Screening for Beta-Lactam Allergy in Joint Arthroplasty Patients to Improve Surgical Prophylaxis Practice

被引:59
|
作者
McDanel, Deanna L. [1 ,2 ]
Azar, Antoine E. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Dowden, Amy M. [3 ,4 ]
Murray-Bainer, Samantha [3 ,6 ]
Noiseux, Nicolas O. [7 ]
Willenborg, Melissa [7 ]
Clark, Charles R. [7 ]
Callaghan, John J. [7 ]
Haleem, Ambar [3 ,8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iowa Healthcare, Dept Pharmaceut Care, Iowa City, IA USA
[2] Univ Iowa, Coll Pharm, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[3] Univ Iowa, Carver Coll Med, Iowa City, IA USA
[4] Univ Iowa Healthcare, Iowa City, IA USA
[5] Johns Hopkins Univ, Baltimore, MD USA
[6] Univ Wisconsin Hosp & Clin, Madison, WI 53792 USA
[7] Univ Iowa, Dept Orthopaed & Rehabil, Iowa City, IA USA
[8] Univ Iowa, Dept Internal Med, Div Infect Dis, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[9] Univ Wisconsin, Div Infect Dis, Madison, WI USA
关键词
allergy; beta-lactam; cefazolin; prophylaxis; screening; surgery; PENICILLIN ALLERGY; CEPHALOSPORIN ANTIBIOTICS; BUNDLED PAYMENTS; VANCOMYCIN USE; HISTORY; REDUCTION; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2017.01.012
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The reliability of patient-reported penicillin allergies has been disputed. A Drug Allergy Clinic (DAC) was established at our institution in combination with an electronic best practice alert (BPA) in the Orthopedic Clinic. Joint arthroplasty patients with a reported history of beta-lactam allergy (HOBA) were preoperatively referred via the BPA to the DAC. The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of beta-lactam allergy screening in enabling the surgical team to optimize antimicrobial prophylaxis. Methods: Between February 2013 and May 2015, 161 patients with a HOBA were referred to the DAC where they underwent penicillin skin testing (PST), a drug challenge to a beta-lactam antibiotic, and/or had no intervention depending on the history obtained. Results: PST was performed on 140 of 161 (87%) patients. A negative PST was noted in 139 (99%) patients, indicating no penicillin allergy. Cefazolin was safe to use in 145 (90%) patients evaluated. Significantly more patients evaluated in the DAC vs those not seen got cefazolin in any surgical prophylaxis regimen (90% vs 77%) without any adverse perioperative reactions. Concurrently, the use of non-beta-lactam antibiotics was significantly less in the patients evaluated vs not evaluated (16% vs 27%). The overall use of cefazolin in orthopedic surgeries in patients with HOBA was >84% over the course of the study period. Conclusion: Beta-lactam allergy screening using a BPA and a DAC promotes the use of standard surgical prophylaxis with cefazolin. Joint arthroplasty surgeons should consider implementing allergy screening programs to promote antimicrobial stewardship. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:S101 / S108
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Self-reported beta-lactam allergy and the risk of surgical site infection: A retrospective cohort study
    Lam, Philip W.
    Tarighi, Payam
    Elligsen, Marion
    Gunaratne, Keith
    Nathens, Avery B.
    Tarshis, Jordan
    Leis, Jerome A.
    INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2020, 41 (04) : 438 - 443
  • [22] Beta-lactam allergy in the paediatric population
    Wong, Tiffany
    Atkinson, Adelle
    t'Jong, Geert
    Rieder, Michael J.
    Chan, Edmond S.
    Abrams, Elissa M.
    PAEDIATRICS & CHILD HEALTH, 2020, 25 (01) : 62 - 62
  • [23] Update on beta-lactam allergy diagnosis
    Pascal Demoly
    Antonino Romano
    Current Allergy and Asthma Reports, 2005, 5 : 9 - 14
  • [24] Optimizing utilization of beta-lactam surgical prophylaxis through implementation of a structured allergy assessment tool in a presurgical clinic
    Margallo, John-Ericson P.
    Smith, Ethan A.
    Marks, Gregory
    Ben-Aderet, Michael
    Yang, Haoshu
    Madhusudhan, Meghan
    Krishna, Sneha
    Duran, Ann
    Friedman, Arnold
    Cassel, Suzanne L.
    Hai Tran
    Shane, Rita
    Murthy, Rekha K.
    Grein, Jonathan D.
    INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2019, 40 (12) : 1420 - 1422
  • [25] Risk stratification in beta-lactam allergy
    Arikoglu, Tugba
    Kont, Aylin Ozhan
    Demirhan, Ali
    Yuksek, Burcu Caglar
    Tokmeci, Nazan
    Kuyucu, Semanur
    CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN ALLERGY, 2021, 8 (04) : 285 - 297
  • [26] Suspected allergy to Beta-Lactam antibiotics: An infectiological perspective
    Sunderkoetter, C.
    ALLERGOLOGIE, 2022, 45 (02) : 102 - 108
  • [27] Impact of Beta-lactam Allergy on Treatment of Outpatient Infections
    Mason, Jessica
    Kiel, Alyssa
    White, Alexis
    Clark, Collin M.
    Wattengel, Bethany A.
    Sellick, John A.
    Mergenhagen, Kari A.
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2019, 41 (12) : 2529 - 2539
  • [28] The impact of beta-lactam allergy labels on hospitalized children
    Jones, Trahern W.
    Fino, Nora
    Olson, Jared
    Hersh, Adam L.
    INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2021, 42 (03) : 318 - 324
  • [29] Is the Anamnesis Enough to De-Label Patients with Reported Beta-Lactam Allergy?
    Rozlucka, Lesia
    Rymarczyk, Barbara
    Gawlik, Radoslaw
    Gluck, Joanna
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (23)
  • [30] Update for Antibiotic Allergy: Cross-Reactions in Patients with Beta-Lactam Allergy
    Wurpts, G.
    ALLERGOLOGIE, 2017, 40 (11) : 483 - 490