Screening for small for gestational age using third-trimester ultrasound markers: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of screening test accuracy

被引:2
|
作者
Gasse, Cedric [1 ,2 ]
Paquette, Kim [1 ]
Demers, Suzanne [1 ,3 ]
Roberge, Stephanie [4 ]
Bujold, Emmanuel [1 ,3 ]
Boutin, Amelie [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Laval, Reprod Mother & Child Hlth Unit, CHU Quebec, Res Ctr, 2705 Boul Laurier, Quebec City, PQ G1V 4G2, Canada
[2] Univ Laval, Dept Social & Prevent Med, Fac Med, 1050 Ave Med, Quebec City, PQ G1V 0A6, Canada
[3] Univ Laval, Dept Gynecol Obstet & Reprod, Fac Med, 1050 Ave Med, Quebec City, PQ G1V 0A6, Canada
[4] Kings Coll Hosp London, Harris Birthright Res Ctr Fetal Med, Fetal Med Res Inst, London, England
[5] Univ British Columbia, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Fac Med, 4500 Oak St, Vancouver, BC V6H 3N1, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Ultrasound; Small for gestational age; Screening; Screening accuracy; Third trimester; INTRAUTERINE GROWTH RESTRICTION; UTERINE ARTERY DOPPLER; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1186/s13643-018-0885-4
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundFetal growth restriction (FGR) is a complication of pregnancy associated with major neonatal morbidity and commonly diagnosed at birth based on birth weight below the 5th or the 10th centile. There is no consensus on the use of routine third-trimester ultrasound for the detection of FGR in a general population. This systematic review aims to estimate the performance of third-trimester ultrasound markers in the screening for babies who are small for gestational age in low-risk or general population.MethodsA systematic review of screening test accuracy will be conducted. The databases MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science will be searched from their inception until December 2017, as well as reference lists of included studies and previous related review articles. Studies screening for FGR in a low-risk or general population using third-trimester ultrasound markers and reporting low birth weight for gestational age (small for gestational age at birth) as a reference will be eligible. Two reviewers will independently screen references for inclusion, assess the risk of bias, and extract data. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Study 2 (QUADAS-2) tool will be used to assess the methodological quality and validity of individual studies. The hierarchal summary receiver operating characteristic and random effects hierarchal bivariate models (Bivariate) will be used to estimate the pooled sensitivity and specificity of each ultrasound marker and to compare the discriminative ability of the different ultrasound markers. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses will be performed to explore the heterogeneity between studies and to assess the effect of screening tests' characteristics (e.g., timing) on their discriminative ability.DiscussionThis systematic review will determine the relevance of routine third-trimester ultrasound markers in the screening for FGR in low-risk or general population and their usefulness in standard pregnancy care. Additionally, this knowledge synthesis represents a step in the optimization of the discriminative ability of third-trimester ultrasound and predictive tools, allowing for targeted interventions aiming at the reduction of FGR complications and ultimately improving infants' health.Systematic review registrationThis protocol has been registered at PROSPERO: international prospective register of systematic reviews. The register number is CRD42018085564.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Detecting the Small for Gestational Age Fetus at Term: Third-Trimester Ultrasound versus Clinical Evaluation
    Green, B.
    Brownfoot, F.
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2017, 57 : 45 - 45
  • [22] The Delirium Observation Screening Scale: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy
    Park, Jinkyung
    Jeong, Eunhye
    Lee, Juneyoung
    CLINICAL NURSING RESEARCH, 2021, 30 (04) : 464 - 473
  • [23] Diagnostic test accuracy of the Nursing Delirium Screening Scale: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jeong, Eunhye
    Park, Jinkyung
    Lee, Juneyoung
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2020, 76 (10) : 2510 - 2521
  • [24] Delirium screening tools A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liu, YuJuan
    Zhang, Qian
    Zhao, Yayun
    Gao, Zhuying
    Wei, Zhengyong
    Guo, Ziqi
    Chen, Meixi
    Zhang, Qing
    Yang, Xuemei
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (35)
  • [25] Diagnostic performance of third-trimester ultrasound for the prediction of late-onset fetal growth restriction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Caradeux, Javier
    Martinez-Portilla, Raigam J.
    Peguero, Anna
    Sotiriadis, Alexandros
    Figueras, Francesc
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 220 (05) : 449 - +
  • [26] How often do we identify fetal abnormalities during routine third-trimester ultrasound? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Drukker, L.
    Bradburn, E.
    Rodriguez, G. B.
    Roberts, N. W.
    Impey, L.
    Papageorghiou, A. T.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2021, 128 (02) : 259 - 269
  • [27] Effectiveness of third trimester ultrasound screening in the prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates: a retrospective cohort study
    Collee, J.
    Noel, L.
    Henry, L.
    Nisolle, M.
    Chantraine, F.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 62 : 173 - 174
  • [28] Usefulness of ultrasound fetal anthropometry in primary and secondary screening to identify small for gestational age: A meta-analysis
    Goto, Eita
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ULTRASOUND, 2019, 47 (04) : 212 - 218
  • [29] Screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes in India: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Katherine T.
    Naik, Shilpa
    Alexander, Mallika
    Mathad, Jyoti S.
    ACTA DIABETOLOGICA, 2018, 55 (06) : 613 - 625
  • [30] Screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes in India: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Katherine T. Li
    Shilpa Naik
    Mallika Alexander
    Jyoti S. Mathad
    Acta Diabetologica, 2018, 55 : 613 - 625