Using Wearable Inertial Sensors to Estimate Kinematic Parameters and Variability in the Table Tennis Topspin Forehand Stroke

被引:17
作者
Bankosz, Ziemowit [1 ]
Winiarski, Slawomir [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sch Phys Educ Wroclaw, Fac Sports, Dept Sports Didact, Wroclaw, Poland
[2] Univ Sch Phys Educ Wroclaw, Fac Phys Educ, Div Biomech, Wroclaw, Poland
关键词
MOVEMENT VARIABILITY; PERFORMANCE-LEVEL; RACKET; EXPERTISE; KINETICS; PLAYERS; LIMB;
D O I
10.1155/2020/8413948
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The study examined kinematic parameters and their inter- and intrasubject variability in the topspin forehand of seven top-level table tennis players. A wireless inertial measurement unit (IMU) system measured the movement of the playing hand to analyze the Ready position, Backswing, and Forward events, and a racket-mounted piezoelectric sensor captured the racket-ball Contact. In a four-phase cycle (Backswing, Hitting, Followthrough, and Back to Ready position), body sensors recorded the cycle and phase duration; angles in the sagittal plane at the shoulder, elbow, and wrist of the playing hand and at the knee joints; and acceleration of the playing hand at the moment of racket-ball contact. The coefficient of variation (CV) was calculated to determine the variability of kinematic parameters within and between players. The observed variability in stroke time duration was low (CV<20%) indicating constancy. The small-to-medium intraindividual variability of angles (CV<40%) indicates that each player used a broadly repeatable technique. The large intraindividual variability in movement was probably functional (i.e., motor adjustment and injury avoidance). Interindividual and intraindividual variability of knee and elbow angles was low; wrist extension was the most variable parameter (CV>40%) for all tasks, and shoulder joint variability was medium-to-large. Variability in hand acceleration was low (CV<20%). Individual players achieved relatively constant hand acceleration at the moment of contact, possibly because angular changes at one joint (e.g., shoulder) could be compensated for by changes at another (e.g., wrist). These findings can help to guide the teaching-learning process and to individualize the training process.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Balasubramanian S., 2013, THESIS
  • [2] Bankosz Z, 2020, J SPORT SCI MED, V19, P138
  • [3] The Evaluation of Changes of Angles in Selected Joints During Topspin Forehand in Table Tennis
    Bankosz, Ziemowit
    Winiarski, Slawomir
    [J]. MOTOR CONTROL, 2018, 22 (03) : 314 - 337
  • [4] Bankosz Z, 2018, J SPORT SCI MED, V17, P330
  • [5] The kinematics of table tennis racquet: differences between topspin strokes
    Bankosz, Ziemowit
    Winiarski, Slawomir
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE AND PHYSICAL FITNESS, 2017, 57 (03) : 202 - 213
  • [6] Is movement variability important for sports biomechanists?
    Bartletti, Roger
    Wheat, Jon
    Robins, Matthew
    [J]. SPORTS BIOMECHANICS, 2007, 6 (02) : 224 - 243
  • [7] TIMING AN ATTACKING FOREHAND DRIVE IN TABLE TENNIS
    BOOTSMA, RJ
    VANWIERINGEN, PCW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1990, 16 (01) : 21 - 29
  • [8] Busquets A, 2016, J SPORT SCI MED, V15, P268
  • [9] Examining movement variability in the basketball free-throw action at different skill levels
    Button, C
    MacLeod, M
    Sanders, R
    Coleman, S
    [J]. RESEARCH QUARTERLY FOR EXERCISE AND SPORT, 2003, 74 (03) : 257 - 269
  • [10] Intra-individual movement variability during skill transitions: A useful marker?
    Carson, Howie J.
    Collins, Dave
    Richards, Jim
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SPORT SCIENCE, 2014, 14 (04) : 327 - 336