Assessment of Corneal Pachymetry Distribution and Morphologic Changes in Subclinical Keratoconus with Normal Biomechanics

被引:14
|
作者
Song, Peng [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Yang, Kaili [4 ]
Li, Pei [1 ]
Liu, Yu [1 ]
Liang, Dengfeng [1 ]
Ren, Shengwei [4 ]
Zeng, Qingyan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Aier Sch Ophthalmol, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Hankou Aier Eye Hosp, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
[3] Wuhan Aier Eye Inst, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
[4] Zhengzhou Univ, Peoples Hosp, Henan Eye Inst, Henan Prov Peoples Hosp,Henan Eye Hosp, Zhengzhou, Henan, Peoples R China
关键词
FELLOW EYES; TOMOGRAPHY; PARAMETERS; ECTASIA; ELEVATION; INDEX;
D O I
10.1155/2019/1748579
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Purpose. To investigate the pachymetry distribution of central cornea and morphologic changes in subclinical keratoconus with normal biomechanics and determine their potential benefit for the screening of very early keratoconus. Methods. This retrospective comparative study was performed in 33 clinically unaffected eyes with normal topography and biomechanics from 33 keratoconus patients with very asymmetric ectasia (VAE-NTB; Corvis Biomechanical Index defined) and 70 truly normal eyes from 70 age-matched subjects. Corneal topographic, tomographic, and biomechanical metrics were measured using Pentacam and Corvis ST. The distance and pachymetry difference between the corneal thinnest point and the apex were defined as DTCP-Apex and DPTCP-Apex, respectively, to evaluate the pachymetry distribution within the central cornea. The discriminatory power of metrics was analysed via the receiver operating characteristic curve. A logistic regression analysis was used to establish predictive models. Results. The parameters, DTCP-Apex and DPTCP-Apex, were significantly higher in VAE-NTB than those in normal eyes. For differentiating normal and VAE-NTB eyes, the Belin-Ambrosio deviation (BAD-D) showed the largest area under the curve (AUC; 0.799), followed by ARTmax (0.798), DTCP-Apex (0.771), tomography and biomechanical index (0.760), maximum pachymetry progression index (PPImax, 0.756), DPTCP-Apex (0.753), and back eccentricity (B_Ecc, 0.707) with no statistically significant differences among these AUCs. In the VAE-NTB group, the parameter B_Ecc was significantly and positively correlated with DTCP-Apex (P=0.011) and DPTCP-Apex (P=0.035), whereas the posterior elevation difference had a significant positive association with DPTCP-Apex (P=0.042). A model using the indices DTCP-Apex, B_Ecc, PPImax, and index of height asymmetry demonstrated the highest AUC of 0.846 with 91.43% specificity. Conclusions. Abnormal pachymetry distribution within the central cornea and subtle morphologic changes are detectable in subclinical keratoconus with normal biomechanics. This may improve VAE-NTB eyes detection.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] Corneal biomechanics in normal and subclinical keratoconus eyes
    Peyman, Alireza
    Sepahvand, Fatemeh
    Pourazizi, Mohsen
    Noorshargh, Pegah
    Forouhari, Ali
    BMC OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [2] Assessment of corneal biomechanics, tonometry and pachymetry with the Corvis ST in myopia
    Wang, Xiaorui
    McAlinden, Colm
    Zhang, Hongbing
    Yan, Jie
    Wang, Dan
    Wei, Wei
    Mi, Shengjian
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [3] Comparison of bilateral differential characteristics of corneal biomechanics between keratoconus and normal eyes
    Xian, Yiyong
    Zhao, Yu
    Sun, Ling
    Zhang, Xiaoyu
    Ding, Lan
    Liu, Zesheng
    Li, Yuan
    Ding, Yanlan
    Jiang, Lin
    Zhou, Xingtao
    Shen, Yang
    FRONTIERS IN BIOENGINEERING AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2023, 11
  • [4] Diagnostic Value of Corneal Epithelial and Stromal Thickness Distribution Profiles in Forme Fruste Keratoconus and Subclinical Keratoconus
    Toprak, Ibrahim
    Vega, Alfredo
    Alio del Barrio, Jorge L.
    Espla, Elias
    Cavas, Francisco
    Alio, Jorge L.
    CORNEA, 2021, 40 (01) : 61 - 72
  • [5] Dynamic corneal biomechanics in different cell layers: in keratoconus and normal eyes
    Alvani, Azam
    Hashemi, Hassan
    Pakravan, Mohammad
    Mahbod, Mirgholamreza
    Amanzadeh, Kazem
    Seyedian, Mohammad Amin
    Yaseri, Mehdi
    Jafarzadehpur, Ebrahim
    Fotouhi, Akbar
    OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 2021, 41 (02) : 414 - 423
  • [6] Differences in Posterior Corneal Features Between Normal Corneas and Subclinical Keratoconus
    Golan, Oren
    Hwang, Eric S.
    Lang, Paul
    Santhiago, Marcony R.
    Abulafia, Adi
    Touboul, David
    Krauthammer, Mark
    Smadja, David
    JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2018, 34 (10) : 664 - +
  • [7] Corneal Stress Distribution Evolves from Thickness-Driven in Normal Corneas to Curvature-Driven with Progression in Keratoconus
    Roberts, Cynthia J.
    Knoll, Kayla M.
    Mahmoud, Ashraf M.
    Hendershot, Andrew J.
    Yuhas, Phillip T.
    OPHTHALMOLOGY SCIENCE, 2024, 4 (02):
  • [8] Visual outcomes and corneal biomechanics after V4c implantable collamer lens implantation in subclinical keratoconus
    Li, Kangjun
    Wang, Zheng
    Zhang, Dexiu
    Wang, Shanshan
    Song, Xiaocui
    Li, Yaxin
    Wang, Ming X.
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2020, 46 (10) : 1339 - 1345
  • [9] Comprehensive Assessment of Corvis ST Biomechanical Indices in Normal and Keratoconus Corneas with Reference to Corneal Enantiomorphism
    Borderie, Vincent
    Beauruel, Juliette
    Cuyaubere, Roxane
    Georgeon, Cristina
    Memmi, Benjamin
    Sandali, Otman
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (02)
  • [10] Differences of Corneal Biomechanics Among Thin Normal Cornea, Forme-Fruste Keratoconus, and Cornea After SMILE
    Zhang, Di
    Tian, Lei
    Zhang, Haixia
    Zheng, Yan
    Fu, Caiyun
    Zhai, Changbin
    Jie, Ying
    Li, Lin
    FRONTIERS IN BIOENGINEERING AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2022, 10