Treatment of peri-implantitis by the Vector® system -: A pilot study

被引:131
作者
Karring, ES [1 ]
Stavropoulos, A [1 ]
Ellegaard, B [1 ]
Karring, T [1 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Royal Dent Coll, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Periodontol & Oral Gerontol, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark
关键词
curettes; peri-implantitis; randomized controlled clinical trial; ultrasonic instrument; Vector((R)) system;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01141.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Aim: To compare the effectiveness of treatment of peri-implantitis with a novel ultrasonic device, the Vector((R)) system, with that of subgingival debridement with carbon fiber curettes. Material and methods: The study, comprising 11 patients with at least two screw type implants with bleeding on probing (BOP), probing pocket depth (PPD)>= 5 mm, and at least 1.5 mm radiographic bone loss and exposed implant threads, was carried out as a single blind randomized clinical trial. At baseline one randomly chosen implant in each patient was treated by the Vector((R)) system (test) while the other implant (control) was treated by submucosal debridement with a carbon fiber curette. After 3 months, the same treatments were repeated. Plaque, BOP, and PPD were recorded on all implant surfaces at baseline, and after 3 and 6 months. Bone levels were recorded on radiographs taken prior to the start of the study, and after 6 months. Results: Oral hygiene around both test and control implants was improved at 3 and 6 months compared with baseline. At 6 months, four of the Vector((R))-treated sites, and only one site treated with curettes, had stopped to bleed. In neither the test nor the control group, were there any differences between baseline and 6 months regarding PPD and bone levels. Conclusion: Although there was a greater reduction in the number of sites with BOP following treatment with the Vector((R)) system than following instrumentation with carbon fiber curettes, there was no significant difference between the two methods.
引用
收藏
页码:288 / 293
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
ALBREKTSSON T, 1994, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1ST EUROPEAN WORKSHOP ON PERIODONTOLOGY, P365
[2]  
Augthun M, 1997, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V12, P106
[3]   The soft tissue barrier at implants and teeth [J].
Berglundh, T. ;
Lindhe, J. ;
Ericsson, I. ;
Marinello, C. P. ;
Liljenberg, B. ;
Thomsen, P. .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1991, 2 (02) :81-90
[4]  
Esposito M, 2002, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI 10.1002/14651858. CD003069
[5]  
HAHN R, 2000, KLINISCHE ANVENDUN S, V11
[6]  
HARTSCHEN J, 2002, PARONDONTOLOGIE, V13, P133
[7]   Effects of a new ultrasonic scaler on fibroblast attachment to root surfaces: a scanning electron microscopy analysis [J].
Kishida, M ;
Sato, S ;
Ito, K .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTAL RESEARCH, 2004, 39 (02) :111-119
[8]  
Lang N P, 1993, Clin Oral Implants Res, V4, P2, DOI 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1993.040101.x
[9]   ABSENCE OF BLEEDING ON PROBING - AN INDICATOR OF PERIODONTAL STABILITY [J].
LANG, NP ;
ADLER, R ;
JOSS, A ;
NYMAN, S .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 1990, 17 (10) :714-721
[10]   BLEEDING ON PROBING AS IT RELATES TO PROBING PRESSURE AND GINGIVAL HEALTH [J].
LANG, NP ;
NYMAN, S ;
SENN, C ;
JOSS, A .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 1991, 18 (04) :257-261