Technology transfer efficiency of universities in China: A three-stage framework based on the dynamic network slacks-based measurement model

被引:13
作者
Ma, Ding [1 ]
Cai, Zhishan [1 ]
Zhu, Chengkai [1 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ Technol, Sch Econ, Wuhan 430070, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
University technology transfer; Three-stage framework; Dynamic network SBM; Efficiency; TRANSFER OFFICES; RELATIVE PERFORMANCE; HIGHER-EDUCATION; INNOVATION; INDUSTRY; GROWTH; IMPACT; DEA; UK; US;
D O I
10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102031
中图分类号
D58 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
摘要
Despite being considered as the key provider of industry technology, universities still have a prominent issue of low efficiency in technology transfer. Understanding university technology transfer (UTT) efficiency from a decomposed perspective is essential because it traces the specific difficulties and UTT's improvement path. This study quantifies UTT efficiency from a sequential process encompassing research innovation, experimental development, and value creation stages in 31 Chinese universities. Based on the Dynamic Network Slacks-based Measurement (DNSBM) model, the stage efficiencies, inter-stage linkage efficiencies, and inter-period carry-over efficiencies can be evaluated. A Malmquist decomposition is further carried out to infer the paths and restrictions of efficiency enhancement. The results reveal that: 1) performance varies greatly across the three stages of UTT in China and the detachment of R&D and value creation efficiencies is prominent; 2) inter-stage linking efficiency losses manifest themselves in R&D output redundancy and trial contract inadequacy, while carry-over efficiency losses are primarily reflected in insufficient dynamic accumulation of funds; and 3) technical efficiency improvement plays a dominant role in total factor productivity (TFP) growth, particularly in the value creation stage. Breaking the barriers of TFP growth in the research innovation and experimental development stages hinges on technology progress, implying more resources should be allocated to improving R&D quality and trial success.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Measuring the efficiency of university technology transfer
    Anderson, Timothy R.
    Daim, Tugrul U.
    Lavoie, Francois F.
    [J]. TECHNOVATION, 2007, 27 (05) : 306 - 318
  • [2] The Role of Supporting Factors on Patenting Activities in Emerging Entrepreneurial Universities
    Ar, Ilker Murat
    Temel, Serdal
    Dabic, Marina
    Howells, Jeremy
    Mert, Ali
    Yesilay, Rustem Baris
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2023, 70 (06) : 2293 - 2304
  • [3] Arora A., 2001, IND CORP CHANGE, V10, P419, DOI DOI 10.1093/ICC/10.2.419
  • [4] Performance evaluation of China's innovation during the industry-university-research collaboration process-an analysis basis on the dynamic network slacks-based measurement model
    Bai, Xue-Jie
    Li, Zhen-Yang
    Zeng, Jin
    [J]. TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY, 2020, 62
  • [5] Bian Wenlong, 2016, STAT RES, V33, P13, DOI [10.19343/j.cnki.11-1302/c.2016.06.002, DOI 10.19343/J.CNKI.11-1302/C.2016.06.002]
  • [6] THE ECONOMIC-THEORY OF INDEX NUMBERS AND THE MEASUREMENT OF INPUT, OUTPUT, AND PRODUCTIVITY
    CAVES, DW
    CHRISTENSEN, LR
    DIEWERT, WE
    [J]. ECONOMETRICA, 1982, 50 (06) : 1393 - 1414
  • [7] The activities of university knowledge transfer offices: towards the third mission in Italy
    Cesaroni, Fabrizio
    Piccaluga, Andrea
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, 2016, 41 (04) : 753 - 777
  • [8] Assessing the relative performance of UK university technology transfer offices: parametric and non-parametric evidence
    Chapple, W
    Lockett, A
    Siegel, D
    Wright, M
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2005, 34 (03) : 369 - 384
  • [9] MEASURING EFFICIENCY OF DECISION-MAKING UNITS
    CHARNES, A
    COOPER, WW
    RHODES, E
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1978, 2 (06) : 429 - 444
  • [10] University technology transfer: how (in)efficient are French universities?
    Curi, Claudia
    Daraio, Cinzia
    Llerena, Patrick
    [J]. CAMBRIDGE JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2012, 36 (03) : 629 - 654