External cephalic version of non-cephalic presentation; is it worthwhile?

被引:7
作者
Gottvall, Tomas [1 ,2 ]
Ginstman, Charlotte [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Linkoping Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Clin & Expt Med, Div Obstet & Gynecol, Linkoping, Sweden
[2] Cty Council Ostergotland, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Linkoping, Sweden
关键词
Pregnancy; non-cephalic presentation; external cephalic version; third trimester; cesarean section; BREECH PRESENTATION; TERM; AUDIT;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01221.x
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
A retrospective study of 186 consecutive external cephalic versions (ECV) late in the third trimester was done. Logistic regression analysis of background factors leading to a successful ECV showed that multiparity, a larger amount of amniotic fluid, measured as amniotic fluid index, and a transverse fetal position were each significantly correlated with a successful version. The total success rate was 62%, and after a successful ECV 84% of the fetuses were delivered vaginally. No severe complications were registered during the ECVs, and all babies had normal Apgar scores at delivery. Attempting ECV at least once or even twice seems to be appropriate because a successful ECV can decrease the rate of cesarean section in this group of patients and by so doing may also decrease the risk of cesarean section in future pregnancies.
引用
收藏
页码:1443 / 1445
页数:3
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] Prognostic parameters for successful external cephalic version
    Ben-Meir, Assaf
    Erez, Yair
    Sela, Hen Yitzhak
    Shveiky, David
    Tsafrir, Avi
    Ezra, Yossef
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2008, 21 (09) : 660 - 662
  • [2] Intrapartum cesarean delivery after successful external cephalic version: A meta-analysis
    Chan, LY
    Tang, JL
    Tsoi, KF
    Fok, WY
    Chan, LW
    Lau, TK
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 104 (01) : 155 - 160
  • [3] Impact of parity on obstetric and neonatal outcome of external cephalic version
    El-Toukhy, T.
    Ramadan, G.
    Maidman, D.
    Hanna, L.
    Waterstone, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2007, 27 (06) : 580 - 584
  • [4] Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial
    Hannah, ME
    Hannah, WJ
    Hewson, SA
    Hodnett, ED
    Saigal, S
    Willan, AR
    [J]. LANCET, 2000, 356 (9239) : 1375 - 1383
  • [5] Introducing external cephalic version at 36 weeks or more in a district general hospital: a review and an audit
    Healey, M
    Porter, R
    Galimberti, A
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1997, 104 (09): : 1073 - 1079
  • [6] Pregnancy outcome after successful external cephalic version for breech presentation at term
    Lau, TK
    Lo, KWK
    Rogers, M
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 176 (01) : 218 - 223
  • [7] Outcome of labour after successful external cephalic version at term complicated by isolated transient fetal bradycardia
    Lau, TK
    Lo, KWK
    Leung, TY
    Fok, WY
    Rogers, MS
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2000, 107 (03): : 401 - 405
  • [8] Outcomes of external cephalic version and breech presentation at term, an audit of deliveries at a Sydney tertiary obstetric hospital, 1997-2004
    Nassar, Natasha
    Roberts, Christine L.
    Cameron, Carolyn A.
    Peat, Brian
    [J]. ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2006, 85 (10) : 1231 - 1238
  • [9] Royal College of Obstetricians and gynaecologists, 2001, NAT CENT CAES SECT A
  • [10] Tasnim N, 2009, JCPSP-J COLL PHYSICI, V19, P91, DOI 02.2009/JCPSP.9194