Statistical power in two-level hierarchical linear models with arbitrary number of factor levels

被引:1
作者
Shin, Yongyun [1 ]
Lafata, Jennifer Elston [2 ]
Cao, Yu [3 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Dept Biostat, POB 980032,830 East Main St, Richmond, VA 23298 USA
[2] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[3] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Richmond, VA 23298 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Cluster randomized trial; Multisite randomized trial; Split-plot randomized trial; Interaction effects; Omnibus test; Sample sizes; SAMPLE-SIZE DETERMINATION; OPTIMAL-DESIGN; CANCER; EDUCATION; PATIENT; INTERVENTION; FRAMEWORK; PARTNERS; QUALITY; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.jspi.2017.09.004
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
As the US health care system undergoes unprecedented changes, the need for adequately powered studies to understand the multiple levels of main and interaction factors that influence patient and other care outcomes in hierarchical settings has taken center stage. We consider two-level models where n lower-level units are nested within each of J higher-level clusters (e.g. patients within practices and practices within networks) and where two factors may have arbitrary a and b factor levels, respectively. Both factors may represent a x b treatment combinations, or one of them may be a pretreatment covariate. Consideration of both factors at the same higher or lower hierarchical level, or one factor per hierarchical level yields a cluster (C), multisite (M) or split-plot randomized design (S). We express statistical power to detect main, interaction, or any treatment effects as a function of sample sizes (n,J), a and b factor levels, intraclass correlation rho and effect sizes given each design d is an element of {C, M, S}. The power function given a, b, rho, delta and d determines adequate sample sizes to achieve a minimum power requirement. Next, we compare the impact of the designs on power to facilitate selection of optimal design and sample sizes in a way that minimizes the total cost given budget and logistic constraints. Our approach enables accurate and conservative power computation with a priori knowledge of only three effect size differences regardless of how large a x b is, simplifying previously available computation methods for health services and other researches. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:106 / 121
页数:16
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Angrist JD, 1996, J AM STAT ASSOC, V91, P444, DOI 10.2307/2291629
  • [2] [Anonymous], MED CARE RES REV
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
  • [4] [Anonymous], BEHAVIORMETRIKA
  • [5] [Anonymous], TECHNICAL REPORT
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2001, Generalizability Theory
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2002, HIERARCHICAL LINEAR
  • [8] Breast cancer: Education, counseling, and adjustment among patients and partners: A randomized clinical trial
    Budin, Wendy C.
    Hoskins, Carol Noll
    Haber, Judith
    Sherman, Deborah Witt
    Maislin, Greg
    Cater, Jacqueline R.
    Cartwright-Alcarese, Frances
    Kowalski, Mildred Ortu
    McSherry, Christina Beyer
    Fuerbach, Renee
    Shukla, Shilpa
    [J]. NURSING RESEARCH, 2008, 57 (03) : 199 - 213
  • [9] Facilitating research participation and improving quality of life for African American prostate cancer survivors and their intimate partners - A pilot study of telephone-based coping skills training
    Campbell, Lisa C.
    Keefe, Francis J.
    Scipio, Cindy
    McKee, Daphne C.
    Edwards, Christopher L.
    Herman, Steven H.
    Johnson, Lawrence E.
    Colvin, O. Michael
    McBride, Colleen M.
    Donatucci, Craig
    [J]. CANCER, 2007, 109 (02) : 414 - 424
  • [10] Casella G., 2008, STAT DESIGN