The safety, feasibility, and cost-effectiveness of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with mild acute biliary pancreatitis: A meta-analysis

被引:12
作者
Yuan, Xiaowei [1 ]
Xu, Bangren [2 ]
Wong, Minglai [3 ]
Chen, Yang [3 ]
Tang, Yajun [3 ]
Deng, Liang [3 ]
Tang, Di [3 ]
机构
[1] Guangzhou United Family Hosp, Dept Surg, 28 Fangyuan Rd, Guangzhou 510335, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Hong Kong, Shenzhen Hosp, Dept Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[3] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Hosp 7, Dept Gen Surg, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
来源
SURGEON-JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGES OF SURGEONS OF EDINBURGH AND IRELAND | 2021年 / 19卷 / 05期
关键词
Mild acute biliary pancreatitis; Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Surgical timing; Safety and feasibility; Cost-effectiveness; GALLSTONE PANCREATITIS; CLASSIFICATION; GUIDELINES; MANAGEMENT; ATLANTA;
D O I
10.1016/j.surge.2020.06.014
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: It remains controversial on the optimal timing of cholecystectomy for patients with mild acute biliary pancreatitis. This study aimed at comparing the safety, feasibility, and cost-effectiveness of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ELC, within 72 h after admission) versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy (DLC, beyond 72 h after admission) for patients with mild acute biliary pancreatitis. Methods: We performed a systematic search in the following databases: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane library. We only included articles from RCTs which designed to evaluate the complications, conversion to open cholecystectomy, recurrence of acute pancreatitis, the length of hospital stay, and costs between patients undergoing ELC and those undergoing DLC. We schemed to analyze data using STATA 15.0 with both the random-effects and the fixed-effect models. We computed relative risk (RR) and weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) based on the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis. Results: A total of 4 studies involving 439 (215 vs 224) patients were included. The difference of complication rate [3.3% vs 3.2%; RR 1.03 (0.35, 3.01), P = 0.961] and rate of conversion to open cholecystectomy [3.8% vs 3.3%; RR 1.13 (0.37, 3.43), P = 0.830] are insignificant between patients who underwent ELC and ones who underwent DLC. The difference of rate of recurrence of acute pancreatitis is significant between ELC and DLC (2.17% vs 8.99%; RR 0.24 (0.08-0.70), P = 0.009). ELC does not shorten the length of hospital stay (random-effects model analysis: WMD -1.09 days (-2.67, 0.48), P = 0.173; fixed-effect model analysis: WMD -0.62 days (-1.00, -0.24), P = 0.001). Conclusion: Compared to DLC, ELC is equally safe and feasible both in complication rate and rate of conversion to open procedure, and significantly reduces the recurrence rate of acute pancreatitis. (C) 2020 Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh (Scottish charity number SC005317) and Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:287 / 296
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Early elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy during the same hospital admission after recovery of an attack of mild acute biliary pancreatitis: is it feasible and safe? [J].
Abdelkader, Ashraf M. ;
Elwan, Taher H. ;
Hassanien, Sharaf E. Ali .
EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 39 (01) :42-48
[22]   Cholecystectomy and sphincterotomy in patients with mild acute biliary pancreatitis in Sweden 1988-2003: a nationwide register study [J].
Sandzen, Birger ;
Haapamaki, Markku M. ;
Nilsson, Erik ;
Stenlund, Hans C. ;
Oman, Mikael .
BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2009, 9 :80
[23]   Timing of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials [J].
Borzellino, Giuseppe ;
Khuri, Safi ;
Pisano, Michele ;
Mansour, Subhi ;
Allievi, Niccolo ;
Ansaloni, Luca ;
Kluger, Yoram .
WORLD JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2021, 16 (01)
[24]   Meta-analysis comparing early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis [J].
Wu, X. -D. ;
Tian, X. ;
Liu, M. -M. ;
Wu, L. ;
Zhao, S. ;
Zhao, L. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 102 (11) :1302-1313
[25]   Cost-effectiveness of emergency versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute gallbladder pathology [J].
Sutton, A. J. ;
Vohra, R. S. ;
Hollyman, M. ;
Marriott, P. J. ;
Buja, A. ;
Alderson, D. ;
Pasquali, S. ;
Griffiths, E. A. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 104 (01) :98-107
[26]   Cost-effectiveness of same-admission versus interval cholecystectomy after mild gallstone pancreatitis in the PONCHO trial [J].
da Costa, D. W. ;
Dijksman, L. M. ;
Bouwense, S. A. ;
Schepers, N. J. ;
Besselink, M. G. ;
van Santvoort, H. C. ;
Boerma, D. ;
Gooszen, H. G. ;
Dijkgraaf, M. G. W. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 103 (12) :1695-1703
[27]   Early Versus Late Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Patients with Acute Gallstone Pancreatitis [J].
Ashish Sharma ;
Apoorva Madapu ;
Jigisha Rakholiya ;
Shivy Sharma ;
Anil Jha .
SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine, 2021, 3 (2) :590-599
[28]   Early Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Versus Conservative Treatment in Patients With Acute Biliary Pancreatitis: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials [J].
Coutinho, Lara M. de A. ;
Bernardo, Wanderley M. ;
Rocha, Rodrigo S. ;
Marinho, Fabio R. ;
Delgado, Aureo ;
Moura, Eduardo T. H. ;
Matuguma, Sergio E. ;
Chaves, Dalton ;
Franzini, Tomazo A. P. ;
Sakai, Paulo ;
de Moura, Eduardo G. H. .
PANCREAS, 2018, 47 (04) :444-453
[29]   Is Routine Intraoperative Cholangiogram Necessary in Patients With Mild Acute Biliary Pancreatitis Undergoing Index Admission Cholecystectomy? [J].
Quarmby, Natalie M. ;
Vo, Minh Tu ;
Gananadha, Sivakumar .
AMERICAN SURGEON, 2024, 90 (11) :2780-2787
[30]   Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute mild gallstone pancreatitis. Is there a role for routine admission contrast-enhanced CT Scan? [J].
Kuestner, Stefan ;
Gallardo, Martin ;
Higuera, Felipe ;
Claria, Rodrigo Sanchez ;
Mazza, Oscar ;
Ardiles, Victoria ;
Pekolj, Juan ;
de Santibanes, Martin .
LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2024, 409 (01)