Aortic prosthetic graft infections: Radiologic manifestations and implications for management

被引:145
作者
Orton, DF
LeVeen, RF
Saigh, JA
Culp, WC
Fidler, JL
Lynch, TJ
Goertzen, TC
McCowan, TC
机构
[1] Vet Adm Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Omaha, NE 68105 USA
[2] Vet Adm Med Ctr, Serv Radiol, Gainesville, FL 32602 USA
[3] Univ Nebraska, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Omaha, NE 68105 USA
[4] Univ Nebraska, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Omaha, NE 68105 USA
关键词
aorta; grafts and prostheses; surgery; grafts; infection;
D O I
10.1148/radiographics.20.4.g00jl12977
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Prosthetic graft infections are an uncommon complication of aortic bypass. These infections may have serious sequelae such as limb loss and can be lethal. They are hard to eradicate and, under certain circumstances, difficult to diagnose. Usually, computed tomography (CT) is the most efficacious imaging method for diagnosis of graft infections due to its quick availability. The sensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging in detection of perigraft infection has not been thoroughly investigated but is probably similar to that of CT. After the early postoperative period, persistent or expanding perigraft soft tissue, fluid, and gas are the CT findings of graft infection. Aortoenteric fistula should be considered a subset of aortic graft infection; however, perigraft air is more likely to be seen with an aortoenteric fistula. Other conditions associated with graft infection include pseudoaneurysm, hydronephrosis, and osteomyelitis. Adjunctive studies such as sinography, ultrasonography, gallium scanning, and labeled white blood cell scanning can be quite useful in diagnosis, determination of the extent of disease, and selection of the treatment modality. White blood cell scanning is an important complementary test to CT in ambiguous cases, such as in the early postoperative period, and may be more sensitive in detection of early graft infection.
引用
收藏
页码:977 / 993
页数:17
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] ALDALAAN A, 1995, J RHEUMATOL, V22, P2008
  • [2] INCORPORATION VERSUS INFECTION OF RETROPERITONEAL AORTIC GRAFTS - MR IMAGING FEATURES
    AUFFERMANN, W
    OLOFSSON, PA
    RABAHIE, GN
    TAVARES, NJ
    STONEY, RJ
    HIGGINS, CB
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1989, 172 (02) : 359 - 362
  • [3] Aortic graft infection:: The value of percutaneous drainage
    Bélair, M
    Soulez, G
    Oliva, VL
    Lapérrière, J
    Gianfelice, D
    Blair, JF
    Sarrazin, J
    Thèrasse, E
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1998, 171 (01) : 119 - 124
  • [4] CALLIGARO KD, 1991, SURGERY, V110, P805
  • [5] Davis JM., 1991, Principles in management of surgical infections, P372
  • [6] DENNIS JW, 1986, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V121, P314
  • [7] Redo aortic grafting after treatment of aortic graft infection
    DiMuzio, PJ
    Reilly, LM
    Stoney, RJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1996, 24 (03) : 328 - 335
  • [8] DETECTION OF AORTIC GRAFT INFECTION WITH LEUKOCYTES LABELED WITH TECHNETIUM 99M HEXAMETAZIME
    FIORANI, P
    SPEZIALE, F
    RIZZO, L
    DESANTIS, F
    MASSIMI, GJ
    TAURINO, M
    FARAGLIA, V
    FIORANI, L
    BAIOCCHI, P
    SANTINI, C
    CLEMENTE, M
    LIBERATORE, M
    LAWRENCE, PF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1993, 17 (01) : 87 - 96
  • [9] STIR IMAGING OF SYNTHETIC VASCULAR GRAFT INFECTION
    HANSEN, ME
    YUCEL, EK
    WALTMAN, AC
    [J]. CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 1993, 16 (01) : 30 - 36
  • [10] HARRIS KA, 1989, J CARDIOVASC SURG, V30, P230