Psychophysiological arousal and inter- and intraindividual differences in risk-sensitive decision making

被引:14
作者
Studer, Bettina [1 ,2 ]
Scheibehenne, Benjamin [3 ]
Clark, Luke [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Psychol, BCNI, Cambridge, England
[2] Univ Dusseldorf, Fac Med, Inst Clin Neurosci & Med Psychol, Dusseldorf, Germany
[3] Univ Geneva, Geneva Sch Econ & Management, Geneva, Switzerland
[4] Univ British Columbia, Dept Psychol, Ctr Gambling Res, Vancouver, BC, Canada
基金
英国医学研究理事会; 英国惠康基金;
关键词
Decision making; Peripheral arousal; Risk; Personality; Bayesian; VENTROMEDIAL PREFRONTAL CORTEX; SKIN-CONDUCTANCE RESPONSES; SEX-RELATED DIFFERENCES; IOWA-GAMBLING-TASK; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; ELECTRODERMAL ACTIVITY; PARAMETER-ESTIMATION; AUTONOMIC RESPONSE; PROBLEM GAMBLERS; SOMATIC MARKERS;
D O I
10.1111/psyp.12627
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The current study assessed peripheral responses during decision making under explicit risk, and tested whether intraindividual variability in choice behavior can be explained by fluctuations in peripheral arousal. Electrodermal activity (EDA) and heart rate (HR) were monitored in healthy volunteers (N=68) during the Roulette Betting Task. In this task, participants were presented with risky gambles to bet on, with the chances of winning varying across trials. Hierarchical Bayesian analyses demonstrated that EDA and HR acceleration responses during the decision phase were sensitive to the chances of winning. Interindividual differences in this peripheral reactivity during risky decision making were related to trait sensitivity to punishment and trait sensitivity to reward. Moreover, trial-by-trial variation in EDA and HR acceleration responses predicted a small portion of intraindividual variability in betting choices. Our results show that psychophysiological responses are sensitive to explicit risk and can help explain intraindividual heterogeneity in choice behavior.
引用
收藏
页码:940 / 950
页数:11
相关论文
共 96 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1994, Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Experimental economics, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1011486405114
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2001, CANADIAN PROBLEM GAM
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1981, MODEL PERSONALITY
[5]   Do facets of self-reported impulsivity predict decision-making under ambiguity and risk? Evidence from a community sample [J].
Bayard, Sophie ;
Raffard, Stephane ;
Gely-Nargeot, Marie-Christine .
PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2011, 190 (2-3) :322-326
[6]   INSENSITIVITY TO FUTURE CONSEQUENCES FOLLOWING DAMAGE TO HUMAN PREFRONTAL CORTEX [J].
BECHARA, A ;
DAMASIO, AR ;
DAMASIO, H ;
ANDERSON, SW .
COGNITION, 1994, 50 (1-3) :7-15
[7]  
Bechara A, 1999, J NEUROSCI, V19, P5473
[8]   Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy [J].
Bechara, A ;
Damasio, H ;
Tranel, D ;
Damasio, AR .
SCIENCE, 1997, 275 (5304) :1293-1295
[9]   A Model of Probabilistic Choice Satisfying First-Order Stochastic Dominance [J].
Blavatskyy, Pavlo R. .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2011, 57 (03) :542-548
[10]   Sex-related differences in a gambling task and its neurological correlates [J].
Bolla, KI ;
Eldreth, DA ;
Matochik, JA ;
Cadet, JL .
CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2004, 14 (11) :1226-1232