The CHOICE study: Effect of counselling on the selection of combined hormonal contraceptive methods in 11 countries

被引:52
作者
Bitzer, Johannes [1 ]
Gemzell-Danielsson, Kristina [2 ,3 ]
Roumen, Frans [4 ]
Marintcheva-Petrova, Maya [5 ]
van Bakel, Bas [6 ]
Oddens, Bjorn J. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Spital Basel, Frauenklin, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland
[2] Karolinska Inst, Div Obstet & Gynaecol, Dept Womens & Childrens Hlth, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Stockholm, Sweden
[4] Atrium Med Ctr Parkstad, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Heerlen, Netherlands
[5] MSD, Oss, Netherlands
[6] OCS Consulting, NL-5222 AT Shertogenbosch, Netherlands
关键词
Combined hormonal contraception; Combined oral contraceptive; Transdermal contraceptive patch; Vaginal contraceptive ring; Counselling; VAGINAL RING; PROGRAM; IMPACT;
D O I
10.3109/13625187.2011.637586
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives To encourage healthcare professionals to counsel women seeking combined hormonal contraceptives (CHCs) about alternative CHCs and to study the infl uence of counselling on women's selection of CHCs. Methods Women (15-40 years old) in 11 countries who consulted HCPs about CHCs were counselled about the pill, transdermal patch, and vaginal ring. Both the HCPs and the women completed questionnaires. Results Of women who were counselled (n = 18,787), 47% selected another CHC method than originally planned. One in four who intended to use the pill chose another method (16% chose the patch; 65% chose the ring). In total, patch use increased from 5% to 8% (difference = 3.7% [97.5% CI: 3.3-4.2]; p < 0.0001). Ring use nearly quadrupled from 8% to 30% (difference = 21.7% [97.5% CI: 21.0-22.5]; p < 0.0001). Nearly all women who were undecided prior to counselling selected a method after counselling. Selection of the pill increased most in Russia (+11%) and Sweden (+5%); patch selection was greatest in Russia (+ 7%) and Israel (+ 6%); ring use increased most in Ukraine and in the Czech Republic and Slovakia (+ 36%). Conclusions Counselling increases use of alternative CHCs, such as the patch and the ring. Considerable differences between countries were noted.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 78
页数:14
相关论文
共 22 条
[11]   Factors associated with willingness to use the contraceptive vaginal ring [J].
Gilliam, Melissa ;
Holmquist, Sabriina ;
Berlin, Amy .
CONTRACEPTION, 2007, 76 (01) :30-34
[12]   Attitudes, Awareness, Compliance and Preferences among Hormonal Contraception Users A Global, Cross-Sectional, Self-Administered, Online Survey [J].
Hooper, David J. .
CLINICAL DRUG INVESTIGATION, 2010, 30 (11) :749-763
[13]   Factors affecting continuation rates of DMPA [J].
Hubacher, D ;
Goco, N ;
Gonzalez, B ;
Taylor, D .
CONTRACEPTION, 1999, 60 (06) :345-351
[14]   Factors affecting women's selection of a combined hormonal contraceptive method:: the TEAM-06 Spanish cross-sectional study [J].
Lete, Inaki ;
Doval, Jose Luis ;
Perez-Campos, Ezequiel ;
Sanchez-Borrego, Rafael ;
Correa, Marta ;
de la Viuda, Esther ;
Gomez, Mari Angeles ;
Gonzalez, Jose Vicente ;
Lertxundi, Roberto ;
Martinez, Maria Teresa ;
Mendoza, Nicolas ;
Robledo, Javier .
CONTRACEPTION, 2007, 76 (02) :77-83
[15]   A SAS(R) macro for constructing simultaneous confidence intervals for multinomial proportions [J].
May, WL ;
Johnson, WD .
COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 1997, 53 (03) :153-162
[16]   Does structured counselling influence combined hormonal contraceptive choice? [J].
Merckx, Mireille ;
Donders, Gilbert G. ;
Grandjean, Pascale ;
de Sande, Tine Van ;
Weyers, Steven .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CONTRACEPTION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE, 2011, 16 (06) :418-429
[17]  
Merki-Feld GS, 2012, EUR J CONTR IN PRESS, V17
[18]  
Rengel M, 2000, ENCY BIRTH CONTROL, P126
[19]   Unintended Pregnancy: Worldwide Levels, Trends, and Outcomes [J].
Singh, Susheela ;
Sedgh, Gilda ;
Hussain, Rubina .
STUDIES IN FAMILY PLANNING, 2010, 41 (04) :241-250
[20]   Contraceptive use and behavior in the 21st century: a comprehensive study across five European countries [J].
Skouby, SO .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CONTRACEPTION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE, 2004, 9 (02) :57-68