Clinical Predictors of Significant White-Coat Effect in Non-Diabetic Hypertensive Patients

被引:0
|
作者
Huang, Chin-Chou [1 ,2 ,4 ,6 ]
Wu, Tao-Cheng [2 ,4 ,5 ]
Lin, Shing-Jong [1 ,2 ,4 ,5 ]
Chen, Jaw-Wen [1 ,2 ,4 ,6 ]
Leu, Hsin-Bang [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Med Res & Educ, Taipei 112, Taiwan
[2] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Div Cardiol, Dept Med, Taipei 112, Taiwan
[3] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Hlth Care & Mgmt Ctr, Taipei 112, Taiwan
[4] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Cardiovasc Res Ctr, Taipei 112, Taiwan
[5] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Inst Clin Med, Taipei 112, Taiwan
[6] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Inst Pharmacol, Taipei 112, Taiwan
关键词
Hypertension; Predictors; White-coat effect; AMBULATORY BLOOD-PRESSURE; SUSTAINED HYPERTENSION; PROGNOSTIC VALUE; DETERMINANTS; RISK; HOME; MORTALITY; OFFICE; ASSOCIATION; POPULATION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The presence of a clinically important white-coat effect (WCE) may lead to incorrect hypertension management. The aim of our study was to investigate the possible causes of WCE in non-diabetic hypertensive patients. Methods: Consecutive non-diabetic hypertensive patients were evaluated. A comprehensive history-taking and physical check-up were conducted. All patients received a series of studies including office blood pressure (BP), 24-hour ambulatory BP recording, and blood sampling. WCE was defined as the difference between office systolic BP (SBP) and daytime SBP. Significant WCE was defined as [(office SBP - daytime SBP)/office SBP >= 10%]. Results: Totally 121 patients (mean age 45.70 +/- 10.61 years, 45 females) were enrolled into our study. Totally 33 patients (27.3%) had significant WCE in the study. Patients with significant WCE had more female gender (p < 0.001), lower body mass index (p = 0.012), higher office SBP (p < 0.001), lower office heart rate (HR, p = 0.005), lower triglyceride (p = 0.008), alanine aminotransferase (p = 0.021) and aspartate aminotransferase (p = 0.008), and higher high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (p = 0.039). Multivariate analysis showed that female gender [odds ratio (OR) 3.290, 95% confident interval (CI) 1.018-10.631, p = 0.047], office SBP (OR 1.079, 95% CI 1.034-1.125, p < 0.001), and office HR (OR 0.930, 95% CI 0.885-0.978, p = 0.005) could predict the patients with significant WCE. Conclusion: Significant WCE could be predicted by female gender, higher office SBP, and lower office HR. Our current study may help us to identify patients with WCE and to improve the treatment of non-diabetic hypertensive patients.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 156
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Performance of the automated BpTRU™ measurement device in the assessment of white-coat hypertension and white-coat effect
    Culleton, BF
    McKay, DW
    Campbell, NR
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2006, 11 (01) : 37 - 42
  • [22] Arterial Stiffness in Treated Hypertensive Patients With White-Coat Hypertension
    Barochiner, Jessica
    Aparicio, Lucas S.
    Alfie, Jose
    Morales, Margarita S.
    Cuffaro, Paula E.
    Rada, Marcelo A.
    Marin, Marcos J.
    Galarza, Carlos R.
    Waisman, Gabriel D.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL HYPERTENSION, 2017, 19 (01) : 6 - 10
  • [23] White-coat effect in normotension and hypertension
    Zakopoulos, NA
    Kotsis, VT
    Pitiriga, VC
    Toumanidis, ST
    Lekakis, JP
    Nanas, SN
    Vemmos, KN
    Stamatelopoulos, SF
    Moulopoulos, SD
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2002, 7 (05) : 271 - 276
  • [24] Magnitude of the White-Coat Effect in the Community Pharmacy Setting: The MEPAFAR Study
    Sabater-Hernandez, Daniel
    de la Sierra, Alejandro
    Sanchez-Villegas, Pablo
    Baena, Maria I.
    Amariles, Pedro
    Faus, Maria J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2011, 24 (08) : 887 - 892
  • [25] White coat effect and masked uncontrolled hypertension in treated hypertensive-diabetic patients: Prevalence and target organ damage
    Leiria, Liana F.
    Severo, Mateus D.
    Ledur, Priscila S.
    Becker, Alexandre D.
    Aguiar, Fernanda M.
    Massierer, Daniela
    Freitas, Valeria C.
    Schaan, Beatriz D.
    Gus, Miguel
    JOURNAL OF DIABETES, 2015, 7 (05) : 699 - 707
  • [26] Determinants of Negative White-Coat Effect In Treated Hypertensive Patients: The Jichi Morning Hypertension Research (J-MORE) Study
    Kabutoya, Tomoyuki
    Ishikawa, Joji
    Hoshide, Satoshi
    Eguchi, Kazuo
    Ishikawa, Shizukiyo
    Shimada, Kazuyuki
    Kario, Kazuomi
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2009, 22 (01) : 35 - 40
  • [27] The clinical significance of white-coat and masked hypertension
    Verdecchia, Paolo
    Angeli, Fabio
    Gattobigio, Roberto
    Borgioni, Claudia
    Castellani, Claudia
    Sardone, Mariagrazia
    Reboldi, Giahpaolo
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2007, 12 (06) : 387 - 389
  • [28] Echocardiographic evaluation of epicardial adipose tissue in non-diabetic, non-hypertensive hemodialysis patients
    Ozkurt, Sultan
    Karavelioglu, Yusuf
    Musmul, Ahmet
    RENAL FAILURE, 2013, 35 (06) : 891 - 895
  • [29] White-coat effect on orthostatic hypotension: a nationwide survey of Japanese general practitioners
    Yuasa, Shohei
    Yamamoto, Hareaki
    Suzuki, Yoshiro
    Chin, Keiichi
    Ukai, Hiroshi
    Kobayashi, Yusuke
    Yano, Yuichiro
    Mori, Hisao
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2022, 27 (05) : 314 - 319
  • [30] Influence of the hospital environment and presence of the physician on the white-coat effect
    Adiyaman, Ahmet
    Aksoy, Ismail
    Deinum, Jaap
    Staessen, Jan A.
    Thien, Theo
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2015, 33 (11) : 2245 - 2249