Variation in Academic Medical Centers' Coding Practices for Postoperative Respiratory Complications Implications for the AHRQ Postoperative Respiratory Failure Patient Safety Indicator

被引:13
作者
Utter, Garth H. [1 ,2 ]
Cuny, Joanne [3 ]
Strater, Amy [3 ]
Silver, Michael R. [4 ]
Hossli, Susan [3 ]
Romano, Patrick S. [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Sacramento, CA 95817 USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Med Ctr, Ctr Healthcare Policy & Res, Sacramento, CA 95817 USA
[3] Univ Hlthsyst Consortium, Oak Brook, England
[4] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[5] Univ Calif Davis, Med Ctr, Dept Internal Med, Sacramento, CA 95817 USA
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
medical coding; postoperative respiratory failure; pulmonary complication; patient safety; quality of care; patient safety indicator; quality indicators; health care; respiratory insufficiency/complications; EPIDURAL-ANESTHESIA; ACCURACY; MULTICENTER; ANALGESIA; RISK;
D O I
10.1097/MLR.0b013e31825a8b69
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Patient Safety Indicator (PSI) 11 uses International Classification of Disease, 9th Clinical Modification diagnosis code 518.81 ("Acute respiratory failure")-but not the closely related alternative, 518.5 ("Pulmonary insufficiency after trauma and surgery")-to detect cases of postoperative respiratory failure. We sought to determine whether hospitals vary in the use of 518.81 versus 518.5 and whether such variation correlates with coder beliefs. Study Design: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of administrative data from July 2009 through June 2010 for UHC (formerly University Health System Consortium)-affiliated centers to assess the use of diagnosis codes 518.81 and 518.5 in PSI 11-eligible cases. We also surveyed coders at these centers to evaluate whether variation in the use of 518.81 versus 518.5 might be linked to coder beliefs. We asked survey respondents which diagnosis they would use for 2 ambiguous cases of postoperative pulmonary complications and how much they agreed with 6 statements about the coding process. Results: UHC-affiliated centers demonstrated wide variation in the use of 518.81 and 518.5, ranging from 0 to 26 cases and 0 to 56 cases/1000 PSI 11-eligible hospitalizations, respectively. Of 56 survey respondents, 64% chose 518.81 and 30% chose 518.5 for a clinical scenario involving postoperative respiratory failure, but these responses were not associated with actual coding of 518.81 or 518.5 at the center level. Sixty-two percent of respondents agreed that they are constrained by the words that physicians use. Their self-reported likelihood of querying physicians to clarify the diagnosis was significantly associated with coding of 518.5 at the center level. Conclusions: The extent to which diagnosis code 518.81 is used relative to 518.5 varies considerably across centers, based on local coding practice, the specific wording of physician documentation, and coder-physician communication. To standardize the coding of postoperative respiratory failure, the 518.81 and 518.5 codes have recently been revised to make the available options clearer and mutually exclusive, which may improve the capacity of PSI 11 to discriminate true differences in quality of care.
引用
收藏
页码:792 / 800
页数:9
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   A multicenter study of the coding accuracy of hospital discharge administrative data for patients admitted to cardiac care units in Ontario [J].
Austin, PC ;
Daly, PA ;
Tu, JV .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2002, 144 (02) :290-296
[2]   How Valid is the AHRQ Patient Safety Indicator "Postoperative Respiratory Failure"? [J].
Borzecki, Ann M. ;
Kaafarani, Haytham M. A. ;
Utter, Garth H. ;
Romano, Patrick S. ;
Shin, Marlena H. ;
Chen, Qi ;
Itani, Kamal M. F. ;
Rosen, Amy K. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2011, 212 (06) :935-945
[3]   Postoperative enteral versus parenteral nutrition in malnourished patients with gastrointestinal cancer: a randomised multicentre trial [J].
Bozzetti, F ;
Braga, M ;
Gianotti, L ;
Gavazzi, C ;
Mariani, L .
LANCET, 2001, 358 (9292) :1487-1492
[4]   A systematic review of discharge coding accuracy [J].
Campbell, SE ;
Campbell, MK ;
Grimshaw, JM ;
Walker, AE .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MEDICINE, 2001, 23 (03) :205-211
[5]   Prospective Study of Coding Practices for Cesarean Deliveries [J].
Chescheir, Nancy ;
Meints, Laura .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 114 (02) :217-223
[6]  
Cox JL, 1997, CAN J CARDIOL, V13, P351
[7]   Hospital costs associated with surgical complications: A report from the private-sector national surgical quality improvement program [J].
Dimick, JB ;
Chen, SL ;
Taheri, PA ;
Henderson, WG ;
Khuri, SF ;
Campbell, DA .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2004, 199 (04) :531-537
[8]  
Hohnloser JH, 1996, METHOD INFORM MED, V35, P108
[9]  
LeMier M, 2001, Inj Prev, V7, P334, DOI 10.1136/ip.7.4.334
[10]   PHYSICIAN AND CODING ERRORS IN PATIENT RECORDS [J].
LLOYD, SS ;
RISSING, JP .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1985, 254 (10) :1330-1336