Low-Dose Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin Versus Basiliximab Induction Therapy in Low-Risk Renal Transplant Recipients: 8-Year Follow-Up

被引:27
|
作者
Laftavi, M. R. [1 ]
Alnimri, M. [1 ]
Weber-Shrikant, E. [2 ]
Kohli, R. [3 ]
Said, M. [1 ]
Patel, S. [1 ]
Pankewycz, O. [1 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Buffalo, Dept Surg, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA
[2] SUNY Buffalo, Dept Pathol, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA
[3] SUNY Buffalo, Dept Med, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA
关键词
KIDNEY-TRANSPLANTATION; THYMOGLOBULIN; BASIFIXIMAB;
D O I
10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.01.035
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Antibody induction is effective in preventing acute rejection, but its effects on long-term renal allograft function and survival remain controversial. Moreover, given the risks of antibody induction, full-dose lymphocyte-depleting therapy for low-risk patients is usually avoided. However, the benefit and risks associated with low-dose (Lo) rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG; 3-5 mg/kg total) induction in a low-risk population have not been explored. We now report the long-term outcomes in this patient population. We defined low risk as white, panel-reactive antibody < 30%, and non-Donor with Cardiac Death (DCD) recipients. We compared the risk of acute rejection and graft survival for both living donor (LD) and deceased donor (DD) recipients. The average dose of rATG was 3.1 +/- 1.2 mg/kg. Forty DD recipients received basiliximab (BSX) and 145 patients were induced with Lo rATG. Twenty LD recipients received BSX and 64 received Lo rATG. The groups did not differ in demographics, donor characteristics, and maintenance immunosuppression. At 8 years, patient survival was higher for LD patients compared to DD recipients (91% vs 45%,P = .004). In recipients of LD kidneys, 8-year patient survivals were not different comparing Lo rATG and BSX groups (92% vs 91%, respectively, P = .55). In LD, 8-year graft survival was excellent irrespective of induction (Lo rATG 100% vs BSX 98%); however, Lo rATG was associated with a lower rate of acute rejection (7.8% vs 35% BSX, P < .01) and better mean serum creatinine at 3 and 5 years (1.2 vs 1.5, P = .02 and 1.18 vs 1.54, P = .04, respectively). For DD, Lo rATG was associated with a better long-term graft survival (86% vs 76% BSX, P = .02). Viral infections and cancer rates were similar for Lo rATG and BSX. Thus, we conclude that Lo rATG induction may add long-term benefit in low-risk patients compared to anti-interleukin-2 receptor therapy without incurring additional risks of infectious or malignant diseases.
引用
收藏
页码:458 / 461
页数:4
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [31] Tools for a personalized tacrolimus dose adjustment in the follow-up of renal transplant recipients. Metabolizing phenotype according to CYP3A genetic polymorphisms versus concentration-dose ratio
    Vidal-Alabro, Anna
    Colom, Helena
    Fontova, Pere
    Cerezo, Gema
    Melilli, Edoardo
    Montero, Nuria
    Coloma, Ana
    Manonelles, Anna
    Fava, Alex
    Cruzado, Josep M.
    Torras, Joan
    Grinyo, Josep M.
    Lloberas, Nuria
    NEFROLOGIA, 2024, 44 (02): : 204 - 216
  • [32] Randomized trial of mycophenolate mofetil versus enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in primary renal transplant recipients given tacrolimus and daclizumab/thymoglobulin: One year follow-up
    Ciancio, Gaetano
    Burke, George W.
    Gaynor, Jeffrey J.
    Roth, David
    Sageshima, Junichiro
    Kupin, Warren
    Tueros, Lissett
    Hanson, Lois
    Rosen, Anne
    Ruiz, Phillip
    Miller, Joshua
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2008, 86 (01) : 67 - 74
  • [33] Efficacy and Safety of Everolimus Plus Low-Dose Tacrolimus Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil Plus Standard-Dose Tacrolimus in De Novo Renal Transplant Recipients: 12-Month Data
    Qazi, Y.
    Shaffer, D.
    Kaplan, B.
    Kim, D. Y.
    Luan, F. L.
    Peddi, V. R.
    Shihab, F.
    Tomlanovich, S.
    Yilmaz, S.
    McCague, K.
    Patel, D.
    Mulgaonkar, S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 17 (05) : 1358 - 1369
  • [34] Multicenter evaluation of efficacy and safety of low-dose versus high-dose valganciclovir for prevention of cytomegalovirus disease in donor and recipient positive (D plus/R plus ) renal transplant recipients
    Heldenbrand, Seth
    Li, Chenghui
    Cross, Rosemary P.
    DePiero, Kelly A.
    Dick, Travis B.
    Ferguson, Kara
    Kim, Miae
    Newkirk, Erin
    Park, Jeong M.
    Sudaria-Kerr, Janice
    Tichy, Eric M.
    Ueda, Kimi R.
    Weng, Renee
    Wisniewski, Jesse
    Gabardi, Steven
    TRANSPLANT INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2016, 18 (06) : 904 - 912