Design principles for establishing a multi-sided open innovation platform: lessons learned from an action research study in the medical technology industry

被引:12
作者
Daiberl, Christofer F. [1 ]
Oks, Sascha Julian [1 ]
Roth, Angela [1 ]
Moeslein, Kathrin M. [1 ,2 ]
Alter, Steven [3 ]
机构
[1] Friedrich Alexander Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Chair Informat Syst Innovat & Value Creat, Lange Gasse 20, D-90403 Nurnberg, Germany
[2] HHL Leipzig Grad Sch Management, CLIC, Jahnallee 59, D-04109 Leipzig, Germany
[3] Univ San Francisco, 2130 Fulton St, San Francisco, CA USA
关键词
Multi-sided platforms; Open innovation; Work system theory; Medical technology industry cluster; Action research; WORK SYSTEM-THEORY; INFORMATION-SYSTEMS; ONLINE COMMUNITIES; COLLABORATION; PERSPECTIVE; CHALLENGES; COMPETITIONS; CONTESTS; NETWORKS; STRATEGY;
D O I
10.1007/s12525-018-0325-2
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Innovation in the medical technology (med tech) industry has a major impact on well-being in society. Open innovation has the potential to accelerate the development of new or improved healthcare solutions. Building on work system theory (WST), this paper explores how a multi-sided open innovation platform can systematically be established in a German med tech industry cluster in situations where firms had no prior experience with this approach. We aim to uncover problems that may arise and identify opportunities for overcoming them. We performed an action research study in which we implemented and evaluated a multi-sided web-based open innovation platform in four real-world innovation challenges. Analyzing the four different challenges fostered a deeper understanding of the conceptual and organizational aspects of establishing the multi-sided open innovation platform as part of a larger work system. Reflecting on the findings, we developed five design principles that shall support the establishment of multi-sided open innovation platforms in other contexts. Thus, this paper contributes to both theory and practice.
引用
收藏
页码:711 / 728
页数:18
相关论文
共 76 条
[21]   How open is innovation? [J].
Dahlander, Linus ;
Gann, David M. .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2010, 39 (06) :699-709
[22]   Principles of canonical action research [J].
Davison, R ;
Martinsons, MG ;
Kock, N .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS JOURNAL, 2004, 14 (01) :65-86
[23]   The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage [J].
Dyer, JH ;
Singh, H .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1998, 23 (04) :660-679
[24]   Community engineering for innovations: the ideas competition as a method to nurture a virtual community for innovations [J].
Ebner, Winfried ;
Leimeister, Jan Marco ;
Krcmar, Helmut .
R & D MANAGEMENT, 2009, 39 (04) :342-356
[25]   Open R&D and open innovation: exploring the phenomenon [J].
Enkel, Ellen ;
Gassmann, Oliver ;
Chesbrough, Henry .
R & D MANAGEMENT, 2009, 39 (04) :311-316
[26]  
Ernst & Young, 2017, CHANG ACC CAN MEDT M
[27]   Innovation communities: the role of networks of promotors in Open Innovation [J].
Fichter, Klaus .
R & D MANAGEMENT, 2009, 39 (04) :357-371
[28]   Dark Side or Bright Light: Destructive and Constructive Deviant Content in Consumer Ideation Contests [J].
Gatzweiler, Alexandra ;
Blazevic, Vera ;
Piller, Frank Thomas .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2017, 34 (06) :772-789
[29]  
Glaser B., 1967, DISCOV GROUNDED THEO
[30]   Pragmatism vs interpretivism in qualitative information systems research [J].
Goldkuhl, Goran .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2012, 21 (02) :135-146