13卷 / 10期
关键词
BRONCHIOLITIS OBLITERANS SYNDROME; ALLOGRAFT DYSFUNCTION; EXPRESSION; BIOPSIES;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0205107
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Rationale Recent studies suggest that similar injury mechanisms are in place across different solid organ transplants, resulting in the identification of a common rejection module (CRM), consisting of 11 genes that are overexpressed during acute and, to a lesser extent, chronic allograft rejection. Objectives We wanted to evaluate the usefulness of the CRM module in identifying acute rejection (AR) and different phenotypes of chronic lung transplant rejection (CLAD), i.e., bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) and restrictive allograft syndrome (RAS), using transbronchial brushings, broncho-alveolar lavage (BAL) samples, and explant tissue. Methods Gene expression measurements for the 11 CRM genes (CD6, TAP1, CXCL10, CXCL9, INPP5D, ISG20, LCK, NKG7, PSMB9, RUNX3, and BASP1) were performed via qRT-PCR in 14 transbronchial brushings (AR, n = 4; no AR, n = 10), 32 BAL samples (stable, n = 13; AR, n = 8; BOS, n = 9; RAS, n = 10), and 44 tissue specimens (unused donor lungs, n = 15; BOS, n = 13; RAS, n = 16). A geometric mean score was calculated to quantitate overall burden of immune injury and a new computational model was built for the most significant genes in lung transplant injury. Results Acute rejection showed a significant difference in almost every gene analysed, validating previous observations from microarray analysis. RAS tissue demonstrated a higher geometric mean score (6.35) compared to donor tissue (4.09, p = 0.018). Analysis of individual CRM genes showed an increased expression of ISG20, CXCL10 and CXCL9 in RAS. In BAL samples, no differences were detected in gene expression or geometric mean scores between the various groups (stable, 5.15; AR, 5.81; BOS, 5.62; RAS, 7.31). A newly modelled 2-gene tissue CRM score did not demonstrate any difference between BOS and RAS (p>0.05). However, the model was able to discriminate RAS from BOS tissue (AUC = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.55-0.94, p = 0.025). Conclusion Transcriptional tissue analysis for CRM genes in CLAD can identify acute rejection and distinguish RAS from BOS. The immune activation in RAS seems similar to acute rejection after kidney/liver/heart transplantation.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] New Insights into Acute and Chronic Lung Rejection
    Neuringer, Isabel
    Medaiyese, Ayorinde
    McNeillie, Patrick
    Budd, Steven
    Aris, Robert
    CURRENT RESPIRATORY MEDICINE REVIEWS, 2008, 4 (01) : 40 - 51
  • [22] Role of Circulating MicroRNAs in the Immunopathogenesis of Rejection After Pediatric Lung Transplantation
    Xu, Zhongping
    Yang, Wei
    Steward, Nancy
    Sweet, Stuart C.
    Danziger-Isakov, Lara
    Heeger, Peter S.
    Mohanakumar, Thalachallour
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 101 (10) : 2461 - 2468
  • [23] Surveillance for acute cellular rejection after lung transplantation
    Greer, Mark
    Werlein, Christopher
    Jonigk, Danny
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2020, 8 (06)
  • [24] Detection, classification, and management of rejection after lung transplantation
    Parulekar, Amit D.
    Kao, Christina C.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2019, 11 : S1732 - S1739
  • [25] The Immunopathology of Pulmonary Rejection after Murine Lung Transplantation
    Kaes, Janne
    Pollenus, Emilie
    Hooft, Charlotte
    Liu, Hengshuo
    Aelbrecht, Celine
    Cambier, Seppe
    Jin, Xin
    Van Slambrouck, Jan
    Beeckmans, Hanne
    Kerckhof, Pieterjan
    Velde, Greetje Vande
    Van Raemdonck, Dirk
    Yildirim, Ali oender
    van den Steen, Philippe E.
    Vos, Robin
    Ceulemans, Laurens J.
    Vanaudenaerde, Bart M.
    CELLS, 2024, 13 (03)
  • [26] Antibody-mediated rejection after lung transplantation
    Bery, Amit I.
    Hachem, Ramsey R.
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2020, 8 (06)
  • [27] Pattern and predictors of early rejection after lung transplantation
    Dabbs, AD
    Hoffman, LA
    Iacono, AT
    Wells, CL
    Grgurich, W
    Zullo, TG
    McCurry, KR
    Dauber, JH
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2003, 12 (06) : 497 - 507
  • [28] Efficacy of Total Lymphoid Irradiation in Azithromycin Nonresponsive Chronic Allograft Rejection After Lung Transplantation
    Verleden, G. M.
    Lievens, Y.
    Dupont, L. J.
    Van Raemdonck, D. E.
    De Vleeschauwer, S. I.
    Vos, R.
    Vanaudenaerde, B. M.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2009, 41 (05) : 1816 - 1820
  • [29] Antibody-mediated rejection of the lung: A consensus report of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation
    Levine, Deborah J.
    Glanville, Allan R.
    Aboyoun, Christina
    Belperio, John
    Benden, Christian
    Berry, Gerald J.
    Hachem, Ramsey
    Hayes, Don, Jr.
    Neil, Desley
    Reinsmoen, Nancy L.
    Snyder, Laurie D.
    Sweet, Stuart
    Tyan, Dolly
    Verleden, Geert
    Westall, Glen
    Yusen, Roger D.
    Zamora, Martin
    Zeevi, Adriana
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2016, 35 (04) : 397 - 406
  • [30] Current challenges and opportunities in the management of antibody-mediated rejection in lung transplantation
    Hulbert, Amanda L.
    Pavlisko, Elizabeth N.
    Palmer, Scott M.
    CURRENT OPINION IN ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 23 (03) : 308 - 315