The patient perspective: perceptions of the quality of the abortion experience

被引:37
作者
Altshuler, Anna L. [1 ,2 ]
Whaley, Natalie S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Calif Pacific Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 475 Brannan St 220, San Francisco, CA 94107 USA
[2] Calif Pacific Med Ctr, Res Inst, 475 Brannan St 220, San Francisco, CA 94107 USA
[3] Univ Rochester, Sch Med, Dept Obstet Gynecol, Rochester, NY USA
关键词
abortion experience; abortion quality; patient preferences; patient-centered care; person-centered care; reproductive experience; WOMENS EXPERIENCES; POSTABORTION CARE; YOUNG-WOMEN; PROVIDERS; STIGMA; WANT; IF; EXPLORATION; AGENCY;
D O I
10.1097/GCO.0000000000000492
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Purpose of review Abortion services are essential in sexual and reproductive health and should be held to the same standards as other health services. Patient (or person)-centeredness is a key dimension of healthcare quality that incorporates the perspectives of patients in care provision. The purpose of this review is to summarize studies published in the last year examining women's experiences with abortion care and to describe facilitators and barriers to person-centered care. Recent findings Considering person-centeredness in abortion care using dimensions of dignity, autonomy, privacy, communication, social support, supportive care and health facility environment allows for critical evaluation of data describing women's experiences with abortion and postabortion services. Review of the available literature shed light on the impact of social stigma, health policy and abortion restrictions on women's abortion experiences. Considering multiple domains and varied settings, current data suggest abortion services worldwide generally fail to provide person-centered care. Institutions and providers may be limited in their ability to provide patient-centered abortion care because of deeply embedded social stigma, institutional regulations and legal restrictions.
引用
收藏
页码:407 / 413
页数:7
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Barriers to accessing abortion services and perspectives on using mifepristone and misoprostol at home in Great Britain
    Aiken, Abigail R. A.
    Guthrie, Katherine A.
    Schellekens, Marlies
    Trussell, James
    Gomperts, Rebecca
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2018, 97 (02) : 177 - 183
  • [2] Self reported outcomes and adverse events after medical abortion through online telemedicine: population based study in the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland
    Aiken, Abigail R. A.
    Digol, Irena
    Trussell, James
    Gomperts, Rebecca
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 357
  • [3] Aiken ARA, 2018, PERSPECT SEX REPROD, V50
  • [4] Women's and Healthcare Workers' Beliefs and Experiences Surrounding Abortion: The Case of Haiti
    Albuja, Laura Dean
    Cianelli, Rosina
    Anglade, Debbie
    Owusu, Brenda
    Joseph, Laly
    Sailsman, Sonique
    Ferrer, Lilian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING SCHOLARSHIP, 2017, 49 (02) : 170 - 176
  • [5] A good abortion experience: A qualitative exploration of women's needs and preferences in clinical care
    Altshuler, Anna L.
    Ojanen-Goldsmith, Alison
    Blumenthal, Paul D.
    Freedman, Lori R.
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2017, 191 : 109 - 116
  • [6] Male Partners' Involvement in Abortion Care: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review
    Altshuler, Anna L.
    Nguyen, Brian T.
    Riley, Halley E. M.
    Tinsley, Marilyn L.
    Tuncalp, Ozge
    [J]. PERSPECTIVES ON SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2016, 48 (04) : 209 - 219
  • [7] [Anonymous], REQ ULTR
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2018, SAFETY QUALITY ABORT
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2001, Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century, P39
  • [10] To be, or not to be, referred: A qualitative study of women from Burma's access to legal abortion care in Thailand
    Arnott, Grady
    Tho, Eh
    Guroong, Niru
    Foster, Angel M.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (06):