Assessment of bone quality at the lumbar and sacral spine using CT scans: a retrospective feasibility study in 50 comparing CT and DXA data

被引:32
作者
Berger-Groch, J. [1 ]
Thiesen, D. M. [1 ]
Ntalos, D. [1 ]
Hennes, F. [1 ]
Hartel, M. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Trauma & Orthopaed Surg, Martinistr 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
关键词
Osteoporosis; Hounsfield units; Bone density; CT scan; DXA; MINERAL DENSITY; FRAGILITY FRACTURES; OSTEOPOROSIS; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1007/s00586-020-06292-z
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose Computed tomography (CT) is a standard diagnostic tool for preoperative screening for many indications in spinal and pelvic surgery. The gold standard for diagnosing osteoporosis is standard dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The aim of the present study was to compare the accuracy of Hounsfield unit (HU) measurements not only at the lower lumbar, but also at the sacral spine using standard CT scans. Patients and methods Main inclusion criterion for this retrospective analysis in 50 patients was the availability of both a CT scan of the lumbar and sacral spines and a DXA scan. HUs were measured in intact vertebral bodies L4, L5 and S1. Results of the HU in CT scan were compared to the T-score and bone mineral density in DXA. A group with normal bone density (T-score higher - 1, n = 26) was compared with a group with impaired bone density (T-score lower - 1, n = 24). Results A multivariant binary logistic regression analysis showed significant results for HU measurement in L4 (p = 0.009), L5 (p = 0.005) and S1 (p = 0.046) with respect to differentiation between normal and impaired bone quality. Cutoffs between normal and impaired bone density values for trabecular region of interest attenuation for L4, L5 and S1 are presented. In L4 100% sensitivity to detect normal bone was reached when HU was higher than 161, HU higher than 157 in L5 and HU higher than 207 in S1. Conclusions HU measurements in CT scans have proven to be a feasible tool to additionally assess bone quality at the lumbar and sacral spine with good sensitivity, when compared with the gold standard DXA. Graphic abstract These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
引用
收藏
页码:1098 / 1104
页数:7
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [31] Accuracy of DXA scanning of the thoracic spine: cadaveric studies comparing BMC, areal BMD and geometric estimates of volumetric BMD against ash weight and CT measures of bone volume
    Meena M. Sran
    Karim M. Khan
    Kathy Keiver
    Jason B. Chew
    Heather A. McKay
    Thomas R. Oxland
    European Spine Journal, 2005, 14 : 971 - 976
  • [32] Accuracy of DXA scanning of the thoracic spine: cadaveric studies comparing BMC, areal BMD and geometric estimates of volumetric BMD against ash weight and CT measures of bone volume
    Sran, MM
    Khan, KM
    Keiver, K
    Chew, JB
    McKay, HA
    Oxland, TR
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2005, 14 (10) : 971 - 976
  • [33] Detecting whether L1 or other lumbar levels would be excluded from DXA bone mineral density analysis during opportunistic CT screening for osteoporosis using machine learning
    Sebro, Ronnie
    de la Garza-ramos, Cynthia
    Peterson, Jeffrey J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOLOGY AND SURGERY, 2023, 18 (12) : 2261 - 2272
  • [34] Detecting whether L1 or other lumbar levels would be excluded from DXA bone mineral density analysis during opportunistic CT screening for osteoporosis using machine learning
    Ronnie Sebro
    Cynthia De la Garza-Ramos
    Jeffrey J. Peterson
    International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 2023, 18 : 2261 - 2272
  • [35] Is multidetector CT-based bone mineral density and quantitative bone microstructure assessment at the spine still feasible using ultra-low tube current and sparse sampling?
    Mei, Kai
    Kopp, Felix K.
    Bippus, Rolf
    Koehler, Thomas
    Schwaiger, Benedikt J.
    Gersing, Alexandra S.
    Fehringer, Andreas
    Sauter, Andreas
    Munzel, Daniela
    Pfeiffer, Franz
    Rummeny, Ernst J.
    Kirschke, Jan S.
    Noel, Peter B.
    Baum, Thomas
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2017, 27 (12) : 5261 - 5271
  • [36] Is multidetector CT-based bone mineral density and quantitative bone microstructure assessment at the spine still feasible using ultra-low tube current and sparse sampling?
    Kai Mei
    Felix K. Kopp
    Rolf Bippus
    Thomas Köhler
    Benedikt J. Schwaiger
    Alexandra S. Gersing
    Andreas Fehringer
    Andreas Sauter
    Daniela Münzel
    Franz Pfeiffer
    Ernst J. Rummeny
    Jan S. Kirschke
    Peter B. Noël
    Thomas Baum
    European Radiology, 2017, 27 : 5261 - 5271
  • [37] Accuracy and precision of volumetric bone mineral density assessment using dual-source dual-energy versus quantitative CT: a phantom study
    Vitali Koch
    Nils Große Hokamp
    Moritz H. Albrecht
    Leon D. Gruenewald
    Ibrahim Yel
    Jan Borggrefe
    Stefan Wesarg
    Katrin Eichler
    Iris Burck
    Tatjana Gruber-Rouh
    Lukas Lenga
    Thomas J. Vogl
    Simon S. Martin
    Julian L. Wichmann
    Renate M. Hammerstingl
    Leona S. Alizadeh
    Christoph Mader
    Nicole A. Huizinga
    Tommaso D’Angelo
    Giorgio Ascenti
    Silvio Mazziotti
    Christian Booz
    European Radiology Experimental, 5
  • [38] Diagnostic efficacy of Hounsfield units in spine CT for the assessment of real bone mineral density of degenerative spine: correlation study between T-scores determined by DEXA scan and Hounsfield units from CT
    Man Kyu Choi
    Sung Min Kim
    Jae Kwan Lim
    Acta Neurochirurgica, 2016, 158 : 1421 - 1427
  • [39] What is the role of CT-based Hounsfield unit assessment in the evaluation of bone mineral density in patients undergoing 1-or 2-level lumbar spinal fusion for degenerative spinal pathologies? A prospective study
    Viswanathan, Vibhu K.
    Shetty, Ajoy P.
    Rai, Nimish
    Sindhiya, Nancy
    Subramanian, Surabhi
    Rajasekaran, Shanmuganathan
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2023, 23 (10) : 1427 - 1434
  • [40] Evaluation of bone mineral density of the lumbar spine using a novel phantomless dual-energy CT post-processing algorithm in comparison with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
    Booz C.
    Hofmann P.C.
    Sedlmair M.
    Flohr T.G.
    Schmidt B.
    D’Angelo T.
    Martin S.S.
    Lenga L.
    Leithner D.
    Vogl T.J.
    Wichmann J.L.
    European Radiology Experimental, 1 (1)