Clinical Predictors of Significant White-Coat Effect in Non-Diabetic Hypertensive Patients

被引:0
|
作者
Huang, Chin-Chou [1 ,2 ,4 ,6 ]
Wu, Tao-Cheng [2 ,4 ,5 ]
Lin, Shing-Jong [1 ,2 ,4 ,5 ]
Chen, Jaw-Wen [1 ,2 ,4 ,6 ]
Leu, Hsin-Bang [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Med Res & Educ, Taipei 112, Taiwan
[2] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Div Cardiol, Dept Med, Taipei 112, Taiwan
[3] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Hlth Care & Mgmt Ctr, Taipei 112, Taiwan
[4] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Cardiovasc Res Ctr, Taipei 112, Taiwan
[5] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Inst Clin Med, Taipei 112, Taiwan
[6] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Inst Pharmacol, Taipei 112, Taiwan
关键词
Hypertension; Predictors; White-coat effect; AMBULATORY BLOOD-PRESSURE; SUSTAINED HYPERTENSION; PROGNOSTIC VALUE; DETERMINANTS; RISK; HOME; MORTALITY; OFFICE; ASSOCIATION; POPULATION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The presence of a clinically important white-coat effect (WCE) may lead to incorrect hypertension management. The aim of our study was to investigate the possible causes of WCE in non-diabetic hypertensive patients. Methods: Consecutive non-diabetic hypertensive patients were evaluated. A comprehensive history-taking and physical check-up were conducted. All patients received a series of studies including office blood pressure (BP), 24-hour ambulatory BP recording, and blood sampling. WCE was defined as the difference between office systolic BP (SBP) and daytime SBP. Significant WCE was defined as [(office SBP - daytime SBP)/office SBP >= 10%]. Results: Totally 121 patients (mean age 45.70 +/- 10.61 years, 45 females) were enrolled into our study. Totally 33 patients (27.3%) had significant WCE in the study. Patients with significant WCE had more female gender (p < 0.001), lower body mass index (p = 0.012), higher office SBP (p < 0.001), lower office heart rate (HR, p = 0.005), lower triglyceride (p = 0.008), alanine aminotransferase (p = 0.021) and aspartate aminotransferase (p = 0.008), and higher high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (p = 0.039). Multivariate analysis showed that female gender [odds ratio (OR) 3.290, 95% confident interval (CI) 1.018-10.631, p = 0.047], office SBP (OR 1.079, 95% CI 1.034-1.125, p < 0.001), and office HR (OR 0.930, 95% CI 0.885-0.978, p = 0.005) could predict the patients with significant WCE. Conclusion: Significant WCE could be predicted by female gender, higher office SBP, and lower office HR. Our current study may help us to identify patients with WCE and to improve the treatment of non-diabetic hypertensive patients.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 156
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Can Pulse Pressure Predict the White-Coat Effect in Treated Hypertensive Patients?
    Yoon, Hyun Ju
    Ahn, Youngkeun
    Kim, Kye Hun
    Park, Jong Chun
    Park, Jeong Bae
    Park, Chang Gyu
    Youn, Ho Joong
    Choi, Dong Ju
    Shin, Joon-Han
    Kim, Dong-Woon
    Rim, Se Joong
    Bae, Jang Ho
    Kim, Chong Wook
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL HYPERTENSION, 2012, 34 (08) : 555 - 560
  • [12] Determinants of the white-coat effect in hypertensive subjects
    Mansoor, GA
    McCabe, EJ
    White, WB
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN HYPERTENSION, 1996, 10 (02) : 87 - 92
  • [13] White coat effect in patients with hypertension
    Andreeva, G. F.
    Gorbunov, V. M.
    Antipushina, D. N.
    Platonova, E., V
    RATIONAL PHARMACOTHERAPY IN CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 19 (05) : 508 - 519
  • [14] Effect of Long-Term Antihypertensive Treatment on White-Coat Hypertension
    Mancia, Giuseppe
    Facchetti, Rita
    Parati, Gianfranco
    Zanchetti, Alberto
    HYPERTENSION, 2014, 64 (06) : 1388 - U467
  • [15] Assessment of the white-coat effect
    Gerin, W
    Ogedegbe, G
    Schwartz, JE
    Chaplin, WF
    Goyal, T
    Clemow, L
    Davidson, KW
    Burg, M
    Lipsky, S
    Kentor, R
    Jhalani, J
    Shimbo, D
    Pickering, TG
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2006, 24 (01) : 67 - 74
  • [16] Serum phosphate in white-coat hypertensive patients: focus on dipping status and metabolic syndrome
    Vyssoulis, Gregory
    Karpanou, Eva
    Tzamou, Vanessa
    Kyvelou, Stella-Maria
    Michaelidis, Andreas
    Stefanadis, Christodoulos
    HYPERTENSION RESEARCH, 2010, 33 (08) : 825 - 830
  • [17] Parity as a factor affecting the white-coat effect in pregnant women: the BOSHI study
    Ishikuro, Mami
    Obara, Taku
    Metoki, Hirohito
    Ohkubo, Takayoshi
    Iwama, Noriyuki
    Katagiri, Mikiko
    Nishigori, Hidekazu
    Narikawa, Yoko
    Yagihashi, Katsuyo
    Kikuya, Masahiro
    Yaegashi, Nobuo
    Hoshi, Kazuhiko
    Suzuki, Masakuni
    Kuriyama, Shinichi
    Imai, Yutaka
    HYPERTENSION RESEARCH, 2015, 38 (11) : 770 - 775
  • [18] Reverse white-coat effect as an independent risk for microalbuminuria in treated hypertensive patients
    Kato, Toako
    Horio, Takeshi
    Tomiyama, Mari
    Kamide, Kei
    Nakamura, Satoko
    Yoshihara, Fumiki
    Nakata, Hiroto
    Nakahama, Hajime
    Kawano, Yuhei
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2007, 22 (03) : 911 - 916
  • [19] Inter-arm blood pressure differences compared with ambulatory monitoring: a manifestation of the 'white-coat' effect?
    Martin, Una
    Holder, Roger
    Hodgkinson, James
    McManus, Richard
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2013, 63 (607) : E97 - E103
  • [20] Is white-coat effect a uniform phenomenon?
    Winnicki, M
    Somers, VK
    Hoffmann, M
    Accurso, V
    D'Este, D
    Zanatta, G
    Bartolazzi, A
    Pawlowski, R
    Semplicini, A
    Siffert, W
    Palatini, P
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2003, 16 (05) : 82A - 83A