Using Wearable Inertial Sensors to Estimate Kinematic Parameters and Variability in the Table Tennis Topspin Forehand Stroke

被引:17
作者
Bankosz, Ziemowit [1 ]
Winiarski, Slawomir [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sch Phys Educ Wroclaw, Fac Sports, Dept Sports Didact, Wroclaw, Poland
[2] Univ Sch Phys Educ Wroclaw, Fac Phys Educ, Div Biomech, Wroclaw, Poland
关键词
MOVEMENT VARIABILITY; PERFORMANCE-LEVEL; RACKET; EXPERTISE; KINETICS; PLAYERS; LIMB;
D O I
10.1155/2020/8413948
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The study examined kinematic parameters and their inter- and intrasubject variability in the topspin forehand of seven top-level table tennis players. A wireless inertial measurement unit (IMU) system measured the movement of the playing hand to analyze the Ready position, Backswing, and Forward events, and a racket-mounted piezoelectric sensor captured the racket-ball Contact. In a four-phase cycle (Backswing, Hitting, Followthrough, and Back to Ready position), body sensors recorded the cycle and phase duration; angles in the sagittal plane at the shoulder, elbow, and wrist of the playing hand and at the knee joints; and acceleration of the playing hand at the moment of racket-ball contact. The coefficient of variation (CV) was calculated to determine the variability of kinematic parameters within and between players. The observed variability in stroke time duration was low (CV<20%) indicating constancy. The small-to-medium intraindividual variability of angles (CV<40%) indicates that each player used a broadly repeatable technique. The large intraindividual variability in movement was probably functional (i.e., motor adjustment and injury avoidance). Interindividual and intraindividual variability of knee and elbow angles was low; wrist extension was the most variable parameter (CV>40%) for all tasks, and shoulder joint variability was medium-to-large. Variability in hand acceleration was low (CV<20%). Individual players achieved relatively constant hand acceleration at the moment of contact, possibly because angular changes at one joint (e.g., shoulder) could be compensated for by changes at another (e.g., wrist). These findings can help to guide the teaching-learning process and to individualize the training process.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [21] Ivanek V., 2018, Facta Universitatis, Series: Physical Education and Sport, V16, P157, DOI DOI 10.22190/FUPES180507014I
  • [22] Kondric M, 2013, J SPORT SCI MED, V12, P362
  • [23] Movement variability of professional pool billiards players on selected tasks
    Kornfeind, Philipp
    Baca, Arnold
    Boindl, Thomas
    Kettlgruber, Andreas
    Gollnhuber, Gerald
    [J]. IMPACT OF TECHNOLOGY ON SPORT VI' 7TH ASIA-PACIFIC CONGRESS ON SPORTS TECHNOLOGY, APCST2015, 2015, 112 : 540 - 545
  • [24] A kinematic comparison between long-line and cross-court top spin forehand in competitive table tennis players
    Lanzoni, Ivan Malagoli
    Bartolomei, Sandro
    Di Michele, Rocco
    Fantozzi, Silvia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES, 2018, 36 (23) : 2637 - 2643
  • [25] Lee K. T., 2004, P 12 C INT SOC BIOM, P330
  • [26] Legg J, 2017, SPORTS, V5, DOI 10.3390/sports5040085
  • [27] Malagoli L. I., 2010, INT J TABLE TENNIS S, V6
  • [28] Coordination-variability and kinematics of misses versus swishes of basketball free throws
    Mullineaux, David R.
    Uhl, Timothy L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES, 2010, 28 (09) : 1017 - 1024
  • [29] Padulo J, 2016, J SPORT MED PHYS FIT, V56, P149
  • [30] Effects of performance level on lower limb kinematics during table tennis forehand loop
    Qian, Jieyuan
    Zhang, Yan
    Baker, Julien S.
    Gu, Yaodong
    [J]. ACTA OF BIOENGINEERING AND BIOMECHANICS, 2016, 18 (03) : 149 - 155