The safety, feasibility, and cost-effectiveness of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with mild acute biliary pancreatitis: A meta-analysis

被引:9
|
作者
Yuan, Xiaowei [1 ]
Xu, Bangren [2 ]
Wong, Minglai [3 ]
Chen, Yang [3 ]
Tang, Yajun [3 ]
Deng, Liang [3 ]
Tang, Di [3 ]
机构
[1] Guangzhou United Family Hosp, Dept Surg, 28 Fangyuan Rd, Guangzhou 510335, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Hong Kong, Shenzhen Hosp, Dept Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[3] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Hosp 7, Dept Gen Surg, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
来源
SURGEON-JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGES OF SURGEONS OF EDINBURGH AND IRELAND | 2021年 / 19卷 / 05期
关键词
Mild acute biliary pancreatitis; Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Surgical timing; Safety and feasibility; Cost-effectiveness; GALLSTONE PANCREATITIS; CLASSIFICATION; GUIDELINES; MANAGEMENT; ATLANTA;
D O I
10.1016/j.surge.2020.06.014
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: It remains controversial on the optimal timing of cholecystectomy for patients with mild acute biliary pancreatitis. This study aimed at comparing the safety, feasibility, and cost-effectiveness of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ELC, within 72 h after admission) versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy (DLC, beyond 72 h after admission) for patients with mild acute biliary pancreatitis. Methods: We performed a systematic search in the following databases: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane library. We only included articles from RCTs which designed to evaluate the complications, conversion to open cholecystectomy, recurrence of acute pancreatitis, the length of hospital stay, and costs between patients undergoing ELC and those undergoing DLC. We schemed to analyze data using STATA 15.0 with both the random-effects and the fixed-effect models. We computed relative risk (RR) and weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) based on the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis. Results: A total of 4 studies involving 439 (215 vs 224) patients were included. The difference of complication rate [3.3% vs 3.2%; RR 1.03 (0.35, 3.01), P = 0.961] and rate of conversion to open cholecystectomy [3.8% vs 3.3%; RR 1.13 (0.37, 3.43), P = 0.830] are insignificant between patients who underwent ELC and ones who underwent DLC. The difference of rate of recurrence of acute pancreatitis is significant between ELC and DLC (2.17% vs 8.99%; RR 0.24 (0.08-0.70), P = 0.009). ELC does not shorten the length of hospital stay (random-effects model analysis: WMD -1.09 days (-2.67, 0.48), P = 0.173; fixed-effect model analysis: WMD -0.62 days (-1.00, -0.24), P = 0.001). Conclusion: Compared to DLC, ELC is equally safe and feasible both in complication rate and rate of conversion to open procedure, and significantly reduces the recurrence rate of acute pancreatitis. (C) 2020 Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh (Scottish charity number SC005317) and Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:287 / 296
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cost-effectiveness of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for mild acute gallstone pancreatitis
    Morris, S.
    Gurusamy, K. S.
    Patel, N.
    Davidson, B. R.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 101 (07) : 828 - 835
  • [2] Meta-analysis of the cost-effectiveness of early versus delayed cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis
    Gallagher, T. K.
    Kelly, M. E.
    Hoti, E.
    BJS OPEN, 2019, 3 (02): : 146 - 152
  • [3] Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute mild gallstone pancreatitis: how early is safe?
    Giuffrida, Pablo
    Biagiola, David
    Cristiano, Agustin
    Ardiles, Victoria
    de Santibanes, Martin
    Sanchez Claria, Rodrigo
    Pekolj, Juan
    de Santibanes, Eduardo
    Mazza, Oscar
    UPDATES IN SURGERY, 2020, 72 (01) : 129 - 135
  • [4] Timing of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy After Mild Biliary Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Yang, Du-Jiang
    Lu, Hui-Min
    Guo, Qiang
    Lu, Shan
    Zhang, Ling
    Hu, Wei-Ming
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 28 (04): : 379 - 388
  • [5] Early Versus Delayed Cholecystectomy for Acute Biliary Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Prasanth, Jayaraj
    Prasad, Manya
    Mahapatra, Soumya Jagannath
    Krishna, Asuri
    Prakash, Om
    Garg, Pramod Kumar
    Bansal, Virinder Kumar
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 46 (06) : 1359 - 1375
  • [6] Safety of early same-admission laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute mild biliary pancreatitis. A retrospective study for acute pancreatitis
    Lyu, Yunxiao
    Cheng, Yunxiao
    Wang, Bin
    Zhao, Sicong
    Chen, Liang
    VIDEOSURGERY AND OTHER MINIINVASIVE TECHNIQUES, 2022, 17 (01) : 150 - 155
  • [7] Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy following acute biliary pancreatitis expedites recovery
    Egin, Seracettin
    Yesiltas, Metin
    Gokcek, Berk
    Tezer, Hakan
    Karahan, Servet Rustu
    ULUSAL TRAVMA VE ACIL CERRAHI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF TRAUMA & EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2017, 23 (06): : 495 - 500
  • [8] The optimal timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with mild gallstone pancreatitis A meta-analysis
    Zhong, Fu-ping
    Wang, Kai
    Tan, Xue-qin
    Nie, Jian
    Huang, Wen-feng
    Wang, Xiao-fang
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (40)
  • [9] The safety of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (<48 hours) for patients with mild gallstone pancreatitis: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis
    Randial Perez, Leonardo Jose
    Fernando Parra, Juan
    Aldana Dimas, Guillermo
    CIRUGIA ESPANOLA, 2014, 92 (02): : 107 - 113
  • [10] Same-admission versus delayed cholecystectomy for mild acute biliary pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lyu, Yun-Xiao
    Cheng, Yun-Xiao
    Jin, Hang-Fei
    Jin, Xin
    Cheng, Bin
    Lu, Dian
    BMC SURGERY, 2018, 18