Clinical Predictors of Significant White-Coat Effect in Non-Diabetic Hypertensive Patients

被引:0
|
作者
Huang, Chin-Chou [1 ,2 ,4 ,6 ]
Wu, Tao-Cheng [2 ,4 ,5 ]
Lin, Shing-Jong [1 ,2 ,4 ,5 ]
Chen, Jaw-Wen [1 ,2 ,4 ,6 ]
Leu, Hsin-Bang [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Med Res & Educ, Taipei 112, Taiwan
[2] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Div Cardiol, Dept Med, Taipei 112, Taiwan
[3] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Hlth Care & Mgmt Ctr, Taipei 112, Taiwan
[4] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Cardiovasc Res Ctr, Taipei 112, Taiwan
[5] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Inst Clin Med, Taipei 112, Taiwan
[6] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Inst Pharmacol, Taipei 112, Taiwan
关键词
Hypertension; Predictors; White-coat effect; AMBULATORY BLOOD-PRESSURE; SUSTAINED HYPERTENSION; PROGNOSTIC VALUE; DETERMINANTS; RISK; HOME; MORTALITY; OFFICE; ASSOCIATION; POPULATION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The presence of a clinically important white-coat effect (WCE) may lead to incorrect hypertension management. The aim of our study was to investigate the possible causes of WCE in non-diabetic hypertensive patients. Methods: Consecutive non-diabetic hypertensive patients were evaluated. A comprehensive history-taking and physical check-up were conducted. All patients received a series of studies including office blood pressure (BP), 24-hour ambulatory BP recording, and blood sampling. WCE was defined as the difference between office systolic BP (SBP) and daytime SBP. Significant WCE was defined as [(office SBP - daytime SBP)/office SBP >= 10%]. Results: Totally 121 patients (mean age 45.70 +/- 10.61 years, 45 females) were enrolled into our study. Totally 33 patients (27.3%) had significant WCE in the study. Patients with significant WCE had more female gender (p < 0.001), lower body mass index (p = 0.012), higher office SBP (p < 0.001), lower office heart rate (HR, p = 0.005), lower triglyceride (p = 0.008), alanine aminotransferase (p = 0.021) and aspartate aminotransferase (p = 0.008), and higher high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (p = 0.039). Multivariate analysis showed that female gender [odds ratio (OR) 3.290, 95% confident interval (CI) 1.018-10.631, p = 0.047], office SBP (OR 1.079, 95% CI 1.034-1.125, p < 0.001), and office HR (OR 0.930, 95% CI 0.885-0.978, p = 0.005) could predict the patients with significant WCE. Conclusion: Significant WCE could be predicted by female gender, higher office SBP, and lower office HR. Our current study may help us to identify patients with WCE and to improve the treatment of non-diabetic hypertensive patients.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 156
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Influence of the hospital environment and presence of the physician on the white-coat effect
    Adiyaman, Ahmet
    Aksoy, Ismail
    Deinum, Jaap
    Staessen, Jan A.
    Thien, Theo
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2015, 33 (11) : 2245 - 2249
  • [32] Prevalence of Masked and White-Coat Hypertension in Pre-Hypertensive and Stage 1 Hypertensive patients with the use of TeleMRPA
    Sebba Barros, Weimar Kunz
    Magalhaes-Feitosa, Audes Diogenes
    Duarte Barbosa, Eduardo Costa
    Miranda, Roberto Dischinger
    Brandao, Andrea Araujo
    Oliveira Vitorino, Priscila Valverde
    de Souza Ribeiro, Lucio Paulo
    Gomes, Marco Mota
    ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2019, 113 (05) : 970 - 975
  • [33] Talking effect and white coat phenomenon in hypertensive patients
    LePailleur, C
    Vacheron, A
    Landais, P
    MounierVehier, C
    Feder, JM
    Montgermont, P
    Jais, JP
    Metzger, JP
    BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 1996, 22 (03) : 114 - 122
  • [34] Independent predictors of isolated clinic ('white-coat') hypertension
    Verdecchia, P
    Palatini, P
    Schillaci, G
    Mormino, P
    Porcellati, C
    Pessina, AC
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2001, 19 (06) : 1015 - 1020
  • [35] THE CENTRAL AORTIC PRESSURE IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS MAY BE COMPANIED WITH THE WHITE-COAT PHENOMENON
    Ling, Zhou
    Lin, Jinxiu
    Chen, Fang
    Liu, Qing
    Wei, Che
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2018, 36 : E151 - E152
  • [36] Prevalence and clinical characteristics of white-coat hypertension based on different definition criteria in untreated and treated patients
    de la Sierra, Alejandro
    Vinyoles, Ernest
    Banegas, Jose R.
    Segura, Julian
    Gorostidi, Manuel
    de la Cruz, Juan J.
    Ruilope, Luis M.
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2017, 35 (12) : 2388 - 2394
  • [37] Anxiety and outcome expectations predict the white-coat effect
    Jhalani, J
    Goyal, T
    Clemow, L
    Schwartz, JE
    Pickering, TG
    Gerin, W
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2005, 10 (06) : 317 - 319
  • [38] Diagnosis and management of patients with white-coat and masked hypertension
    Mancia, Giuseppe
    Bombelli, Michele
    Seravalle, Gino
    Grassi, Guido
    NATURE REVIEWS CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 8 (12) : 686 - 693
  • [39] Comparison of the white-coat effect in community pharmacy versus the physician's office: the Palmera study
    Sendra-Lillo, Jose
    Sabater-Hernandez, Daniel
    Sendra-Ortola, Angel
    Martinez-Martinez, Fernando
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2011, 16 (02) : 62 - 66
  • [40] The importance of the clinical observer in the development of a white-coat effect in African-American patients with hypertension
    Labinson, Paul T.
    Giacco, Sharon
    Gift, Henry
    Mansoor, George A.
    White, William B.
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2008, 13 (03) : 139 - 142