Earthquake risk analysis for Los Angeles County under present and planned land uses

被引:11
|
作者
Olshansky, RB [1 ]
Wu, YM [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Urban & Reg Planning, Champaign, IL 61820 USA
来源
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING B-PLANNING & DESIGN | 2001年 / 28卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1068/b2639
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Local governments rarely use risk analysis, the most sophisticated level of hazard assessment, to inform their planning and development decisions. But new tools are rapidly becoming available to accomplish such analysis. In this paper we present an example of an earthquake risk analysis for Los Angeles County, using available land-use maps, a probabilistic earthquake hazard model developed by the Southern California Earthquake Center, and the Federal Emergency Management Agency's new HAZUS earthquake loss estimation software. We computed the annual expected loss owing to earthquakes and the spatial variation of this risk. The analysis shows that the annual long-term earthquake risk in Los Angeles County, as a result of direct structural and nonstructural damage, is $388 million per year. We also investigated the extent to which planned future land-use growth would affect this risk estimate. We found that planned growth of 14.2% would result in an increase in annual risk to $449.5 million, a 15.8% increase over the risk to current land uses. Because of ever increasing disaster costs, planners need to be able to evaluate the risks that their communities face, both in the present and in the future. It is particularly important for planners to be sure that they are not disproportionately planning future growth for hazardous locations. In this paper we describe some ways in which to perform such evaluations, by using tools that have only recently become available.
引用
收藏
页码:419 / 432
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] SMOG CONTROL IN LOS-ANGELES COUNTY - CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF EMISSION CONTROL PROGRAMS
    BLAND, WR
    PROFESSIONAL GEOGRAPHER, 1976, 28 (03): : 283 - 289
  • [42] OCCUPATIONAL LEAD-EXPOSURE IN LOS-ANGELES COUNTY - AN OCCUPATIONAL RISK SURVEILLANCE STRATEGY
    PAPANEK, PJ
    WARD, CE
    GILBERT, KM
    FRANGOS, SA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL MEDICINE, 1992, 21 (02) : 199 - 208
  • [43] RISK-FACTORS FOR CARRIAGE OF MENINGOCOCCUS IN THE LOS-ANGELES-COUNTY MENS JAIL SYSTEM
    THOMAS, JC
    BENDANA, NS
    WATERMAN, SH
    RATHBUN, M
    ARAKERE, G
    FRASCH, CE
    WENGER, JD
    MAGSOMBOL, V
    CLARK, JH
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1991, 133 (03) : 286 - 295
  • [44] HEART-DISEASE RISK-FACTORS IN LOS-ANGELES COUNTY SAFETY PERSONNEL
    THOMAS, PC
    CADY, LD
    OCONNELL, ER
    BISCHOFF, DP
    KERSHNAR, RK
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 1979, 21 (10) : 683 - 687
  • [45] Alcohol and breast cancer risk among Asian-American women in Los Angeles County
    Wu, Anna H.
    Vigen, Cheryl
    Razavi, Pedram
    Tseng, Chiu-Chen
    Stancyzk, Frank Z.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2012, 14 (06):
  • [46] RISK-FACTORS FOR CARRIAGE OF MENINGOCOCCUS IN THE LOS-ANGELES COUNTY MENS JAIL SYSTEM
    THOMAS, JC
    BENDANA, N
    WATERMAN, S
    CLARK, J
    MAGSAMBO, V
    RATHBUN, M
    MCKINNEY, R
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1989, 130 (04) : 838 - 838
  • [47] Mortality in extreme heat events: an analysis of Los Angeles County Medical Examiner data
    Baker, L.
    Sturm, R.
    PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 236 : 290 - 296
  • [48] The Los Angeles County response to child abuse and deafness: A social movement theory analysis
    Embry, Richard A.
    Grossman, Frank D.
    AMERICAN ANNALS OF THE DEAF, 2007, 151 (05) : 488 - 498
  • [49] AGE IS ASSOCIATED WITH HIV SEXUAL RISK BEHAVIORS AMONG TRANS WOMEN IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY
    Kisler, Kimberly A.
    Fletcher, Jesse B.
    Fehrenbacher, Anne E.
    Reback, Cathy J.
    AIDS EDUCATION AND PREVENTION, 2021, 33 (06) : 483 - 494
  • [50] Risk patterns of multiple myeloma in Los Angeles County, 1972-1999 (United States)
    Gebregziabher, Mulugeta
    Bernstein, Leslie
    Wang, Yaping
    Cozen, Wendy
    CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2006, 17 (07) : 931 - 938