Minimally Invasive Posterior Tubular Microsurgical Approach for the Management of Symptomatic Synovial Cysts of the Lumbar and Cervical Spine

被引:6
作者
Soriano Sanchez, Jose Antonio [1 ]
Lewandrowski, Kai Uwe [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Franco Jimenez, Jose Alfonso [1 ,5 ]
Soto Garcia, Manuel Eduardo [1 ]
Soriano Solis, Sergio [1 ]
Rodriguez Garcia, Manuel [1 ]
Sanchez Escandon, Oscar [1 ]
Israel Romero Rangel, Jose Alberto [1 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Amer British Cowdray Med Ctr IAP, Spine Clin, Campus Santa Fe, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[2] Ctr Adv Spine Care Southern Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85712 USA
[3] Surg Inst Tucson, Tucson, AZ USA
[4] Fed Univ State Rio de Janeiro, UNIRIO, Dept Orthopaed, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[5] Childrens Hosp Federico Gomez, Pediat Neurosurg, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[6] Natl Inst Social Secur, Reg Gen Hosp 25, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[7] Univ Sonora, Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico
关键词
minimal invasive spine surgery; synovial cyst; instability; lumbar and cervical spine; tubular approach; fusion; posterior approach; TOTAL INTRAVENOUS ANESTHESIA; SURGICAL-TREATMENT; RESECTION; SURGERY; SERIES; DIAGNOSIS; FUSION;
D O I
10.14444/8134
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Synovial cysts are commonly associated with instability. Whether to fuse patients is a matter of controversy. Simple resection may offer favorable clinical outcomes but may come at the expense of recurrence rate. We describe our experience with the minimally invasive management of these lesions using microsurgical dissection through a tubular retractor system. Materials: A retrospective cohort study of symptomatic patients with synovial cysts treated by a minimally invasive tubular approach from 2001 to 2018 was performed. We evaluated variables such as preexisting spinal pathology, previous surgery, radiological findings, comorbidities, and secondary surgery requiring fusion. We used the visual analog scale (VAS), the Oswestry disability index (ODI), and the Macnab scale for clinical evaluation. Results: There were 35 patients with a mean age of 63 years. The mean duration of symptoms before surgery was 195 weeks. Axial pain was present in 77.1% of cases; radiculopathy was the main symptom in 94.3% of cases. The most frequent site was L4-L5 (62.8%). Presenting comorbidities were lumbar stenosis (28.6% of patients), spondylolisthesis (8.6%), and facet hypertrophy (31.4%). Mean surgical time was 143 minutes (range, 55-360 minutes). The mean hospital stay was 2 days, ranging from 1 to 5 days. No complications were encountered as a consequence of the surgical procedure. All patients showed neurophysiological improvement after surgical intervention. A total of 34 patients (97.14%) showed clinical improvement at the end of follow-up, averaging 17 months and ranging from 1 to 60 months, 28 patients (80%) had good to excellent Macnab outcomes, 6 patients (17.14%) were rated as fair, and 1 (2.86%) patient had a poor Macnab outcome. Radicular VAS significantly changed (P < .05) from a preoperative mean of 8.23 +/- 1.24 to a postoperative mean of 2.23 +/- 1.94. ODI significantly decreased (P < .05) from a preoperative of mean of 41.02 +/- 12.56 to a postoperative of mean of 11.82 +/- 10.56. We performed fusion at initial surgery in 37.1% of cases; however, 3 more patients required secondary fusion at follow-up. Conclusion: Our series corroborates the prior literature with a low incidence of synovial cysts in the cervical spine and none in the thoracic spine. The present work shows the efficacy of minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of these lesions. Synovial cysts were associated with instability, ultimately requiring fusion in the majority of patients. The authors' study includes a large patient series with minimally invasive microsurgical decompression performed through a tubular retractor to date.
引用
收藏
页码:1014 / 1024
页数:12
相关论文
共 45 条
[31]   Evaluating the effectiveness of the transcorporeal approach in minimally invasive spine surgery for cervical spinal disease: a comprehensive review and technical insights [J].
Liu, Yanting ;
Suvithayasiri, Siravich ;
Van Isseldyk, Facundo ;
Kotheeranurak, Vit ;
Jitpakdee, Khanathip ;
Choi, Kyung-Chul ;
Choi, Gun ;
Bae, Junseok ;
Kim, Jin-Sung .
BMC SURGERY, 2024, 24 (01)
[32]   Minimally invasive posterior cervical microforaminotomy in the lower cervical spine and C-T junction assisted by O-arm-based navigation [J].
Del Curto, David ;
Kim, Jin-Sung ;
Lee, Sang-Ho .
COMPUTER AIDED SURGERY, 2013, 18 (3-4) :76-83
[33]   A comparison of minimally invasive posterior cervical decompression and open anterior cervical decompression and instrumented fusion in the surgical management of degenerative cervical myelopathy [J].
Abbas, Syed F. ;
Spurgas, Morgan P. ;
Szewczyk, Benjamin S. ;
Yim, Benjamin ;
Ata, Ashar ;
German, John W. .
Neurosurgical Focus, 2016, 40 (06)
[34]   Iatrogenic Bowel Injury Following Minimally Invasive Lateral Approach to the Lumbar Spine: A Retrospective Analysis of 3 Cases [J].
Rustagi, Tarush ;
Yilmaz, Emre ;
Alonso, Fernando ;
Schmidt, Cameron ;
Oskouian, Rod ;
Tubbs, R. Shane ;
Chapman, Jens R. ;
Hopkins, Sarah ;
Schildhauer, Thomas A. ;
Fisahn, Christian .
GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2019, 9 (04) :375-382
[35]   Clinical and Radiographic Results of a Minimally Invasive Lateral Transpsoas Approach for Treatment of Septic Spondylodiscitis of the Thoracolumbar and Lumbar Spine [J].
He, Lei ;
Xie, Peigen ;
Shu, Tao ;
Liu, Zhongyu ;
Feng, Feng ;
Chen, Zihao ;
Chen, Ruiqiang ;
Zhang, Liangming ;
Rong, Limin .
WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 116 :E48-E56
[36]   Minimally invasive laminar lift and posterior cervical laminoplasty via the intermuscular approach: a canine model study [J].
Yan, Fei ;
Jin, Zejian ;
Song, Yuhong ;
Liu, Yinghao ;
Wang, Yonggang ;
Miao, Lei ;
Liu, Bin ;
Song, Hetian .
ACTA CIRURGICA BRASILEIRA, 2022, 37 (09)
[37]   Adjacent segment pathology following posterior lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: a comparison between minimally invasive and conventional open approach [J].
Mimura, Tetsuhiko ;
Tsutsumimoto, Takahiro ;
Yui, Mutsuki ;
Takahashi, Jun ;
Kuraishi, Shugo ;
Misawa, Hiromichi .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2021, 21 (08) :1297-1302
[38]   Comparison between minimally invasive spine stabilization with and without posterior decompression for the management of spinal metastases: a retrospective cohort study [J].
Uei, Hiroshi ;
Tokuhashi, Yasuaki ;
Maseda, Masafumi ;
Nakahashi, Masahiro ;
Sawada, Hirokatsu ;
Nakayama, Enshi ;
Soma, Hirotoki .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2018, 13
[39]   Minimally Invasive Approach for Complete Resection of a Cervical Intramedullary Tumor via a Dorsal Root Entry Zone Using Fixed Tubular Retractor [J].
Tarabay, Bilal ;
Gennari, Antoine ;
Boubez, Ghassan ;
Wang, Zhi ;
Shedid, Daniel ;
Yuh, Sung-Joo .
CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (08)
[40]   Comparison anterior minimally invasive oblique retroperitoneal approach and posterior transpedicular approach for debridement fusion in patients with lumbar vertebral osteomyelitis A randomized controlled trial protocol [J].
Gao, Xiang ;
Wan, Shu ;
Lv, Jie ;
Cheng, Wei ;
Zhang, Yangbin .
MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (44) :E22990