Unifying structural priming effects on syntactic choices and timing of sentence generation

被引:49
作者
Segaert, Katrien [1 ,2 ]
Wheeldon, Linda [1 ]
Hagoort, Peter [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Sch Psychol, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
[2] Max Planck Inst Psycholinguist, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Ctr Cognit Neuroimaging, Donders Inst Brain Cognit & Behav, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
Structural priming; Syntactic choice; Production latency; Cumulativity; Verb repetition; Structure preference; LANGUAGE PRODUCTION; RECENT EXPERIENCE; PHRASE STRUCTURE; WORD-ORDER; MODEL; SCOPE; PERSISTENCE; FORMULATION; ACTIVATION; WRITTEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.jml.2016.03.011
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
We investigated whether structural priming of production latencies is sensitive to the same factors known to influence persistence of structural choices: structure preference, cumulativity and verb repetition. In two experiments, we found structural persistence only for passives (inverse preference effect) while priming effects on latencies were stronger for the actives (positive preference effect). We found structural persistence for passives to be influenced by immediate primes and long lasting cumulativity (all preceding primes) (Experiment 1), and to be boosted by verb repetition (Experiment 2). In latencies we found effects for actives were sensitive to long lasting cumulativity (Experiment 1). In Experiment 2, in latencies we found priming for actives overall, while for passives the priming effects emerged as the cumulative exposure increased but only when also aided by verb repetition. These findings are consistent with the Two-stage Competition model, an integrated model of structural priming effects for sentence choice and latency. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 80
页数:22
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]   Planning scope in spoken sentence production: The role of grammatical units [J].
Allum, Paul H. ;
Wheeldon, Linda R. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2007, 33 (04) :791-810
[2]   Scope of Lexical Access in Spoken Sentence Production: Implications for the Conceptual-Syntactic Interface [J].
Allum, Paul H. ;
Wheeldon, L. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2009, 35 (05) :1240-1255
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Foundations of knowledge
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Lexical-functional Syntax
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS
[6]   Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal [J].
Barr, Dale J. ;
Levy, Roger ;
Scheepers, Christoph ;
Tily, Harry J. .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2013, 68 (03) :255-278
[7]  
BERG T, 1992, J PSYCHOLINGUIST RES, V21, P405
[8]   Does verb bias modulate syntactic priming? [J].
Bernolet, Sarah ;
Hartsuiker, Robert J. .
COGNITION, 2010, 114 (03) :455-461
[9]   Persistence of emphasis in language production: A cross-linguistic approach [J].
Bernolet, Sarah ;
Hartsuiker, Robert J. ;
Pickering, Martin J. .
COGNITION, 2009, 112 (02) :300-317
[10]  
Bock J. K., 1994, Language production: Grammatical encoding in Handbook of Psycholinguistics, P945