Age and interval for screening mammography: Whom do you believe?

被引:0
作者
Venta, LA [1 ]
Goodhartz, LA [1 ]
机构
[1] NORTHWESTERN UNIV,SCH MED,DEPT RADIOL,CHICAGO,IL 60611
来源
SEMINARS IN SURGICAL ONCOLOGY | 1996年 / 12卷 / 05期
关键词
breast neoplasms; epidemiology; age factors; mammography; public health; BREAST-CANCER DETECTION; DETECTION DEMONSTRATION PROJECT; DEATH RATES; UNITED-STATES; WOMEN; PATTERNS; TRIAL; MORTALITY; SURVIVAL; STAGE;
D O I
10.1002/(SICI)1098-2388(199609/10)12:5<281::AID-SSU2>3.0.CO;2-9
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The purpose of this article is to help the clinician understand the benefits and limitations of screening mammography in the 40-49 age group. Since the benefit of screening mammography is well established in the literature for the 50-59 age group, comparison of the relevant issues is focused on similarities and differences between these two age groups. The incidence of breast cancer, the effectiveness of mammography, and the growth rates of tumors influence the benefit derived from screening. Available data suggest that mammography is equally effective in both age groups, with similar detection rates of minimal cancer (27 vs. 25%). The difference in estimated annual incidence between the 40-49 and the 50-59 age group is only 8%. Since tumor growth rate seems to be faster in the younger age group, screening should be performed annually, starting at 40 years of age, if it is to provide a benefit. (C) 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:281 / 289
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mammography screening and trust: The case of interval breast cancer
    Solbjor, Marit
    Skolbekken, John-Arne
    Saetnan, Ann Rudinow
    Hagen, Anne Irene
    Forsmo, Siri
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2012, 75 (10) : 1746 - 1752
  • [2] Effect of age on breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography
    Rafferty, Elizabeth A.
    Rose, Stephen L.
    Miller, Dave P.
    Durand, Melissa A.
    Conant, Emily F.
    Copit, Debra S.
    Friedewald, Sarah M.
    Plecha, Donna M.
    Ott, Ingrid L.
    Hayes, Mary K.
    Carlson, Kara L.
    Cink, Thomas M.
    Barke, Lora D.
    Greer, Linda N.
    Niklason, Loren T.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2017, 164 (03) : 659 - 666
  • [3] Mammography Screening Should Begin at Age 40 Years
    Hendrick, R. Edward
    Monticciolo, Debra L.
    JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING, 2024, 6 (02) : 116 - 123
  • [4] Mammography interval and breast cancer mortality in women over the age of 75
    Simon, Michael S.
    Wassertheil-Smoller, Sylvia
    Thomson, Cynthia A.
    Ray, Roberta M.
    Hubbell, F. Allan
    Lessin, Lawrence
    Lane, Dorothy S.
    Kuller, Lew H.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2014, 148 (01) : 187 - 195
  • [5] At what age should screening mammography be recommended for Asian women?
    Tsuchida, Junko
    Nagahashi, Masayuki
    Rashid, Omar M.
    Takabe, Kazuaki
    Wakai, Toshifumi
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2015, 4 (07): : 1136 - 1144
  • [6] Interval cancer incidence and episode sensitivity in the Norrbotten Mammography Screening Programme, Sweden
    Bordas, Pal
    Jonsson, Hakan
    Nystrom, Lennarth
    Lenner, Per
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2009, 16 (01) : 39 - 45
  • [7] "Do Unto Others as You Would Have Them Do Unto You": Breast Imagers' Perspectives Regarding Screening Mammography for Others and for Themselves-Do They Practice What They Preach?
    Lee, Jiyon
    Gordon, Paula B.
    Whitman, Gary J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2015, 204 (06) : 1336 - 1344
  • [8] The PLATO trial: do you believe in magic?
    Serebruany, Victor L.
    Atar, Dan
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2010, 31 (07) : 764 - 767
  • [9] Mammography screening interval and the frequency of interval cancers in a population-based screening
    Klemi, PJ
    Toikkanen, S
    Rasanen, O
    Parvinen, I
    Joensuu, H
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1997, 75 (05) : 762 - 766
  • [10] Integrating Age and Comorbidity to Assess Screening Mammography Utilization
    Tan, Alai
    Kuo, Yong-Fang
    Goodwin, James S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2012, 42 (03) : 229 - 234