共 50 条
The common rejection module in chronic rejection post lung transplantation
被引:28
|作者:
Sacreas, Annelore
[1
]
Yang, Joshua Y. C.
[2
]
Vanaudenaerde, Bart M.
[1
]
Sigdel, Tara K.
[2
]
Liberto, Juliane M.
[2
]
Damm, Izabella
[2
]
Verleden, Geert M.
[1
]
Vos, Robin
[1
]
Verleden, Stijn E.
[1
]
Sarwal, Minnie M.
[2
]
机构:
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Chron Dis Metab & Ageing CHROMETA, Leuven Lung Transplant Unit, Leuven, Belgium
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Surg, Div Transplant Surg, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
来源:
PLOS ONE
|
2018年
/
13卷
/
10期
关键词:
BRONCHIOLITIS OBLITERANS SYNDROME;
ALLOGRAFT DYSFUNCTION;
EXPRESSION;
BIOPSIES;
D O I:
10.1371/journal.pone.0205107
中图分类号:
O [数理科学和化学];
P [天文学、地球科学];
Q [生物科学];
N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号:
07 ;
0710 ;
09 ;
摘要:
Rationale Recent studies suggest that similar injury mechanisms are in place across different solid organ transplants, resulting in the identification of a common rejection module (CRM), consisting of 11 genes that are overexpressed during acute and, to a lesser extent, chronic allograft rejection. Objectives We wanted to evaluate the usefulness of the CRM module in identifying acute rejection (AR) and different phenotypes of chronic lung transplant rejection (CLAD), i.e., bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) and restrictive allograft syndrome (RAS), using transbronchial brushings, broncho-alveolar lavage (BAL) samples, and explant tissue. Methods Gene expression measurements for the 11 CRM genes (CD6, TAP1, CXCL10, CXCL9, INPP5D, ISG20, LCK, NKG7, PSMB9, RUNX3, and BASP1) were performed via qRT-PCR in 14 transbronchial brushings (AR, n = 4; no AR, n = 10), 32 BAL samples (stable, n = 13; AR, n = 8; BOS, n = 9; RAS, n = 10), and 44 tissue specimens (unused donor lungs, n = 15; BOS, n = 13; RAS, n = 16). A geometric mean score was calculated to quantitate overall burden of immune injury and a new computational model was built for the most significant genes in lung transplant injury. Results Acute rejection showed a significant difference in almost every gene analysed, validating previous observations from microarray analysis. RAS tissue demonstrated a higher geometric mean score (6.35) compared to donor tissue (4.09, p = 0.018). Analysis of individual CRM genes showed an increased expression of ISG20, CXCL10 and CXCL9 in RAS. In BAL samples, no differences were detected in gene expression or geometric mean scores between the various groups (stable, 5.15; AR, 5.81; BOS, 5.62; RAS, 7.31). A newly modelled 2-gene tissue CRM score did not demonstrate any difference between BOS and RAS (p>0.05). However, the model was able to discriminate RAS from BOS tissue (AUC = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.55-0.94, p = 0.025). Conclusion Transcriptional tissue analysis for CRM genes in CLAD can identify acute rejection and distinguish RAS from BOS. The immune activation in RAS seems similar to acute rejection after kidney/liver/heart transplantation.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文