A new approach to explain farmers' adoption of climate change mitigation measures

被引:30
作者
Moerkerken, Albert [1 ,2 ]
Blasch, Julia [2 ]
van Beukering, Pieter [2 ]
van Well, Erik [3 ]
机构
[1] Netherlands Enterprise Agcy RVO, Croeselaan 15, NL-3521 BJ Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Inst Environm Studies IVM, De Boelelaan 1085, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] CLM Res & Advisory, Gutenbergweg 1, NL-4104 BA Culemborg, Netherlands
关键词
Climate change mitigation; Agriculture; Communication campaign; Energy use; Farmer behaviour; GREENHOUSE-GAS MITIGATION; RISK PERCEPTIONS; DECISION-MAKING; ADAPTATION; BARRIERS; POLICY; DETERMINANTS; AGRICULTURE; INNOVATIONS; STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.1007/s10584-019-02595-3
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The determinants of farmers' decisions to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are currently not well understood. This study takes several new angles in investigating farmers' climate change mitigation behaviour. Based on two identical surveys among representative samples of Dutch farmers, this study examines the underlying determinants and motivating factors for three different types of climate change mitigation measures on farms: energy saving, the production of renewable energy and reduction of emissions of methane and nitrous oxide (non-CO2 emissions). Furthermore, the study explores whether farmers' awareness and behaviour has been influenced by a communication campaign carried out by the government of the Netherlands between 2012 and 2015. Four major conclusions emerge. Firstly, the analyses demonstrate that accounting for the cost-effectiveness and technology readiness level (TRL) of different types of climate change mitigation measures provides for a better understanding of the factors that motivate farmers to adopt these measures. Secondly, neither the willingness to take GHG reduction measures nor knowledge on GHG emissions are consistent motivating factors for energy-related measures. Thirdly, it seems that external factors, such as economic hardship, dominate the overall environmental awareness of farmers. Fourthly, the farmer's propensity to innovate proved to be the strongest and most consistent predictor of both the willingness and the actual adoption of climate change mitigation technologies. Therefore, focusing on making farmers more open to change and general innovation in campaigns in the agricultural sector might be more effective than campaigns focusing specifically on climate change mitigation.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 161
页数:21
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[2]   Knowledge and the Prediction of Behavior: The Role of Information Accuracy in the Theory of Planned Behavior [J].
Ajzen, Icek ;
Joyce, Nicholas ;
Sheikh, Sana ;
Cote, Nicole Gilbert .
BASIC AND APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 33 (02) :101-117
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2003, J EXTENSION
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Diffusionofinnovations
[5]   Understanding Corn Belt farmer perspectives on climate change to inform engagement strategies for adaptation and mitigation [J].
Arbuckle, J. G., Jr. ;
Hobbs, J. ;
Loy, A. ;
Morton, L. W. ;
Prokopy, L. S. ;
Tyndall, J. .
JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION, 2014, 69 (06) :505-516
[6]   Farmer beliefs and concerns about climate change and attitudes toward adaptation and mitigation: Evidence from Iowa [J].
Arbuckle, J. Gordon, Jr. ;
Morton, Lois Wright ;
Hobbs, Jon .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2013, 118 (3-4) :551-563
[7]   A typology of dairy farmer perceptions towards climate change [J].
Barnes, Andrew P. ;
Toma, Luiza .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2012, 112 (02) :507-522
[8]   Achieving successful farmer engagement on greenhouse gas emission mitigation [J].
Burbi, Sara ;
Baines, R. N. ;
Conway, J. S. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 14 (04) :466-483
[9]   The effects of extreme drought on climate change beliefs, risk perceptions, and adaptation attitudes [J].
Carlton, J. Stuart ;
Mase, Amber S. ;
Knutson, Cody L. ;
Lemos, Maria Carmen ;
Haigh, Tonya ;
Todey, Dennis P. ;
Prokopy, Linda S. .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2016, 135 (02) :211-226
[10]   Greenhouse gas mitigation in animal production: towards an integrated life cycle sustainability assessment [J].
de Boer, I. J. M. ;
Cederberg, C. ;
Eady, S. ;
Gollnow, S. ;
Kristensen, T. ;
Macleod, M. ;
Meul, M. ;
Nemecek, T. ;
Phong, L. T. ;
Thoma, G. ;
van der Werf, H. M. G. ;
Williams, A. G. ;
Zonderland-Thomassen, M. A. .
CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2011, 3 (05) :423-431