Synergies and trade-offs in the management of lowland rural floodplains: an ecosystem services approach

被引:31
作者
Rouquette, J. R. [1 ,2 ]
Posthumus, H. [3 ,4 ]
Morris, J. [3 ]
Hess, T. M. [3 ]
Dawson, Q. L. [3 ]
Gowing, D. J. G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Open Univ, Dept Life Sci, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, Bucks, England
[2] Univ Sheffield, Dept Anim & Plant Sci, Sheffield S10 2TN, S Yorkshire, England
[3] Cranfield Univ, Sch Appl Sci, Dept Nat Resources, Cranfield MK43 0AL, Beds, England
[4] Univ Greenwich, Nat Resources Inst, Chatham ME4 4TB, Kent, England
来源
HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES | 2011年 / 56卷 / 08期
关键词
ecosystem services; floodplain; flood risk; land use; wetland; AGRICULTURE; FUTURE; LAND; BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION; VALUATION; IMPACTS; LEVEL;
D O I
10.1080/02626667.2011.629785
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Priorities for the management of lowland rural floodplains in many parts of Europe have changed from a focus on agricultural production towards multi-functional landscapes that provide a range of environmental, social and economic benefits to society. This paper uses an ecosystem services framework to explore alternative management scenarios with different objectives (production, biodiversity, floodwater storage, agri-environment and income) for two rural floodplains in England. Each scenario featured different types of land cover and hydrological management. The results revealed the key role of the hydrological regime in shaping ecosystem service provision in floodplains. Both conflicts and synergies were apparent. Scenarios with deep water tables and low flood frequencies had high scores for agricultural production and flood storage capacity, but low scores for environmental outcomes. Scenarios with shallow water tables and frequent flooding showed high scores for environmental and cultural outcomes, but at the cost of a reduced flood storage capacity and increased flood risk. The scope for multiple benefits has implications for the realignment of policies to realize extra value from floodplain ecosystems.
引用
收藏
页码:1566 / 1581
页数:16
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Ecosystems and Human Well Being: a Framework for Assessment
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1997, NATURES SERVICES SOC
[3]  
Barsoum N., 2005, ENGLISH NATURE RES R
[4]   What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units [J].
Boyd, James ;
Banzhaf, Spencer .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 63 (2-3) :616-626
[5]   The nature and value of ecosystem services: An overview highlighting hydrologic services [J].
Brauman, Kate A. ;
Daily, Gretchen C. ;
Duarte, T. Kaeo ;
Mooney, Harold A. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, 2007, 32 :67-98
[6]   The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital [J].
Costanza, R ;
dArge, R ;
deGroot, R ;
Farber, S ;
Grasso, M ;
Hannon, B ;
Limburg, K ;
Naeem, S ;
ONeill, RV ;
Paruelo, J ;
Raskin, RG ;
Sutton, P ;
vandenBelt, M .
NATURE, 1997, 387 (6630) :253-260
[7]   Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use conflicts in planning for sustainable, multi-functional landscapes [J].
de Groot, R .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2006, 75 (3-4) :175-186
[8]   A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services [J].
de Groot, RS ;
Wilson, MA ;
Boumans, RMJ .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2002, 41 (03) :393-408
[9]  
Defra (Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs), 2005, HIGH LEV SCHEM HDB
[10]   PLANT INJURY AND ADAPTATION TO OXYGEN DEFICIENCY IN THE ROOT ENVIRONMENT - A REVIEW [J].
DREW, MC .
PLANT AND SOIL, 1983, 75 (02) :179-199